使用基于姿势的深度学习模型对有和没有颈源性头痛或颈肩痛的办公室工作人员进行分类:一项多中心回顾性研究

IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2025-07-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpain.2025.1614143
Ui-Jae Hwang, Junghun Han, Oh-Yun Kwon, Yu Seong Chu, Sejung Yang
{"title":"使用基于姿势的深度学习模型对有和没有颈源性头痛或颈肩痛的办公室工作人员进行分类:一项多中心回顾性研究","authors":"Ui-Jae Hwang, Junghun Han, Oh-Yun Kwon, Yu Seong Chu, Sejung Yang","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1614143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and evaluate deep learning models for classifying office workers with and without cervicogenic headache (CH) and/or neck and shoulder pain (NSP), based on habitual sitting posture images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, retrospective, observational study analyzed 904 digital images of habitual sitting postures of 531 office workers. Three deep learning models (VGG19, ResNet50, and EfficientNet B5) were trained and evaluated to classify the CH, NSP, and combined CH + NSP. Model performance was assessed using 4-fold cross-validation with metrics including area under the curve (AUC), accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (Sen), specificity (Spe), and F1 score. Statistical significance was evaluated using 95% confidence intervals. Class Activation Mapping (CAM) was used to visualize the model focus areas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 531 office workers (135 with CH, 365 with NSP, 108 with both conditions and 139 control group), ResNet50 achieved the highest performance for CH classification with an AUC of 0.782 (95% CI: 0.770-0.793) and an accuracy of 0.750 (95% CI: 0.731-0.768). NSP classification showed more modest results, with ResNet50 achieving an accuracy of 0.677 (95% CI: 0.640-0.713). In the combined CH + NSP classification, EfficientNet B5 demonstrated the highest AUC of 0.744 (95% CI: 0.647-0.841). CAM analysis revealed distinct focus areas for each condition: the cervical region for CH, the lower body for NSP, and broader neck and trunk regions for combined CH + NSP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deep learning models show potential for classifying CH and NSP based on habitual sitting posture images, with varying performances across conditions. The ability of these models to detect subtle postural patterns associated with different musculoskeletal conditions suggests their possible applications for early detection and intervention. However, the complex relationship between static posture and musculoskeletal pain underscores the need for a multimodal assessment approach in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"6 ","pages":"1614143"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277355/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classifying office workers with and without cervicogenic headache or neck and shoulder pain using posture-based deep learning models: a multicenter retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Ui-Jae Hwang, Junghun Han, Oh-Yun Kwon, Yu Seong Chu, Sejung Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpain.2025.1614143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and evaluate deep learning models for classifying office workers with and without cervicogenic headache (CH) and/or neck and shoulder pain (NSP), based on habitual sitting posture images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, retrospective, observational study analyzed 904 digital images of habitual sitting postures of 531 office workers. Three deep learning models (VGG19, ResNet50, and EfficientNet B5) were trained and evaluated to classify the CH, NSP, and combined CH + NSP. Model performance was assessed using 4-fold cross-validation with metrics including area under the curve (AUC), accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (Sen), specificity (Spe), and F1 score. Statistical significance was evaluated using 95% confidence intervals. Class Activation Mapping (CAM) was used to visualize the model focus areas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 531 office workers (135 with CH, 365 with NSP, 108 with both conditions and 139 control group), ResNet50 achieved the highest performance for CH classification with an AUC of 0.782 (95% CI: 0.770-0.793) and an accuracy of 0.750 (95% CI: 0.731-0.768). NSP classification showed more modest results, with ResNet50 achieving an accuracy of 0.677 (95% CI: 0.640-0.713). In the combined CH + NSP classification, EfficientNet B5 demonstrated the highest AUC of 0.744 (95% CI: 0.647-0.841). CAM analysis revealed distinct focus areas for each condition: the cervical region for CH, the lower body for NSP, and broader neck and trunk regions for combined CH + NSP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deep learning models show potential for classifying CH and NSP based on habitual sitting posture images, with varying performances across conditions. The ability of these models to detect subtle postural patterns associated with different musculoskeletal conditions suggests their possible applications for early detection and intervention. However, the complex relationship between static posture and musculoskeletal pain underscores the need for a multimodal assessment approach in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"1614143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277355/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2025.1614143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2025.1614143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:开发和评估基于习惯性坐姿图像的深度学习模型,用于对办公室工作人员有无颈源性头痛(CH)和/或颈肩痛(NSP)进行分类。方法:采用多中心、回顾性、观察性研究方法,对531名上班族904张习惯坐姿的数字图像进行分析。对三个深度学习模型(VGG19、ResNet50和EfficientNet B5)进行训练和评估,对CH、NSP和CH + NSP组合进行分类。采用四重交叉验证评估模型性能,指标包括曲线下面积(AUC)、准确性(ACC)、敏感性(Sen)、特异性(Spe)和F1评分。采用95%置信区间评价统计学显著性。类激活映射(CAM)用于模型焦点区域的可视化。结果:在531名上班族中(ch135名,NSP 365名,两种情况均有108名,对照组139名),ResNet50在CH分类上的表现最高,AUC为0.782 (95% CI: 0.770-0.793),准确率为0.750 (95% CI: 0.731-0.768)。NSP分类结果较为温和,ResNet50的准确率为0.677 (95% CI: 0.640-0.713)。在CH + NSP联合分类中,effentnet B5的AUC最高,为0.744 (95% CI: 0.647-0.841)。CAM分析显示,每种疾病的病灶区域不同:CH的病灶区域为颈椎,NSP的病灶区域为下体,CH + NSP的病灶区域为颈部和躯干。结论:深度学习模型显示了基于习惯坐姿图像分类CH和NSP的潜力,在不同条件下表现不同。这些模型检测与不同肌肉骨骼状况相关的细微姿势模式的能力表明它们可能用于早期检测和干预。然而,静态姿势和肌肉骨骼疼痛之间的复杂关系强调了临床实践中多模式评估方法的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Classifying office workers with and without cervicogenic headache or neck and shoulder pain using posture-based deep learning models: a multicenter retrospective study.

Classifying office workers with and without cervicogenic headache or neck and shoulder pain using posture-based deep learning models: a multicenter retrospective study.

Classifying office workers with and without cervicogenic headache or neck and shoulder pain using posture-based deep learning models: a multicenter retrospective study.

Classifying office workers with and without cervicogenic headache or neck and shoulder pain using posture-based deep learning models: a multicenter retrospective study.

Objective: To develop and evaluate deep learning models for classifying office workers with and without cervicogenic headache (CH) and/or neck and shoulder pain (NSP), based on habitual sitting posture images.

Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, observational study analyzed 904 digital images of habitual sitting postures of 531 office workers. Three deep learning models (VGG19, ResNet50, and EfficientNet B5) were trained and evaluated to classify the CH, NSP, and combined CH + NSP. Model performance was assessed using 4-fold cross-validation with metrics including area under the curve (AUC), accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (Sen), specificity (Spe), and F1 score. Statistical significance was evaluated using 95% confidence intervals. Class Activation Mapping (CAM) was used to visualize the model focus areas.

Results: Among 531 office workers (135 with CH, 365 with NSP, 108 with both conditions and 139 control group), ResNet50 achieved the highest performance for CH classification with an AUC of 0.782 (95% CI: 0.770-0.793) and an accuracy of 0.750 (95% CI: 0.731-0.768). NSP classification showed more modest results, with ResNet50 achieving an accuracy of 0.677 (95% CI: 0.640-0.713). In the combined CH + NSP classification, EfficientNet B5 demonstrated the highest AUC of 0.744 (95% CI: 0.647-0.841). CAM analysis revealed distinct focus areas for each condition: the cervical region for CH, the lower body for NSP, and broader neck and trunk regions for combined CH + NSP.

Conclusion: Deep learning models show potential for classifying CH and NSP based on habitual sitting posture images, with varying performances across conditions. The ability of these models to detect subtle postural patterns associated with different musculoskeletal conditions suggests their possible applications for early detection and intervention. However, the complex relationship between static posture and musculoskeletal pain underscores the need for a multimodal assessment approach in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信