随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多剂量研究评估Elezanumab加入复发和进展型多发性硬化症标准治疗时的安全性和有效性。

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Bruce A C Cree, Mark S Freedman, Michael Gold, Kimberly Pfleeger, Brittany Schwefel, Annette Wundes, Adam Ziemann
{"title":"随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多剂量研究评估Elezanumab加入复发和进展型多发性硬化症标准治疗时的安全性和有效性。","authors":"Bruce A C Cree, Mark S Freedman, Michael Gold, Kimberly Pfleeger, Brittany Schwefel, Annette Wundes, Adam Ziemann","doi":"10.1002/ana.27262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Elezanumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds repulsive guidance molecule a (RGMa), an inhibitor of central nervous system regeneration after inflammation or injury. The aim was to assess the safety and efficacy of elezanumab in relapsing and progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RADIUS-R and RADIUS-P were phase 2 trials in relapsing (RADIUS-R) or progressive (RADIUS-P) MS. Participants were randomized to intravenous elezanumab 400mg, 1800mg, or placebo every 4 weeks through week 48. The primary endpoint was the mean Overall Response Score (ORS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In RADIUS-R, 208 participants received elezanumab 400mg (n = 69), elezanumab 1800mg (n = 69), or placebo (n = 70). In RADIUS-P, 123 participants received elezanumab 400mg (n = 40), elezanumab 1800mg (n = 40), or placebo (n = 43). The primary endpoint of ORS was not met in either study. For RADIUS-R, mean ORS was -0.2 with effect size of -0.2 for elezanumab 400mg and -0.2 with effect size of -0.2 for elezanumab 1800mg. For RADIUS-P, mean ORS was 0.0 with effect size of 0.0 for elezanumab 400mg and 0.1 with effect size of 0.1 for elezanumab 1800mg. Elezanumab was well tolerated; the rate of serious adverse events was similar across treatment groups in both studies. Adverse events with ≥10% of elezanumab population were falls, urinary tract infections, headaches in RADIUS-R and RADIUS-P, and also fatigue, infusion-related reactions, and muscular weakness in RADIUS-P.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Elezanumab was safe and well tolerated, but did not meet the primary endpoint in either study. ANN NEUROL 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":127,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multiple-Dose Studies to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Elezanumab when Added to Standard of Care in Relapsing and Progressive Forms of Multiple Sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Bruce A C Cree, Mark S Freedman, Michael Gold, Kimberly Pfleeger, Brittany Schwefel, Annette Wundes, Adam Ziemann\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ana.27262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Elezanumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds repulsive guidance molecule a (RGMa), an inhibitor of central nervous system regeneration after inflammation or injury. The aim was to assess the safety and efficacy of elezanumab in relapsing and progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RADIUS-R and RADIUS-P were phase 2 trials in relapsing (RADIUS-R) or progressive (RADIUS-P) MS. Participants were randomized to intravenous elezanumab 400mg, 1800mg, or placebo every 4 weeks through week 48. The primary endpoint was the mean Overall Response Score (ORS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In RADIUS-R, 208 participants received elezanumab 400mg (n = 69), elezanumab 1800mg (n = 69), or placebo (n = 70). In RADIUS-P, 123 participants received elezanumab 400mg (n = 40), elezanumab 1800mg (n = 40), or placebo (n = 43). The primary endpoint of ORS was not met in either study. For RADIUS-R, mean ORS was -0.2 with effect size of -0.2 for elezanumab 400mg and -0.2 with effect size of -0.2 for elezanumab 1800mg. For RADIUS-P, mean ORS was 0.0 with effect size of 0.0 for elezanumab 400mg and 0.1 with effect size of 0.1 for elezanumab 1800mg. Elezanumab was well tolerated; the rate of serious adverse events was similar across treatment groups in both studies. Adverse events with ≥10% of elezanumab population were falls, urinary tract infections, headaches in RADIUS-R and RADIUS-P, and also fatigue, infusion-related reactions, and muscular weakness in RADIUS-P.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Elezanumab was safe and well tolerated, but did not meet the primary endpoint in either study. ANN NEUROL 2025.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.27262\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.27262","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:Elezanumab是一种结合排斥性引导分子a (RGMa)的单克隆抗体,RGMa是炎症或损伤后中枢神经系统再生的抑制剂。目的是评估elezanumab在复发性和进行性多发性硬化症(MS)中的安全性和有效性。方法:RADIUS-R和RADIUS-P是复发性(RADIUS-R)或进展性(RADIUS-P) ms的2期试验,参与者每4周随机接受静脉注射elezanumab 400mg, 1800mg或安慰剂,直到第48周。主要终点是平均总反应评分(ORS)。结果:在RADIUS-R中,208名参与者接受了elezanumab 400mg (n = 69), elezanumab 1800mg (n = 69)或安慰剂(n = 70)。在RADIUS-P中,123名参与者接受了elezanumab 400mg (n = 40), elezanumab 1800mg (n = 40)或安慰剂(n = 43)。两项研究均未达到ORS的主要终点。对于RADIUS-R, elezanumab 400mg的平均ORS为-0.2,效应值为-0.2;elezanumab 1800mg的平均ORS为-0.2,效应值为-0.2。对于RADIUS-P, elezanumab 400mg的平均ORS为0.0,效应量为0.0;elezanumab 1800mg的平均ORS为0.1,效应量为0.1。Elezanumab耐受性良好;在两项研究中,严重不良事件的发生率在治疗组之间相似。≥10%的elezanumab患者的不良事件包括跌倒、尿路感染、RADIUS-R组和RADIUS-P组的头痛,以及RADIUS-P组的疲劳、输注相关反应和肌肉无力。解释:Elezanumab是安全且耐受性良好的,但在两项研究中均未达到主要终点。Ann neurol 2025。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multiple-Dose Studies to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Elezanumab when Added to Standard of Care in Relapsing and Progressive Forms of Multiple Sclerosis.

Objective: Elezanumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds repulsive guidance molecule a (RGMa), an inhibitor of central nervous system regeneration after inflammation or injury. The aim was to assess the safety and efficacy of elezanumab in relapsing and progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS).

Methods: RADIUS-R and RADIUS-P were phase 2 trials in relapsing (RADIUS-R) or progressive (RADIUS-P) MS. Participants were randomized to intravenous elezanumab 400mg, 1800mg, or placebo every 4 weeks through week 48. The primary endpoint was the mean Overall Response Score (ORS).

Results: In RADIUS-R, 208 participants received elezanumab 400mg (n = 69), elezanumab 1800mg (n = 69), or placebo (n = 70). In RADIUS-P, 123 participants received elezanumab 400mg (n = 40), elezanumab 1800mg (n = 40), or placebo (n = 43). The primary endpoint of ORS was not met in either study. For RADIUS-R, mean ORS was -0.2 with effect size of -0.2 for elezanumab 400mg and -0.2 with effect size of -0.2 for elezanumab 1800mg. For RADIUS-P, mean ORS was 0.0 with effect size of 0.0 for elezanumab 400mg and 0.1 with effect size of 0.1 for elezanumab 1800mg. Elezanumab was well tolerated; the rate of serious adverse events was similar across treatment groups in both studies. Adverse events with ≥10% of elezanumab population were falls, urinary tract infections, headaches in RADIUS-R and RADIUS-P, and also fatigue, infusion-related reactions, and muscular weakness in RADIUS-P.

Interpretation: Elezanumab was safe and well tolerated, but did not meet the primary endpoint in either study. ANN NEUROL 2025.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Neurology
Annals of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
18.00
自引率
1.80%
发文量
270
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Neurology publishes original articles with potential for high impact in understanding the pathogenesis, clinical and laboratory features, diagnosis, treatment, outcomes and science underlying diseases of the human nervous system. Articles should ideally be of broad interest to the academic neurological community rather than solely to subspecialists in a particular field. Studies involving experimental model system, including those in cell and organ cultures and animals, of direct translational relevance to the understanding of neurological disease are also encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信