生物治疗缓解哮喘和慢性鼻窦炎合并鼻息肉患者的耳科症状和体征

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Anna Suikkila, Annina Lyly, Riitta Saarinen, Marie Lundberg, Lena Hafrén
{"title":"生物治疗缓解哮喘和慢性鼻窦炎合并鼻息肉患者的耳科症状和体征","authors":"Anna Suikkila,&nbsp;Annina Lyly,&nbsp;Riitta Saarinen,&nbsp;Marie Lundberg,&nbsp;Lena Hafrén","doi":"10.1002/lio2.70212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Multiple biologics are available for severe asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Otologic symptoms are common among these patients, and otitis media (OM) is considered part of the associated eosinophilic multimorbidity. However, few studies describe the effect of biologics on OM. This study aimed to explore whether type 2 anti-inflammatory biologics can also alleviate otologic symptoms and signs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrieved patients who were prescribed biologics for CRSwNP from the electronic patient records (EPRs) of a tertiary referral ear, nose, and throat center. We also included patients from two previous studies on otologic manifestations of NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD), who were prescribed biologic medication at a skin and allergy center. Patients who were followed up for less than 12 months were excluded. Demographic information and the response to the biologic therapy were collected from EPRs. Regular appointments were at 0, 4–8, and 12 months, and included a physical examination by ear, nose, and throat (ENT) specialist and two validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) and the otology-specific Ear Outcome Survey-16 (EOS-16).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All of the 40 patients included had CRSwNP, and 90% had asthma. A total of 17 (42.5%) had clinical otologic signs before starting biologic medication. The main indications for biologic therapy were CRSwNP (70%) and asthma (22.5%). Three patients (7.5%) had both CRSwNP and asthma, but their severe OM symptoms were the main indication for biologic therapy. The SNOT-22 scores were significantly lower at 12 months in all the ear/facial domain questions: ear fullness (<i>Z</i> = −3.434, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), dizziness (<i>Z</i> = −3.452, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), ear pain (<i>Z</i> = −3.097, <i>p</i> = 0.002), and facial pain/pressure (<i>Z</i> = −3.133, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Similarly, the EOS-16 yielded significantly lower scores (Z = −2.791, <i>p</i> = 0.005). Additionally, the clinical otologic signs improved (<i>Z</i> = −2.994, <i>p</i> = 0.003).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The biologics prescribed for asthma and CRSwNP significantly reduced otologic symptoms and signs. Prospective studies are warranted to explore associated OM as a new target for biologic therapy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.70212","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biologic Therapy Relieves Otologic Symptoms and Signs in Patients With Asthma and Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps\",\"authors\":\"Anna Suikkila,&nbsp;Annina Lyly,&nbsp;Riitta Saarinen,&nbsp;Marie Lundberg,&nbsp;Lena Hafrén\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lio2.70212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Multiple biologics are available for severe asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Otologic symptoms are common among these patients, and otitis media (OM) is considered part of the associated eosinophilic multimorbidity. However, few studies describe the effect of biologics on OM. This study aimed to explore whether type 2 anti-inflammatory biologics can also alleviate otologic symptoms and signs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We retrieved patients who were prescribed biologics for CRSwNP from the electronic patient records (EPRs) of a tertiary referral ear, nose, and throat center. We also included patients from two previous studies on otologic manifestations of NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD), who were prescribed biologic medication at a skin and allergy center. Patients who were followed up for less than 12 months were excluded. Demographic information and the response to the biologic therapy were collected from EPRs. Regular appointments were at 0, 4–8, and 12 months, and included a physical examination by ear, nose, and throat (ENT) specialist and two validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) and the otology-specific Ear Outcome Survey-16 (EOS-16).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>All of the 40 patients included had CRSwNP, and 90% had asthma. A total of 17 (42.5%) had clinical otologic signs before starting biologic medication. The main indications for biologic therapy were CRSwNP (70%) and asthma (22.5%). Three patients (7.5%) had both CRSwNP and asthma, but their severe OM symptoms were the main indication for biologic therapy. The SNOT-22 scores were significantly lower at 12 months in all the ear/facial domain questions: ear fullness (<i>Z</i> = −3.434, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), dizziness (<i>Z</i> = −3.452, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), ear pain (<i>Z</i> = −3.097, <i>p</i> = 0.002), and facial pain/pressure (<i>Z</i> = −3.133, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Similarly, the EOS-16 yielded significantly lower scores (Z = −2.791, <i>p</i> = 0.005). Additionally, the clinical otologic signs improved (<i>Z</i> = −2.994, <i>p</i> = 0.003).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The biologics prescribed for asthma and CRSwNP significantly reduced otologic symptoms and signs. Prospective studies are warranted to explore associated OM as a new target for biologic therapy.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.70212\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70212\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70212","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多种生物制剂可用于治疗严重哮喘和慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)。耳科症状在这些患者中很常见,中耳炎(OM)被认为是相关嗜酸性粒细胞多病的一部分。然而,很少有研究描述生物制剂对OM的影响。本研究旨在探讨2型抗炎生物制剂是否也能减轻耳科症状和体征。方法我们从三级转诊耳鼻喉中心的电子病历(epr)中检索处方CRSwNP生物制剂的患者。我们还纳入了先前两项研究中nsaid加重呼吸道疾病(NERD)的耳科表现的患者,这些患者在皮肤和过敏中心接受了生物药物治疗。随访时间少于12个月的患者被排除在外。从epr中收集人口统计信息和对生物治疗的反应。在0、4-8和12个月定期预约,包括耳鼻喉科(ENT)专家的体格检查和两项经过验证的患者报告结果测量(PROMs):中鼻结果测试-22 (SNOT-22)和耳科特异性耳部结果调查-16 (EOS-16)。结果40例患者均有CRSwNP, 90%有哮喘。共有17例(42.5%)患者在开始生物药物治疗前有临床耳科症状。生物治疗的主要适应症为CRSwNP(70%)和哮喘(22.5%)。3例(7.5%)患者同时存在CRSwNP和哮喘,但其严重的OM症状是生物治疗的主要适应症。12个月时,SNOT-22评分在耳朵/面部领域的所有问题上均显著降低:耳朵丰满度(Z = - 3.434, p < 0.001)、头晕(Z = - 3.452, p < 0.001)、耳痛(Z = - 3.097, p = 0.002)和面部疼痛/压力(Z = - 3.133, p = 0.002)。同样,EOS-16的评分明显较低(Z = - 2.791, p = 0.005)。临床耳科症状改善(Z =−2.994,p = 0.003)。结论哮喘及CRSwNP生物制剂可显著减轻耳科症状和体征。有必要进行前瞻性研究,以探索相关的OM作为生物治疗的新靶点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Biologic Therapy Relieves Otologic Symptoms and Signs in Patients With Asthma and Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps

Biologic Therapy Relieves Otologic Symptoms and Signs in Patients With Asthma and Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps

Objectives

Multiple biologics are available for severe asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Otologic symptoms are common among these patients, and otitis media (OM) is considered part of the associated eosinophilic multimorbidity. However, few studies describe the effect of biologics on OM. This study aimed to explore whether type 2 anti-inflammatory biologics can also alleviate otologic symptoms and signs.

Methods

We retrieved patients who were prescribed biologics for CRSwNP from the electronic patient records (EPRs) of a tertiary referral ear, nose, and throat center. We also included patients from two previous studies on otologic manifestations of NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD), who were prescribed biologic medication at a skin and allergy center. Patients who were followed up for less than 12 months were excluded. Demographic information and the response to the biologic therapy were collected from EPRs. Regular appointments were at 0, 4–8, and 12 months, and included a physical examination by ear, nose, and throat (ENT) specialist and two validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) and the otology-specific Ear Outcome Survey-16 (EOS-16).

Results

All of the 40 patients included had CRSwNP, and 90% had asthma. A total of 17 (42.5%) had clinical otologic signs before starting biologic medication. The main indications for biologic therapy were CRSwNP (70%) and asthma (22.5%). Three patients (7.5%) had both CRSwNP and asthma, but their severe OM symptoms were the main indication for biologic therapy. The SNOT-22 scores were significantly lower at 12 months in all the ear/facial domain questions: ear fullness (Z = −3.434, p < 0.001), dizziness (Z = −3.452, p < 0.001), ear pain (Z = −3.097, p = 0.002), and facial pain/pressure (Z = −3.133, p = 0.002). Similarly, the EOS-16 yielded significantly lower scores (Z = −2.791, p = 0.005). Additionally, the clinical otologic signs improved (Z = −2.994, p = 0.003).

Conclusion

The biologics prescribed for asthma and CRSwNP significantly reduced otologic symptoms and signs. Prospective studies are warranted to explore associated OM as a new target for biologic therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信