将最后一英里交付转变为物流服务市场:消费者参与动机、资源和背景差异的调查

IF 9.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Xiaodi Liu , Qiwei Pang , Kum Fai Yuen , Xueqin Wang
{"title":"将最后一英里交付转变为物流服务市场:消费者参与动机、资源和背景差异的调查","authors":"Xiaodi Liu ,&nbsp;Qiwei Pang ,&nbsp;Kum Fai Yuen ,&nbsp;Xueqin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Contemporary logistics services have reshaped last-mile delivery into dynamic marketplaces, where consumers engage directly through self-collection or by assisting others in social delivery. This shift signals a move towards consumer-centrism in logistics, which recognises the necessity of consumer participation and value co-creation. Drawing on the service-dominant logic perspective, this study examines consumers’ willingness to participate in logistics value co-creation by focusing on the dual motives of individualising and relating, the mediating role of resource integration tendency, and the moderating effects of two logistics scenarios: self-collection and social delivery. Structural equation modelling (n = 500) reveals that while both motives positively influence consumer participation, resource integration tendency unexpectedly plays a negative mediating role. Additionally, the results demonstrate contextual differences: the individualising motive is more influential in self-collection, whereas the relating motive dominates in social delivery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 115624"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transforming last-mile delivery into marketplaces of logistics services: An investigation on consumer participation motives, resources, and contextual differences\",\"authors\":\"Xiaodi Liu ,&nbsp;Qiwei Pang ,&nbsp;Kum Fai Yuen ,&nbsp;Xueqin Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115624\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Contemporary logistics services have reshaped last-mile delivery into dynamic marketplaces, where consumers engage directly through self-collection or by assisting others in social delivery. This shift signals a move towards consumer-centrism in logistics, which recognises the necessity of consumer participation and value co-creation. Drawing on the service-dominant logic perspective, this study examines consumers’ willingness to participate in logistics value co-creation by focusing on the dual motives of individualising and relating, the mediating role of resource integration tendency, and the moderating effects of two logistics scenarios: self-collection and social delivery. Structural equation modelling (n = 500) reveals that while both motives positively influence consumer participation, resource integration tendency unexpectedly plays a negative mediating role. Additionally, the results demonstrate contextual differences: the individualising motive is more influential in self-collection, whereas the relating motive dominates in social delivery.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":\"200 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115624\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325004473\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325004473","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现代物流服务已经将最后一英里的配送重塑为充满活力的市场,消费者可以直接通过自我收集或帮助他人进行社会化配送。这一转变标志着物流向以消费者为中心的转变,它认识到消费者参与和价值共同创造的必要性。本研究基于服务主导的逻辑视角,从个性化和关联的双重动机、资源整合倾向的中介作用、自我收集和社会配送两种物流场景的调节作用等方面考察了消费者参与物流价值共同创造的意愿。结构方程模型(n = 500)显示,两种动机均对消费者参与有正向影响,但资源整合倾向意外地起负向中介作用。此外,结果还显示了情境差异:个性化动机在自我收集中更有影响力,而相关动机在社会交付中占主导地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transforming last-mile delivery into marketplaces of logistics services: An investigation on consumer participation motives, resources, and contextual differences
Contemporary logistics services have reshaped last-mile delivery into dynamic marketplaces, where consumers engage directly through self-collection or by assisting others in social delivery. This shift signals a move towards consumer-centrism in logistics, which recognises the necessity of consumer participation and value co-creation. Drawing on the service-dominant logic perspective, this study examines consumers’ willingness to participate in logistics value co-creation by focusing on the dual motives of individualising and relating, the mediating role of resource integration tendency, and the moderating effects of two logistics scenarios: self-collection and social delivery. Structural equation modelling (n = 500) reveals that while both motives positively influence consumer participation, resource integration tendency unexpectedly plays a negative mediating role. Additionally, the results demonstrate contextual differences: the individualising motive is more influential in self-collection, whereas the relating motive dominates in social delivery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信