评估移动医疗中患者满意度的综合工具:数字医疗应用满意度量表的开发和验证

G.Hari Prakash , D. Sunil Kumar , PK Kiran , Vanishri Arun , Deepika Yadav , Arun Gopi , Praveen Kulkarni , M. Rakesh
{"title":"评估移动医疗中患者满意度的综合工具:数字医疗应用满意度量表的开发和验证","authors":"G.Hari Prakash ,&nbsp;D. Sunil Kumar ,&nbsp;PK Kiran ,&nbsp;Vanishri Arun ,&nbsp;Deepika Yadav ,&nbsp;Arun Gopi ,&nbsp;Praveen Kulkarni ,&nbsp;M. Rakesh","doi":"10.1016/j.ymecc.2025.100017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Digital health applications have emerged as vital tools in healthcare delivery, particularly for older cancer patients. However, there is a lack of validated tools to assess user satisfaction with these platforms. This study aimed to develop and validate the Digital Health Application Satisfaction Scale for Patients (DHASSP) to evaluate patient satisfaction across key domains such as ease of use, quality of life impact, and emotional engagement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This mixed-methods study included expert consultations, item development, content validation using 28 experts, and pilot testing with 40 oncology patients. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and reliability tests were performed to evaluate the scale’s psychometric properties.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The DHASSP exhibited strong content validity (S-CVI/Ave = 0.857) and excellent reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.907). EFA revealed a four-factor structure, accounting for 67.35 % of the variance. The Quality-of-Life domain demonstrated the highest reliability (α = 0.795), while technical aspects scored lower (α = 0.551).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The DHASSP provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating satisfaction with digital health platforms, addressing usability, emotional engagement, and impact on quality of life. Its validation contributes to advancing the use of ICT in clinical care, particularly in oncology settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100896,"journal":{"name":"Measurement and Evaluations in Cancer Care","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100017"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comprehensive tool for evaluating patient satisfaction in mhealth: Development and validation of the digital health application satisfaction scale\",\"authors\":\"G.Hari Prakash ,&nbsp;D. Sunil Kumar ,&nbsp;PK Kiran ,&nbsp;Vanishri Arun ,&nbsp;Deepika Yadav ,&nbsp;Arun Gopi ,&nbsp;Praveen Kulkarni ,&nbsp;M. Rakesh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ymecc.2025.100017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Digital health applications have emerged as vital tools in healthcare delivery, particularly for older cancer patients. However, there is a lack of validated tools to assess user satisfaction with these platforms. This study aimed to develop and validate the Digital Health Application Satisfaction Scale for Patients (DHASSP) to evaluate patient satisfaction across key domains such as ease of use, quality of life impact, and emotional engagement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This mixed-methods study included expert consultations, item development, content validation using 28 experts, and pilot testing with 40 oncology patients. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and reliability tests were performed to evaluate the scale’s psychometric properties.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The DHASSP exhibited strong content validity (S-CVI/Ave = 0.857) and excellent reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.907). EFA revealed a four-factor structure, accounting for 67.35 % of the variance. The Quality-of-Life domain demonstrated the highest reliability (α = 0.795), while technical aspects scored lower (α = 0.551).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The DHASSP provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating satisfaction with digital health platforms, addressing usability, emotional engagement, and impact on quality of life. Its validation contributes to advancing the use of ICT in clinical care, particularly in oncology settings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Measurement and Evaluations in Cancer Care\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100017\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Measurement and Evaluations in Cancer Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294987752500005X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement and Evaluations in Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294987752500005X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字健康应用程序已成为医疗保健服务的重要工具,特别是对老年癌症患者而言。然而,缺乏有效的工具来评估用户对这些平台的满意度。本研究旨在开发和验证患者数字健康应用满意度量表(DHASSP),以评估患者在易用性、生活质量影响和情感参与等关键领域的满意度。方法采用混合方法进行研究,包括专家咨询、项目开发、28位专家的内容验证和40例肿瘤患者的中试。采用探索性因子分析(EFA)和信度检验来评价量表的心理测量特性。结果DHASSP具有较强的内容效度(S-CVI/Ave = 0.857)和优良的信度(Cronbach’s α = 0.907)。EFA呈现四因子结构,占方差的67.35 %。生活质量领域表现出最高的可靠性(α = 0.795),而技术方面得分较低(α = 0.551)。DHASSP为评估数字健康平台的满意度、解决可用性、情感参与和对生活质量的影响提供了一个全面的框架。它的验证有助于推进ICT在临床护理中的应用,特别是在肿瘤学领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comprehensive tool for evaluating patient satisfaction in mhealth: Development and validation of the digital health application satisfaction scale

Aim

Digital health applications have emerged as vital tools in healthcare delivery, particularly for older cancer patients. However, there is a lack of validated tools to assess user satisfaction with these platforms. This study aimed to develop and validate the Digital Health Application Satisfaction Scale for Patients (DHASSP) to evaluate patient satisfaction across key domains such as ease of use, quality of life impact, and emotional engagement.

Methods

This mixed-methods study included expert consultations, item development, content validation using 28 experts, and pilot testing with 40 oncology patients. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and reliability tests were performed to evaluate the scale’s psychometric properties.

Results

The DHASSP exhibited strong content validity (S-CVI/Ave = 0.857) and excellent reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.907). EFA revealed a four-factor structure, accounting for 67.35 % of the variance. The Quality-of-Life domain demonstrated the highest reliability (α = 0.795), while technical aspects scored lower (α = 0.551).

Conclusions

The DHASSP provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating satisfaction with digital health platforms, addressing usability, emotional engagement, and impact on quality of life. Its validation contributes to advancing the use of ICT in clinical care, particularly in oncology settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信