采石场副产品在膏体和砂浆中部分替代波特兰水泥的比较

Tu-Nam Nguyen , Michael Lowry , Thien Q. Tran , Ketki Phadke , Elizabeth Bise , Alexander S. Brand
{"title":"采石场副产品在膏体和砂浆中部分替代波特兰水泥的比较","authors":"Tu-Nam Nguyen ,&nbsp;Michael Lowry ,&nbsp;Thien Q. Tran ,&nbsp;Ketki Phadke ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Bise ,&nbsp;Alexander S. Brand","doi":"10.1016/j.cement.2025.100152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Quarry by-products (QB), including screenings, pond fines, and baghouse fines, present a significant surplus, since they are not significantly utilized in other markets and industries. This study explores the use of seven different QB as direct replacements of limestone powder in a portland limestone cement for paste and mortar applications. Cement replacements ranging from 5 % to 20 % by volume were explored, and testing included compressive and flexural strengths, isothermal calorimetry, pore solution analysis, alkali-silica reaction, and reactivity analysis. Expectedly, the results demonstrated that not all QB yielded equivalent performance. All mortars with 5 % and 15 % QB substitution had lower compressive strengths than the control, with the 15 % QB substitution performing worse. However, the mortars with QB had higher flexural strengths than the control. The 5 %, 10 %, 15 %, and 20 % QB substitution samples decreased the cumulative heat at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, with a higher substitution having a stronger decreasing effect. QB 2 and QB 7 were found to only slightly decrease the cumulative heat at 5 % substitution. Furthermore, QB 2 was found to significantly accelerate the silicate and aluminate heat evolution peaks, while QB 1, QB 3, QB 4, QB 5, and QB 7 only slightly accelerated the silicate and/or aluminate peaks. The pore solution of mortars with 5 % and 15 % QB substitution were found to have a lower pH and, in general, increased calcium and silicon contents. QB 2 was found to be moderately ASR reactive, while QB 7 was found to be ASR reactive. All QB were found to be non-pozzolanic; however, they may still be of use in other portland cement applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100225,"journal":{"name":"CEMENT","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparisons of quarry by-products as a partial replacement of portland cement in pastes and mortars\",\"authors\":\"Tu-Nam Nguyen ,&nbsp;Michael Lowry ,&nbsp;Thien Q. Tran ,&nbsp;Ketki Phadke ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Bise ,&nbsp;Alexander S. Brand\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cement.2025.100152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Quarry by-products (QB), including screenings, pond fines, and baghouse fines, present a significant surplus, since they are not significantly utilized in other markets and industries. This study explores the use of seven different QB as direct replacements of limestone powder in a portland limestone cement for paste and mortar applications. Cement replacements ranging from 5 % to 20 % by volume were explored, and testing included compressive and flexural strengths, isothermal calorimetry, pore solution analysis, alkali-silica reaction, and reactivity analysis. Expectedly, the results demonstrated that not all QB yielded equivalent performance. All mortars with 5 % and 15 % QB substitution had lower compressive strengths than the control, with the 15 % QB substitution performing worse. However, the mortars with QB had higher flexural strengths than the control. The 5 %, 10 %, 15 %, and 20 % QB substitution samples decreased the cumulative heat at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, with a higher substitution having a stronger decreasing effect. QB 2 and QB 7 were found to only slightly decrease the cumulative heat at 5 % substitution. Furthermore, QB 2 was found to significantly accelerate the silicate and aluminate heat evolution peaks, while QB 1, QB 3, QB 4, QB 5, and QB 7 only slightly accelerated the silicate and/or aluminate peaks. The pore solution of mortars with 5 % and 15 % QB substitution were found to have a lower pH and, in general, increased calcium and silicon contents. QB 2 was found to be moderately ASR reactive, while QB 7 was found to be ASR reactive. All QB were found to be non-pozzolanic; however, they may still be of use in other portland cement applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CEMENT\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CEMENT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666549225000258\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666549225000258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采石场副产品(QB),包括筛分、池粉和袋粉,呈现出显著的盈余,因为它们在其他市场和工业中没有得到显著利用。本研究探讨了七种不同的QB作为石灰石粉在波特兰石灰石水泥中的直接替代品,用于膏体和砂浆应用。水泥替代量从5%到20%不等,测试包括抗压和抗弯强度、等温量热法、孔溶液分析、碱-硅反应和反应性分析。意料之中的是,结果表明并非所有QB都产生了相同的性能。5%和15% QB替代砂浆的抗压强度均低于对照,15% QB替代砂浆的抗压强度更差。但掺加QB的砂浆抗折强度高于对照。5%、10%、15%和20% QB取代的样品在24 h、48 h和72 h时降低累积热量,取代率越高,降低效果越强。qb2和qb7在5%的取代量下仅能略微降低累积热量。此外,QB 2被发现明显加快硅酸盐和铝酸盐放热峰,而QB 1, QB 3, QB 4、QB 5, QB 7稍微加快了硅酸铝酸和/或峰值。QB取代率为5%和15%的砂浆孔隙溶液pH值较低,钙和硅含量总体上有所增加。发现qb2具有中度ASR反应,而qb7具有ASR反应。所有QB均为非火山灰;然而,它们可能仍然在其他波特兰水泥应用中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparisons of quarry by-products as a partial replacement of portland cement in pastes and mortars
Quarry by-products (QB), including screenings, pond fines, and baghouse fines, present a significant surplus, since they are not significantly utilized in other markets and industries. This study explores the use of seven different QB as direct replacements of limestone powder in a portland limestone cement for paste and mortar applications. Cement replacements ranging from 5 % to 20 % by volume were explored, and testing included compressive and flexural strengths, isothermal calorimetry, pore solution analysis, alkali-silica reaction, and reactivity analysis. Expectedly, the results demonstrated that not all QB yielded equivalent performance. All mortars with 5 % and 15 % QB substitution had lower compressive strengths than the control, with the 15 % QB substitution performing worse. However, the mortars with QB had higher flexural strengths than the control. The 5 %, 10 %, 15 %, and 20 % QB substitution samples decreased the cumulative heat at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, with a higher substitution having a stronger decreasing effect. QB 2 and QB 7 were found to only slightly decrease the cumulative heat at 5 % substitution. Furthermore, QB 2 was found to significantly accelerate the silicate and aluminate heat evolution peaks, while QB 1, QB 3, QB 4, QB 5, and QB 7 only slightly accelerated the silicate and/or aluminate peaks. The pore solution of mortars with 5 % and 15 % QB substitution were found to have a lower pH and, in general, increased calcium and silicon contents. QB 2 was found to be moderately ASR reactive, while QB 7 was found to be ASR reactive. All QB were found to be non-pozzolanic; however, they may still be of use in other portland cement applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信