{"title":"学龄儿童精细运动测验与儿童运动评估量表(第二版)在中国疑似发育性协调障碍儿童中的关系","authors":"Haiyun Liu, Qiongxuan Chen, Shiyao Chen, Quting Huang, Chi-Wen Chien","doi":"10.1080/01942638.2025.2535340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine the correlation between a newly developed Fine Motor Test for the School-aged (FMTS) and the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition (MABC-2), and to explore the FMTS's ability to identify children with suspected developmental coordination disorder (DCD) compared to the MABC-2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-one children aged 7-14 years in Hong Kong participated. Each child was assessed with both the MABC-2 and FMTS, and their parents completed the revised Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ-R). Suspected DCD was identified using the 15th percentile for the MABC-2 and the 5th percentile for the FMTS using DCDQ-R cutoffs. Spearman's <i>rho</i> correlation analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Moderate-to-strong correlations (<i>rho</i> = .41-.70, <i>p</i> = .011 to <i>p</i> < .001) between the FMTS and MABC-2, except for the aiming and catching subtest, among children aged 7-10 years. The FMTS identified 20 children with suspected DCD, of whom 18 scored below DCDQ-R cutoffs, while the MABC-2 identified seven children with suspected DCD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FMTS demonstrates convergent validity and shows potential for aiding in the identification of DCD specifically related to fine motor difficulties in Hong Kong children. As the FMTS focuses solely on fine motor skills, combining it with gross motor assessments in clinical use is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":49138,"journal":{"name":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship Between the Fine Motor Test for the School-Aged and the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition in Chinese Children with Suspected Developmental Coordination Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Haiyun Liu, Qiongxuan Chen, Shiyao Chen, Quting Huang, Chi-Wen Chien\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01942638.2025.2535340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine the correlation between a newly developed Fine Motor Test for the School-aged (FMTS) and the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition (MABC-2), and to explore the FMTS's ability to identify children with suspected developmental coordination disorder (DCD) compared to the MABC-2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-one children aged 7-14 years in Hong Kong participated. Each child was assessed with both the MABC-2 and FMTS, and their parents completed the revised Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ-R). Suspected DCD was identified using the 15th percentile for the MABC-2 and the 5th percentile for the FMTS using DCDQ-R cutoffs. Spearman's <i>rho</i> correlation analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Moderate-to-strong correlations (<i>rho</i> = .41-.70, <i>p</i> = .011 to <i>p</i> < .001) between the FMTS and MABC-2, except for the aiming and catching subtest, among children aged 7-10 years. The FMTS identified 20 children with suspected DCD, of whom 18 scored below DCDQ-R cutoffs, while the MABC-2 identified seven children with suspected DCD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FMTS demonstrates convergent validity and shows potential for aiding in the identification of DCD specifically related to fine motor difficulties in Hong Kong children. As the FMTS focuses solely on fine motor skills, combining it with gross motor assessments in clinical use is recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2025.2535340\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2025.2535340","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:研究新开发的学龄精细运动测试(FMTS)与儿童运动评估量表第二版(MABC-2)之间的相关性,并探讨FMTS与MABC-2相比识别疑似发育性协调障碍(DCD)儿童的能力。方法:51名7-14岁的香港儿童参与。每名儿童均采用MABC-2和FMTS进行评估,家长填写修订后的发育协调障碍问卷(DCDQ-R)。使用MABC-2的第15百分位和使用DCDQ-R截止值的FMTS的第5百分位来确定疑似DCD。进行Spearman相关分析。结果:中强相关性(rho = 0.41 -)。70, p = 0.011至p < 0.001),在7-10岁儿童中,FMTS和MABC-2之间存在差异,除了瞄准和捕捉子测试。FMTS鉴定出20名疑似DCD儿童,其中18名得分低于DCDQ-R截止值,而MABC-2鉴定出7名疑似DCD儿童。结论:FMTS显示了收敛效度,并显示了帮助识别与香港儿童精细运动困难相关的DCD的潜力。由于FMTS仅关注精细运动技能,因此建议将其与临床使用的大运动评估相结合。
Relationship Between the Fine Motor Test for the School-Aged and the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition in Chinese Children with Suspected Developmental Coordination Disorder.
Aims: To examine the correlation between a newly developed Fine Motor Test for the School-aged (FMTS) and the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition (MABC-2), and to explore the FMTS's ability to identify children with suspected developmental coordination disorder (DCD) compared to the MABC-2.
Methods: Fifty-one children aged 7-14 years in Hong Kong participated. Each child was assessed with both the MABC-2 and FMTS, and their parents completed the revised Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ-R). Suspected DCD was identified using the 15th percentile for the MABC-2 and the 5th percentile for the FMTS using DCDQ-R cutoffs. Spearman's rho correlation analyses were performed.
Results: Moderate-to-strong correlations (rho = .41-.70, p = .011 to p < .001) between the FMTS and MABC-2, except for the aiming and catching subtest, among children aged 7-10 years. The FMTS identified 20 children with suspected DCD, of whom 18 scored below DCDQ-R cutoffs, while the MABC-2 identified seven children with suspected DCD.
Conclusions: The FMTS demonstrates convergent validity and shows potential for aiding in the identification of DCD specifically related to fine motor difficulties in Hong Kong children. As the FMTS focuses solely on fine motor skills, combining it with gross motor assessments in clinical use is recommended.
期刊介绍:
5 issues per year
Abstracted and/or indexed in: AMED; British Library Inside; Child Development Abstracts; CINAHL; Contents Pages in Education; EBSCO; Education Research Abstracts (ERA); Education Resources Information Center (ERIC); EMCARE; Excerpta Medica/EMBASE; Family and Society Studies Worldwide; Family Index Database; Google Scholar; HaPI Database; HINARI; Index Copernicus; Intute; JournalSeek; MANTIS; MEDLINE; NewJour; OCLC; OTDBASE; OT SEARCH; Otseeker; PEDro; ProQuest; PsycINFO; PSYCLINE; PubsHub; PubMed; REHABDATA; SCOPUS; SIRC; Social Work Abstracts; Speical Educational Needs Abstracts; SwetsWise; Zetoc (British Library); Science Citation Index Expanded (also known as SciSearch®); Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition; Social Sciences Citation Index®; Journal Citation Reports/ Social Sciences Edition; Current Contents®/Social and Behavioral Sciences; Current Contents®/Clinical Medicine