John Muscedere , Carrie L. Shorey , Gustavo Duque , Perry Kim , Amanda L. Lorbergs , Chris McGlory , Reshma A. Merchant , John C. Newman , Yves Rolland , Bruno Vellas
{"title":"推进老年科学研究——老年治疗药物监管环境的范围综述","authors":"John Muscedere , Carrie L. Shorey , Gustavo Duque , Perry Kim , Amanda L. Lorbergs , Chris McGlory , Reshma A. Merchant , John C. Newman , Yves Rolland , Bruno Vellas","doi":"10.1016/j.jnha.2025.100637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Globally, older adults are living longer but often in poorer health with multiple chronic conditions straining healthcare systems. Gerotherapeutics, which target the biological mechanisms of aging, could reduce this burden by extending healthspan. However, before therapies can be adopted, they must undergo rigorous study and regulatory approval; existing regulatory frameworks and the barriers to their development are unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We conducted a scoping review of geroscience regulatory frameworks and identified barriers to their development.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive government, academic, and grey literature search in the United States, Europe, Canada, and other regions including Medline and EMBASE (via OVID), Google Scholar, CINAHL, and CADTH Grey Matters was conducted. For inclusion of only recent literature, searches were limited to English-language publications from 2014 to 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In 3,780 publications screened for inclusion, no regulatory frameworks for gerotherapeutics were found. In the 34 included publications, 4 major barriers were identified: 1) lack of recognition of the biological processes of aging as targets for medical intervention; 2) absence of clear regulatory pathways to evaluate aging-focused therapies; 3) economic uncertainties, including high development costs and limited incentives due to unclear regulatory environments; and 4) insufficient public and policy engagement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We did not identify any geroscience specific regulatory frameworks but identified barriers to their development. For biological aging to advance as a therapeutic target, stakeholders must develop comprehensive regulatory guidelines, incentivize research and conduct public education. Global collaboration is crucial to harmonize regulatory efforts and ensure equitable adoption of therapies, ultimately enhancing healthspan worldwide.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Health & Aging","volume":"29 9","pages":"Article 100637"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing Geroscience Research – A Scoping Review of Regulatory Environments for Gerotherapeutics\",\"authors\":\"John Muscedere , Carrie L. Shorey , Gustavo Duque , Perry Kim , Amanda L. Lorbergs , Chris McGlory , Reshma A. Merchant , John C. Newman , Yves Rolland , Bruno Vellas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnha.2025.100637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Globally, older adults are living longer but often in poorer health with multiple chronic conditions straining healthcare systems. Gerotherapeutics, which target the biological mechanisms of aging, could reduce this burden by extending healthspan. However, before therapies can be adopted, they must undergo rigorous study and regulatory approval; existing regulatory frameworks and the barriers to their development are unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We conducted a scoping review of geroscience regulatory frameworks and identified barriers to their development.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive government, academic, and grey literature search in the United States, Europe, Canada, and other regions including Medline and EMBASE (via OVID), Google Scholar, CINAHL, and CADTH Grey Matters was conducted. For inclusion of only recent literature, searches were limited to English-language publications from 2014 to 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In 3,780 publications screened for inclusion, no regulatory frameworks for gerotherapeutics were found. In the 34 included publications, 4 major barriers were identified: 1) lack of recognition of the biological processes of aging as targets for medical intervention; 2) absence of clear regulatory pathways to evaluate aging-focused therapies; 3) economic uncertainties, including high development costs and limited incentives due to unclear regulatory environments; and 4) insufficient public and policy engagement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We did not identify any geroscience specific regulatory frameworks but identified barriers to their development. For biological aging to advance as a therapeutic target, stakeholders must develop comprehensive regulatory guidelines, incentivize research and conduct public education. Global collaboration is crucial to harmonize regulatory efforts and ensure equitable adoption of therapies, ultimately enhancing healthspan worldwide.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition Health & Aging\",\"volume\":\"29 9\",\"pages\":\"Article 100637\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition Health & Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1279770725001629\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Health & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1279770725001629","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Advancing Geroscience Research – A Scoping Review of Regulatory Environments for Gerotherapeutics
Background
Globally, older adults are living longer but often in poorer health with multiple chronic conditions straining healthcare systems. Gerotherapeutics, which target the biological mechanisms of aging, could reduce this burden by extending healthspan. However, before therapies can be adopted, they must undergo rigorous study and regulatory approval; existing regulatory frameworks and the barriers to their development are unknown.
Objective
We conducted a scoping review of geroscience regulatory frameworks and identified barriers to their development.
Methods
A comprehensive government, academic, and grey literature search in the United States, Europe, Canada, and other regions including Medline and EMBASE (via OVID), Google Scholar, CINAHL, and CADTH Grey Matters was conducted. For inclusion of only recent literature, searches were limited to English-language publications from 2014 to 2024.
Results
In 3,780 publications screened for inclusion, no regulatory frameworks for gerotherapeutics were found. In the 34 included publications, 4 major barriers were identified: 1) lack of recognition of the biological processes of aging as targets for medical intervention; 2) absence of clear regulatory pathways to evaluate aging-focused therapies; 3) economic uncertainties, including high development costs and limited incentives due to unclear regulatory environments; and 4) insufficient public and policy engagement.
Conclusion
We did not identify any geroscience specific regulatory frameworks but identified barriers to their development. For biological aging to advance as a therapeutic target, stakeholders must develop comprehensive regulatory guidelines, incentivize research and conduct public education. Global collaboration is crucial to harmonize regulatory efforts and ensure equitable adoption of therapies, ultimately enhancing healthspan worldwide.
期刊介绍:
There is increasing scientific and clinical interest in the interactions of nutrition and health as part of the aging process. This interest is due to the important role that nutrition plays throughout the life span. This role affects the growth and development of the body during childhood, affects the risk of acute and chronic diseases, the maintenance of physiological processes and the biological process of aging. A major aim of "The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging" is to contribute to the improvement of knowledge regarding the relationships between nutrition and the aging process from birth to old age.