Frank Piedra-Jimenez , Diego Broz , Juan M. Novas , Ignacio E. Grossmann , Maria Analia Rodriguez
{"title":"优化森林规划:通过多目标分离公式平衡木材生产和碳封存","authors":"Frank Piedra-Jimenez , Diego Broz , Juan M. Novas , Ignacio E. Grossmann , Maria Analia Rodriguez","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This work introduces a multi-objective model for the Forest Planning Problem (FPP), designed to optimize forest management by determining the best combination of silvicultural treatments, land harvesting proportions, net carbon sequestration, and timber flow. Using Generalized Disjunctive Programming (GDP), the model addresses two conflicting objectives: maximizing net present value and maximizing <span><math><mrow><mi>C</mi><msub><mrow><mi>O</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> sequestration, while accounting for carbon sequestration losses from third parties. The model is reformulated as a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) problem using both Hull reformulation and Big-M reformulation and validated with data from a forest company in Misiones, Argentina. Results show that increasing forest area reduces reliance on external timber, and that stand characteristics and diverse prescriptions are more effective for improving <span><math><mrow><mi>C</mi><msub><mrow><mi>O</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> sequestration than simply expanding forest area. Additionally, the Hull reformulation proves more robust for complex problems, while Big-M is advantageous for simpler cases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 103575"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing forest planning: Balancing timber production and carbon sequestration through a multi-objective disjunctive formulation\",\"authors\":\"Frank Piedra-Jimenez , Diego Broz , Juan M. Novas , Ignacio E. Grossmann , Maria Analia Rodriguez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This work introduces a multi-objective model for the Forest Planning Problem (FPP), designed to optimize forest management by determining the best combination of silvicultural treatments, land harvesting proportions, net carbon sequestration, and timber flow. Using Generalized Disjunctive Programming (GDP), the model addresses two conflicting objectives: maximizing net present value and maximizing <span><math><mrow><mi>C</mi><msub><mrow><mi>O</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> sequestration, while accounting for carbon sequestration losses from third parties. The model is reformulated as a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) problem using both Hull reformulation and Big-M reformulation and validated with data from a forest company in Misiones, Argentina. Results show that increasing forest area reduces reliance on external timber, and that stand characteristics and diverse prescriptions are more effective for improving <span><math><mrow><mi>C</mi><msub><mrow><mi>O</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> sequestration than simply expanding forest area. Additionally, the Hull reformulation proves more robust for complex problems, while Big-M is advantageous for simpler cases.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"volume\":\"178 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103575\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125001546\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125001546","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimizing forest planning: Balancing timber production and carbon sequestration through a multi-objective disjunctive formulation
This work introduces a multi-objective model for the Forest Planning Problem (FPP), designed to optimize forest management by determining the best combination of silvicultural treatments, land harvesting proportions, net carbon sequestration, and timber flow. Using Generalized Disjunctive Programming (GDP), the model addresses two conflicting objectives: maximizing net present value and maximizing sequestration, while accounting for carbon sequestration losses from third parties. The model is reformulated as a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) problem using both Hull reformulation and Big-M reformulation and validated with data from a forest company in Misiones, Argentina. Results show that increasing forest area reduces reliance on external timber, and that stand characteristics and diverse prescriptions are more effective for improving sequestration than simply expanding forest area. Additionally, the Hull reformulation proves more robust for complex problems, while Big-M is advantageous for simpler cases.
期刊介绍:
Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.