针对胸椎侧凸畸形患者的院内患者特异性3D打印手术指南,工程师和外科医生的合作。

IF 3.1 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
M Suffo, M Quiroga-De Castro, L Galán-Romero, P Andrés-Cano
{"title":"针对胸椎侧凸畸形患者的院内患者特异性3D打印手术指南,工程师和外科医生的合作。","authors":"M Suffo, M Quiroga-De Castro, L Galán-Romero, P Andrés-Cano","doi":"10.1186/s41205-025-00279-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study validates the intra-hospital design and 3D printing process of personalized surgical guides to enhance the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion in patients with thoracic scoliotic deformities. It introduces a novel collaborative paradigm between surgeons and engineers, aiming to improve efficiency and reduce errors in the manufacturing of patient-specific instruments (PSIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The process began with the generation of 3D biomodels of vertebrae from computed tomography scans. Surgical guides were then created using two 3D printing techniques: Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) with polylactic acid (PLA) and Stereolithography (SLA) with photopolymer resin. Three different prototypes were compared based on multifactorial indicators, including economic cost, macroscopic surface finish, and mechanical stability. The mechanical performance of the guides was evaluated under loads generated during pedicle screw penetration and threading.</p><p><strong>Results and discussions: </strong>PLA models printed using FFF were found to be cheaper and simpler to manufacture than SLA resin models. Despite differences observed under a microscope, PLA models exhibited a macroscopic surface finish comparable to that of SLA resin models. Both materials demonstrated similar mechanical properties, although their values were lower than those reported in the manufacturer's datasheet. Importantly, both types of guides successfully withstood the mechanical loads generated during surgical procedures. The intra-hospital collaboration between engineers and surgeons was identified as a key factor in improving outcomes and reducing error risks, showcasing the benefits of interdisciplinary teamwork.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>3D-printed PSIs made from PLA using FFF are more cost-effective and quicker to produce compared to SLA resin models, while achieving similar results in surface finish and mechanical stability. The implementation of a collaborative approach between engineers and surgeons within hospital settings enhances the efficiency and accuracy of patient-specific surgical guide manufacturing, offering a promising solution for improving surgical outcomes in thoracic scoliotic deformities.</p>","PeriodicalId":72036,"journal":{"name":"3D printing in medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12281761/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intra-hospital patient-specific 3D printed surgical guide for patients with thoracic scoliotic deformities, the collaboration between engineer and surgeon.\",\"authors\":\"M Suffo, M Quiroga-De Castro, L Galán-Romero, P Andrés-Cano\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41205-025-00279-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study validates the intra-hospital design and 3D printing process of personalized surgical guides to enhance the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion in patients with thoracic scoliotic deformities. It introduces a novel collaborative paradigm between surgeons and engineers, aiming to improve efficiency and reduce errors in the manufacturing of patient-specific instruments (PSIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The process began with the generation of 3D biomodels of vertebrae from computed tomography scans. Surgical guides were then created using two 3D printing techniques: Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) with polylactic acid (PLA) and Stereolithography (SLA) with photopolymer resin. Three different prototypes were compared based on multifactorial indicators, including economic cost, macroscopic surface finish, and mechanical stability. The mechanical performance of the guides was evaluated under loads generated during pedicle screw penetration and threading.</p><p><strong>Results and discussions: </strong>PLA models printed using FFF were found to be cheaper and simpler to manufacture than SLA resin models. Despite differences observed under a microscope, PLA models exhibited a macroscopic surface finish comparable to that of SLA resin models. Both materials demonstrated similar mechanical properties, although their values were lower than those reported in the manufacturer's datasheet. Importantly, both types of guides successfully withstood the mechanical loads generated during surgical procedures. The intra-hospital collaboration between engineers and surgeons was identified as a key factor in improving outcomes and reducing error risks, showcasing the benefits of interdisciplinary teamwork.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>3D-printed PSIs made from PLA using FFF are more cost-effective and quicker to produce compared to SLA resin models, while achieving similar results in surface finish and mechanical stability. The implementation of a collaborative approach between engineers and surgeons within hospital settings enhances the efficiency and accuracy of patient-specific surgical guide manufacturing, offering a promising solution for improving surgical outcomes in thoracic scoliotic deformities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"3D printing in medicine\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12281761/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"3D printing in medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-025-00279-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"3D printing in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-025-00279-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究验证了个性化手术导向器的院内设计和3D打印工艺,以提高胸椎侧凸畸形患者椎弓根螺钉置入的准确性。它在外科医生和工程师之间引入了一种新的合作模式,旨在提高效率并减少制造患者专用仪器(psi)的错误。方法:该过程从计算机断层扫描生成椎体三维生物模型开始。然后使用两种3D打印技术创建手术指南:使用聚乳酸(PLA)的熔融丝制造(FFF)和光聚合物树脂的立体光刻(SLA)。基于多因素指标,包括经济成本、宏观表面光洁度和机械稳定性,对三种不同的原型进行了比较。在椎弓根螺钉穿透和穿线过程中产生的载荷作用下,评估了导钉的机械性能。结果和讨论:发现使用FFF打印的PLA模型比SLA树脂模型更便宜,更容易制造。尽管在显微镜下观察到差异,PLA模型的宏观表面光洁度与SLA树脂模型相当。两种材料表现出相似的机械性能,尽管它们的值低于制造商数据表中报告的值。重要的是,两种类型的导尿管都成功地承受了手术过程中产生的机械负荷。工程师和外科医生之间的医院内部协作被认为是改善结果和减少错误风险的关键因素,展示了跨学科团队合作的好处。结论:与SLA树脂模型相比,使用FFF由PLA制成的3d打印psi更具成本效益,生产速度更快,同时在表面光洁度和机械稳定性方面也取得了相似的结果。在医院环境中,工程师和外科医生之间的协作方法的实施提高了针对患者的手术指南制造的效率和准确性,为改善胸部脊柱侧凸畸形的手术结果提供了一个有希望的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Intra-hospital patient-specific 3D printed surgical guide for patients with thoracic scoliotic deformities, the collaboration between engineer and surgeon.

Intra-hospital patient-specific 3D printed surgical guide for patients with thoracic scoliotic deformities, the collaboration between engineer and surgeon.

Intra-hospital patient-specific 3D printed surgical guide for patients with thoracic scoliotic deformities, the collaboration between engineer and surgeon.

Intra-hospital patient-specific 3D printed surgical guide for patients with thoracic scoliotic deformities, the collaboration between engineer and surgeon.

Background: This study validates the intra-hospital design and 3D printing process of personalized surgical guides to enhance the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion in patients with thoracic scoliotic deformities. It introduces a novel collaborative paradigm between surgeons and engineers, aiming to improve efficiency and reduce errors in the manufacturing of patient-specific instruments (PSIs).

Methods: The process began with the generation of 3D biomodels of vertebrae from computed tomography scans. Surgical guides were then created using two 3D printing techniques: Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) with polylactic acid (PLA) and Stereolithography (SLA) with photopolymer resin. Three different prototypes were compared based on multifactorial indicators, including economic cost, macroscopic surface finish, and mechanical stability. The mechanical performance of the guides was evaluated under loads generated during pedicle screw penetration and threading.

Results and discussions: PLA models printed using FFF were found to be cheaper and simpler to manufacture than SLA resin models. Despite differences observed under a microscope, PLA models exhibited a macroscopic surface finish comparable to that of SLA resin models. Both materials demonstrated similar mechanical properties, although their values were lower than those reported in the manufacturer's datasheet. Importantly, both types of guides successfully withstood the mechanical loads generated during surgical procedures. The intra-hospital collaboration between engineers and surgeons was identified as a key factor in improving outcomes and reducing error risks, showcasing the benefits of interdisciplinary teamwork.

Conclusions: 3D-printed PSIs made from PLA using FFF are more cost-effective and quicker to produce compared to SLA resin models, while achieving similar results in surface finish and mechanical stability. The implementation of a collaborative approach between engineers and surgeons within hospital settings enhances the efficiency and accuracy of patient-specific surgical guide manufacturing, offering a promising solution for improving surgical outcomes in thoracic scoliotic deformities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信