监管压力降低了农民的幸福感,其程度不亚于经济因素和极端天气的影响

IF 5.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Meredith T. Niles , Pike Stahlmann-Brown
{"title":"监管压力降低了农民的幸福感,其程度不亚于经济因素和极端天气的影响","authors":"Meredith T. Niles ,&nbsp;Pike Stahlmann-Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent evidence suggests that farmers face high levels of stress, depression, and anxiety, which have been associated with lower well-being and life satisfaction outcomes. While factors such as finances, climate, demographics, and social issues have been linked to these outcomes and associated interventions, little research has focused on the relationship between government regulations and their implementation with stress, especially beyond single farm types. To address this gap, we utilize survey data from more than 3400 commercial farmers, foresters, and growers (i.e. “farmers”) across New Zealand to examine how regulatory stress impacts well-being and life satisfaction vis-à-vis financial, climate, demographic, and social factors. We find that the majority of farmers perceive regulations – especially those pertaining to climate change and the environment – as stressful, but that their implementation (as opposed to the regulations themselves) are most correlated with lower well-being and life satisfaction outcomes. Importantly, stress associated with regulations and their implementation has a similar or in some cases larger association with well-being and life satisfaction than failing to make a profit or having been adversely affected by a recent, large, and economically damaging cyclone or extreme flooding. Finally, we observe that while some aspects of regulation and their implementation is consistently and negatively correlated with our three measures of well-being, certain regulations are negatively correlated with current well-being and life satisfaction yet positively correlated with future life satisfaction. That is, stress associated with certain regulations today is correlated with higher anticipated life satisfaction in the future. While we cannot establish causality in these results, we discuss how use of boundary organizations, reducing paperwork burden, and policy review processes could potentially be used to reduce regulatory stress and improve farmer well-being and life satisfaction in the short-term.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103795"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulatory stress lowers farmer well-being as much as financial factors and exposure to extreme weather\",\"authors\":\"Meredith T. Niles ,&nbsp;Pike Stahlmann-Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Recent evidence suggests that farmers face high levels of stress, depression, and anxiety, which have been associated with lower well-being and life satisfaction outcomes. While factors such as finances, climate, demographics, and social issues have been linked to these outcomes and associated interventions, little research has focused on the relationship between government regulations and their implementation with stress, especially beyond single farm types. To address this gap, we utilize survey data from more than 3400 commercial farmers, foresters, and growers (i.e. “farmers”) across New Zealand to examine how regulatory stress impacts well-being and life satisfaction vis-à-vis financial, climate, demographic, and social factors. We find that the majority of farmers perceive regulations – especially those pertaining to climate change and the environment – as stressful, but that their implementation (as opposed to the regulations themselves) are most correlated with lower well-being and life satisfaction outcomes. Importantly, stress associated with regulations and their implementation has a similar or in some cases larger association with well-being and life satisfaction than failing to make a profit or having been adversely affected by a recent, large, and economically damaging cyclone or extreme flooding. Finally, we observe that while some aspects of regulation and their implementation is consistently and negatively correlated with our three measures of well-being, certain regulations are negatively correlated with current well-being and life satisfaction yet positively correlated with future life satisfaction. That is, stress associated with certain regulations today is correlated with higher anticipated life satisfaction in the future. While we cannot establish causality in these results, we discuss how use of boundary organizations, reducing paperwork burden, and policy review processes could potentially be used to reduce regulatory stress and improve farmer well-being and life satisfaction in the short-term.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"volume\":\"119 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103795\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725002360\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725002360","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的证据表明,农民面临着高度的压力、抑郁和焦虑,这些都与较低的幸福感和生活满意度有关。虽然财政、气候、人口和社会问题等因素与这些结果和相关干预措施有关,但很少有研究关注政府法规及其实施与压力之间的关系,特别是在单一农场类型之外。为了解决这一差距,我们利用来自新西兰3400多名商业农民、林农和种植者(即“农民”)的调查数据,通过-à-vis金融、气候、人口和社会因素,研究监管压力如何影响幸福感和生活满意度。我们发现,大多数农民认为法规——尤其是那些与气候变化和环境有关的法规——是有压力的,但它们的实施(与法规本身相反)与较低的幸福感和生活满意度结果最为相关。重要的是,与未能盈利或受到近期大型经济破坏性气旋或极端洪水的不利影响相比,与法规及其实施相关的压力与幸福感和生活满意度有着相似或在某些情况下更大的关联。最后,我们观察到,虽然监管的某些方面及其实施与我们的三个幸福感指标始终呈负相关,但某些监管与当前幸福感和生活满意度呈负相关,但与未来生活满意度呈正相关。也就是说,今天与某些规定相关的压力与未来更高的预期生活满意度相关。虽然我们无法在这些结果中建立因果关系,但我们讨论了如何使用边界组织、减少文书工作负担和政策审查过程,以潜在地减轻监管压力,并在短期内提高农民的福祉和生活满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regulatory stress lowers farmer well-being as much as financial factors and exposure to extreme weather
Recent evidence suggests that farmers face high levels of stress, depression, and anxiety, which have been associated with lower well-being and life satisfaction outcomes. While factors such as finances, climate, demographics, and social issues have been linked to these outcomes and associated interventions, little research has focused on the relationship between government regulations and their implementation with stress, especially beyond single farm types. To address this gap, we utilize survey data from more than 3400 commercial farmers, foresters, and growers (i.e. “farmers”) across New Zealand to examine how regulatory stress impacts well-being and life satisfaction vis-à-vis financial, climate, demographic, and social factors. We find that the majority of farmers perceive regulations – especially those pertaining to climate change and the environment – as stressful, but that their implementation (as opposed to the regulations themselves) are most correlated with lower well-being and life satisfaction outcomes. Importantly, stress associated with regulations and their implementation has a similar or in some cases larger association with well-being and life satisfaction than failing to make a profit or having been adversely affected by a recent, large, and economically damaging cyclone or extreme flooding. Finally, we observe that while some aspects of regulation and their implementation is consistently and negatively correlated with our three measures of well-being, certain regulations are negatively correlated with current well-being and life satisfaction yet positively correlated with future life satisfaction. That is, stress associated with certain regulations today is correlated with higher anticipated life satisfaction in the future. While we cannot establish causality in these results, we discuss how use of boundary organizations, reducing paperwork burden, and policy review processes could potentially be used to reduce regulatory stress and improve farmer well-being and life satisfaction in the short-term.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信