{"title":"评估移动医疗中患者满意度的综合工具:数字医疗应用满意度量表的开发和验证","authors":"G.Hari Prakash , D. Sunil Kumar , PK Kiran , Vanishri Arun , Deepika Yadav , Arun Gopi , Praveen Kulkarni , M. Rakesh","doi":"10.1016/j.ymecc.2025.100017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Digital health applications have emerged as vital tools in healthcare delivery, particularly for older cancer patients. However, there is a lack of validated tools to assess user satisfaction with these platforms. This study aimed to develop and validate the Digital Health Application Satisfaction Scale for Patients (DHASSP) to evaluate patient satisfaction across key domains such as ease of use, quality of life impact, and emotional engagement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This mixed-methods study included expert consultations, item development, content validation using 28 experts, and pilot testing with 40 oncology patients. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and reliability tests were performed to evaluate the scale’s psychometric properties.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The DHASSP exhibited strong content validity (S-CVI/Ave = 0.857) and excellent reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.907). EFA revealed a four-factor structure, accounting for 67.35 % of the variance. The Quality-of-Life domain demonstrated the highest reliability (α = 0.795), while technical aspects scored lower (α = 0.551).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The DHASSP provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating satisfaction with digital health platforms, addressing usability, emotional engagement, and impact on quality of life. Its validation contributes to advancing the use of ICT in clinical care, particularly in oncology settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100896,"journal":{"name":"Measurement and Evaluations in Cancer Care","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100017"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comprehensive tool for evaluating patient satisfaction in mhealth: Development and validation of the digital health application satisfaction scale\",\"authors\":\"G.Hari Prakash , D. Sunil Kumar , PK Kiran , Vanishri Arun , Deepika Yadav , Arun Gopi , Praveen Kulkarni , M. Rakesh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ymecc.2025.100017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Digital health applications have emerged as vital tools in healthcare delivery, particularly for older cancer patients. However, there is a lack of validated tools to assess user satisfaction with these platforms. This study aimed to develop and validate the Digital Health Application Satisfaction Scale for Patients (DHASSP) to evaluate patient satisfaction across key domains such as ease of use, quality of life impact, and emotional engagement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This mixed-methods study included expert consultations, item development, content validation using 28 experts, and pilot testing with 40 oncology patients. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and reliability tests were performed to evaluate the scale’s psychometric properties.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The DHASSP exhibited strong content validity (S-CVI/Ave = 0.857) and excellent reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.907). EFA revealed a four-factor structure, accounting for 67.35 % of the variance. The Quality-of-Life domain demonstrated the highest reliability (α = 0.795), while technical aspects scored lower (α = 0.551).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The DHASSP provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating satisfaction with digital health platforms, addressing usability, emotional engagement, and impact on quality of life. Its validation contributes to advancing the use of ICT in clinical care, particularly in oncology settings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Measurement and Evaluations in Cancer Care\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100017\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Measurement and Evaluations in Cancer Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294987752500005X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement and Evaluations in Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294987752500005X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comprehensive tool for evaluating patient satisfaction in mhealth: Development and validation of the digital health application satisfaction scale
Aim
Digital health applications have emerged as vital tools in healthcare delivery, particularly for older cancer patients. However, there is a lack of validated tools to assess user satisfaction with these platforms. This study aimed to develop and validate the Digital Health Application Satisfaction Scale for Patients (DHASSP) to evaluate patient satisfaction across key domains such as ease of use, quality of life impact, and emotional engagement.
Methods
This mixed-methods study included expert consultations, item development, content validation using 28 experts, and pilot testing with 40 oncology patients. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and reliability tests were performed to evaluate the scale’s psychometric properties.
Results
The DHASSP exhibited strong content validity (S-CVI/Ave = 0.857) and excellent reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.907). EFA revealed a four-factor structure, accounting for 67.35 % of the variance. The Quality-of-Life domain demonstrated the highest reliability (α = 0.795), while technical aspects scored lower (α = 0.551).
Conclusions
The DHASSP provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating satisfaction with digital health platforms, addressing usability, emotional engagement, and impact on quality of life. Its validation contributes to advancing the use of ICT in clinical care, particularly in oncology settings.