{"title":"2019冠状病毒病大流行期间挪威关闭:危机可操作性和失控","authors":"André R. Karlsen PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>COVID-19 is one of the deadliest crises in modern times, having infected and caused deaths to millions. Despite a long history of managing pandemics, COVID-19 revealed gaps in our crisis management knowledge. A crisis is a serious threat to the fundamental values and norms of a system, demanding critical decisions under time pressure and highly uncertain circumstances. Yet, as investigations in Norway indicate, it was the perceived loss of control, rather than the characteristics of a crisis that defined the pandemic as a crisis. This paper aims to study losing control in relation to pandemics, and what it means for crisis management. The data used to answer this were gathered from the COVID-19 management that culminated in Norwegian national lockdown March 12th, 2020. Through a thematic analysis, I present some ‘strains’ of losing control: the findings are that the ‘nexus’ of our worries in losing control relates to uncertainty, criticality and urgency. For example, the lacking data for modeling the virus. Further, this is coupled with an acknowledgement that there are things we want to protect. For example, when the system that protects health and well-being is being pressured, it can lead to a sense of lacking control over the situation. I conceptualize that the core of the problem with losing control is an experience of decreasing ‘crisis maneuverability’, and then how it makes sense to talk about degrees of ‘uncontrol’ to explain what makes us recognize when a threat becomes a crisis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 105705"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Norwegian closedown during the COVID-19 pandemic: Crisis maneuverability and uncontrol\",\"authors\":\"André R. Karlsen PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>COVID-19 is one of the deadliest crises in modern times, having infected and caused deaths to millions. Despite a long history of managing pandemics, COVID-19 revealed gaps in our crisis management knowledge. A crisis is a serious threat to the fundamental values and norms of a system, demanding critical decisions under time pressure and highly uncertain circumstances. Yet, as investigations in Norway indicate, it was the perceived loss of control, rather than the characteristics of a crisis that defined the pandemic as a crisis. This paper aims to study losing control in relation to pandemics, and what it means for crisis management. The data used to answer this were gathered from the COVID-19 management that culminated in Norwegian national lockdown March 12th, 2020. Through a thematic analysis, I present some ‘strains’ of losing control: the findings are that the ‘nexus’ of our worries in losing control relates to uncertainty, criticality and urgency. For example, the lacking data for modeling the virus. Further, this is coupled with an acknowledgement that there are things we want to protect. For example, when the system that protects health and well-being is being pressured, it can lead to a sense of lacking control over the situation. I conceptualize that the core of the problem with losing control is an experience of decreasing ‘crisis maneuverability’, and then how it makes sense to talk about degrees of ‘uncontrol’ to explain what makes us recognize when a threat becomes a crisis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"volume\":\"128 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105705\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925005291\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925005291","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Norwegian closedown during the COVID-19 pandemic: Crisis maneuverability and uncontrol
COVID-19 is one of the deadliest crises in modern times, having infected and caused deaths to millions. Despite a long history of managing pandemics, COVID-19 revealed gaps in our crisis management knowledge. A crisis is a serious threat to the fundamental values and norms of a system, demanding critical decisions under time pressure and highly uncertain circumstances. Yet, as investigations in Norway indicate, it was the perceived loss of control, rather than the characteristics of a crisis that defined the pandemic as a crisis. This paper aims to study losing control in relation to pandemics, and what it means for crisis management. The data used to answer this were gathered from the COVID-19 management that culminated in Norwegian national lockdown March 12th, 2020. Through a thematic analysis, I present some ‘strains’ of losing control: the findings are that the ‘nexus’ of our worries in losing control relates to uncertainty, criticality and urgency. For example, the lacking data for modeling the virus. Further, this is coupled with an acknowledgement that there are things we want to protect. For example, when the system that protects health and well-being is being pressured, it can lead to a sense of lacking control over the situation. I conceptualize that the core of the problem with losing control is an experience of decreasing ‘crisis maneuverability’, and then how it makes sense to talk about degrees of ‘uncontrol’ to explain what makes us recognize when a threat becomes a crisis.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international.
Key topics:-
-multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters
-the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques
-discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels
-disasters associated with climate change
-vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends
-emerging risks
-resilience against disasters.
The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.