Mary Witt, Anna J. Esbensen, Ayesha Harisinghani, Nicolas M. Oreskovic, Michelle Palumbo, Stephanie L. Santoro
{"title":"焦虑、抑郁和情绪量表(ADAMS)在唐氏综合征专科门诊抑郁和心理健康诊断中的应用","authors":"Mary Witt, Anna J. Esbensen, Ayesha Harisinghani, Nicolas M. Oreskovic, Michelle Palumbo, Stephanie L. Santoro","doi":"10.1111/jar.70097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The Anxiety, Depression and Mood Scale (ADAMS), a mental health screening tool developed for individuals with intellectual disabilities, has yet to be evaluated in adults with Down syndrome. We included the ADAMS in a Dementia Protocol.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>We reviewed the charts of 71 adults with Down syndrome seen in a specialty clinic and collected ADAMS data from our quality improvement project. We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the ADAMS at five cutoff points to identify optimal screening thresholds for adults with Down syndrome.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Cutoff points set at two points below the 75th percentile scores of the original ADAMS publication presented optimal sensitivity of 81.82%, specificity of 82.93%, PPV of 72.00% and NPV of 89.47%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>For adults with Down syndrome, we suggest alternate thresholds, generally two points below the original ADAMS thresholds, to adequately capture mental health concerns.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"38 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use of the Anxiety, Depression and Mood Scale (ADAMS) as a Screening Instrument for Depression and Mental Health Diagnoses in a Down Syndrome Specialty Clinic\",\"authors\":\"Mary Witt, Anna J. Esbensen, Ayesha Harisinghani, Nicolas M. Oreskovic, Michelle Palumbo, Stephanie L. Santoro\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jar.70097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Anxiety, Depression and Mood Scale (ADAMS), a mental health screening tool developed for individuals with intellectual disabilities, has yet to be evaluated in adults with Down syndrome. We included the ADAMS in a Dementia Protocol.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>We reviewed the charts of 71 adults with Down syndrome seen in a specialty clinic and collected ADAMS data from our quality improvement project. We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the ADAMS at five cutoff points to identify optimal screening thresholds for adults with Down syndrome.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Cutoff points set at two points below the 75th percentile scores of the original ADAMS publication presented optimal sensitivity of 81.82%, specificity of 82.93%, PPV of 72.00% and NPV of 89.47%.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>For adults with Down syndrome, we suggest alternate thresholds, generally two points below the original ADAMS thresholds, to adequately capture mental health concerns.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.70097\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.70097","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Use of the Anxiety, Depression and Mood Scale (ADAMS) as a Screening Instrument for Depression and Mental Health Diagnoses in a Down Syndrome Specialty Clinic
Introduction
The Anxiety, Depression and Mood Scale (ADAMS), a mental health screening tool developed for individuals with intellectual disabilities, has yet to be evaluated in adults with Down syndrome. We included the ADAMS in a Dementia Protocol.
Method
We reviewed the charts of 71 adults with Down syndrome seen in a specialty clinic and collected ADAMS data from our quality improvement project. We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the ADAMS at five cutoff points to identify optimal screening thresholds for adults with Down syndrome.
Results
Cutoff points set at two points below the 75th percentile scores of the original ADAMS publication presented optimal sensitivity of 81.82%, specificity of 82.93%, PPV of 72.00% and NPV of 89.47%.
Conclusion
For adults with Down syndrome, we suggest alternate thresholds, generally two points below the original ADAMS thresholds, to adequately capture mental health concerns.
期刊介绍:
JARID is an international, peer-reviewed journal which draws together findings derived from original applied research in intellectual disabilities. The journal is an important forum for the dissemination of ideas to promote valued lifestyles for people with intellectual disabilities. It reports on research from the UK and overseas by authors from all relevant professional disciplines. It is aimed at an international, multi-disciplinary readership. Topics covered include community living, quality of life, challenging behaviour, communication, sexuality, medication, ageing, supported employment, family issues, mental health, physical health, autism, economic issues, social networks, staff stress, staff training, epidemiology and service provision.