Mahmut Uçar, Mukaddes Yılmaz, Eda Erdiş, Birsen Yücel
{"title":"泛免疫炎症价值评分在局部晚期直肠癌中的重要性","authors":"Mahmut Uçar, Mukaddes Yılmaz, Eda Erdiş, Birsen Yücel","doi":"10.1002/iid3.70227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>In this study, we aimed to observe the prognostic significance of the pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) score calculated at the time of diagnosis in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, as well as its effect on treatment response, survival, and prognosis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and Method</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective, single-center observational study was designed to analyze patients with nonmetastatic (stages II–III) rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant treatment, categorized into two groups: PIV-L (<i>n</i> = 67, 50%) and PIV-H (<i>n</i> = 67, 50%). The median PIV score was used for cutoff determination. Survival analysis was applied. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to determine prognostic factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Preoperative clinical lymph node status (<i>p</i> = 0.011), liver metastasis (<i>p</i> = 0.028), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA; <i>p</i> = 0.013), and cancer antigen 19.9 (CA19.9; <i>p</i> = 0.040) levels; pathological complete response (<i>p</i> = 0.035); tumor regression score (<i>p</i> = 0.030); postoperative lymph node status (<i>p</i> = 0.019); tumor deposits (<i>p</i> = 0.035); and budding (<i>p</i> = 0.043) were statistically different between the groups. The 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates were 77% versus 69% and 62% versus 38% in the PIV-L and PIV-H groups, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.032). While the PIV score was prognostic for OS in univariate analysis (HR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.04–3.31, <i>p</i> = 0.035), a result of insignificance was obtained in multivariate analysis (HR: 1.76, 95% CI: 0.98–3.01 <i>p</i> = 0.056). The 5- and 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 67% versus 54% and 56% versus 39% in the PIV-L and PIV-H groups, respectively, with the PIV-H group showing a statistically significantly lower rate (<i>p</i> = 0.048). For DFS, the PIV score was found to be a statistically insignificant prognostic factor in univariate analysis (HR: 0.052, 95% CI: 0.99–2.86, <i>p</i> = 0.052) and recognized as an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (HR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.08–3.26, <i>p</i> = 0.026).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>A higher pretreatment PIV score was associated with poorer clinicopathological features, a worse treatment response, lower survival rates, and a poor prognosis for DFS.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13289,"journal":{"name":"Immunity, Inflammation and Disease","volume":"13 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/iid3.70227","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Importance of Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value Score in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Mahmut Uçar, Mukaddes Yılmaz, Eda Erdiş, Birsen Yücel\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/iid3.70227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this study, we aimed to observe the prognostic significance of the pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) score calculated at the time of diagnosis in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, as well as its effect on treatment response, survival, and prognosis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Material and Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>This retrospective, single-center observational study was designed to analyze patients with nonmetastatic (stages II–III) rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant treatment, categorized into two groups: PIV-L (<i>n</i> = 67, 50%) and PIV-H (<i>n</i> = 67, 50%). The median PIV score was used for cutoff determination. Survival analysis was applied. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to determine prognostic factors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Preoperative clinical lymph node status (<i>p</i> = 0.011), liver metastasis (<i>p</i> = 0.028), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA; <i>p</i> = 0.013), and cancer antigen 19.9 (CA19.9; <i>p</i> = 0.040) levels; pathological complete response (<i>p</i> = 0.035); tumor regression score (<i>p</i> = 0.030); postoperative lymph node status (<i>p</i> = 0.019); tumor deposits (<i>p</i> = 0.035); and budding (<i>p</i> = 0.043) were statistically different between the groups. The 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates were 77% versus 69% and 62% versus 38% in the PIV-L and PIV-H groups, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.032). While the PIV score was prognostic for OS in univariate analysis (HR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.04–3.31, <i>p</i> = 0.035), a result of insignificance was obtained in multivariate analysis (HR: 1.76, 95% CI: 0.98–3.01 <i>p</i> = 0.056). The 5- and 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 67% versus 54% and 56% versus 39% in the PIV-L and PIV-H groups, respectively, with the PIV-H group showing a statistically significantly lower rate (<i>p</i> = 0.048). For DFS, the PIV score was found to be a statistically insignificant prognostic factor in univariate analysis (HR: 0.052, 95% CI: 0.99–2.86, <i>p</i> = 0.052) and recognized as an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (HR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.08–3.26, <i>p</i> = 0.026).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>A higher pretreatment PIV score was associated with poorer clinicopathological features, a worse treatment response, lower survival rates, and a poor prognosis for DFS.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Immunity, Inflammation and Disease\",\"volume\":\"13 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/iid3.70227\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Immunity, Inflammation and Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iid3.70227\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunity, Inflammation and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iid3.70227","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Importance of Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value Score in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Aim
In this study, we aimed to observe the prognostic significance of the pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) score calculated at the time of diagnosis in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, as well as its effect on treatment response, survival, and prognosis.
Material and Method
This retrospective, single-center observational study was designed to analyze patients with nonmetastatic (stages II–III) rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant treatment, categorized into two groups: PIV-L (n = 67, 50%) and PIV-H (n = 67, 50%). The median PIV score was used for cutoff determination. Survival analysis was applied. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to determine prognostic factors.
Results
Preoperative clinical lymph node status (p = 0.011), liver metastasis (p = 0.028), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA; p = 0.013), and cancer antigen 19.9 (CA19.9; p = 0.040) levels; pathological complete response (p = 0.035); tumor regression score (p = 0.030); postoperative lymph node status (p = 0.019); tumor deposits (p = 0.035); and budding (p = 0.043) were statistically different between the groups. The 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates were 77% versus 69% and 62% versus 38% in the PIV-L and PIV-H groups, respectively (p = 0.032). While the PIV score was prognostic for OS in univariate analysis (HR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.04–3.31, p = 0.035), a result of insignificance was obtained in multivariate analysis (HR: 1.76, 95% CI: 0.98–3.01 p = 0.056). The 5- and 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 67% versus 54% and 56% versus 39% in the PIV-L and PIV-H groups, respectively, with the PIV-H group showing a statistically significantly lower rate (p = 0.048). For DFS, the PIV score was found to be a statistically insignificant prognostic factor in univariate analysis (HR: 0.052, 95% CI: 0.99–2.86, p = 0.052) and recognized as an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (HR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.08–3.26, p = 0.026).
Conclusion
A higher pretreatment PIV score was associated with poorer clinicopathological features, a worse treatment response, lower survival rates, and a poor prognosis for DFS.
期刊介绍:
Immunity, Inflammation and Disease is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research across the broad field of immunology. Immunity, Inflammation and Disease gives rapid consideration to papers in all areas of clinical and basic research. The journal is indexed in Medline and the Science Citation Index Expanded (part of Web of Science), among others. It welcomes original work that enhances the understanding of immunology in areas including:
• cellular and molecular immunology
• clinical immunology
• allergy
• immunochemistry
• immunogenetics
• immune signalling
• immune development
• imaging
• mathematical modelling
• autoimmunity
• transplantation immunology
• cancer immunology