阿奇霉素的大规模给药试验:为未来研究和指南提供信息的分析。

IF 5.5 1区 医学
Alex C Kong, Anthony D So
{"title":"阿奇霉素的大规模给药试验:为未来研究和指南提供信息的分析。","authors":"Alex C Kong, Anthony D So","doi":"10.1186/s40249-025-01322-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2020, the World Health Organization published a guideline on the use of mass drug administration (MDA) of the broad-spectrum antibiotic azithromycin to reduce childhood mortality. As MDA-azithromycin to reduce mortality is considered for expansion to more settings and populations, care must be taken to maximize benefits and reduce risks (e.g., antimicrobial resistance or AMR) of this intervention. Completed and ongoing MDA-azithromycin cluster-randomized clinical trials can provide evidence on the extent to which these benefits and risks accrue and identify practices to monitor these effects and address evidence gaps in future trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined azithromycin clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from registry inception to December 31, 2023. We included trials for which azithromycin was administered for the prevention or treatment of a disease or condition that was not explicitly diagnosed or necessary for participant inclusion, and for which treatment was randomized by geographic units. We identified evidence, knowledge gaps, and trends and highlights across five domains: (1) targeting of MDA-azithromycin, (2) clinical endpoints, (3) co- and competing interventions, (4) spillover effects, and (5) AMR monitoring.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1589 screened studies, 30 met all inclusion criteria. These trials were conducted in 13 countries, predominantly (26/30) in sub-Saharan Africa. Nearly a third (9/30) of the trials included mortality endpoints, but few (2/9) included cause-specific mortality endpoints. New evidence suggests the benefits of widening the target age group and the persistence of mortality benefits in settings with competing interventions. Published practices to ensure geographic separation of communities in different treatment arms to reduce spillover effects were not customary. We found information on AMR monitoring practices for just over half the trials (16/30). Of these, half (8/16) included both phenotypic and genotypic AMR testing, and more than half collected specimens to assess the nasopharyngeal and gut microbiomes (9/16) and tested for non-macrolide resistance (11/16).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Further long-term MDA-azithromycin studies to determine which additional countries could benefit, interventions to accompany or replace this intervention, and the extent to which AMR spillover occurs may prove valuable as guidelines are revised.</p>","PeriodicalId":48820,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases of Poverty","volume":"14 1","pages":"73"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12278655/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mass drug administration trials of azithromycin: an analysis to inform future research and guidelines.\",\"authors\":\"Alex C Kong, Anthony D So\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40249-025-01322-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2020, the World Health Organization published a guideline on the use of mass drug administration (MDA) of the broad-spectrum antibiotic azithromycin to reduce childhood mortality. As MDA-azithromycin to reduce mortality is considered for expansion to more settings and populations, care must be taken to maximize benefits and reduce risks (e.g., antimicrobial resistance or AMR) of this intervention. Completed and ongoing MDA-azithromycin cluster-randomized clinical trials can provide evidence on the extent to which these benefits and risks accrue and identify practices to monitor these effects and address evidence gaps in future trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined azithromycin clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from registry inception to December 31, 2023. We included trials for which azithromycin was administered for the prevention or treatment of a disease or condition that was not explicitly diagnosed or necessary for participant inclusion, and for which treatment was randomized by geographic units. We identified evidence, knowledge gaps, and trends and highlights across five domains: (1) targeting of MDA-azithromycin, (2) clinical endpoints, (3) co- and competing interventions, (4) spillover effects, and (5) AMR monitoring.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1589 screened studies, 30 met all inclusion criteria. These trials were conducted in 13 countries, predominantly (26/30) in sub-Saharan Africa. Nearly a third (9/30) of the trials included mortality endpoints, but few (2/9) included cause-specific mortality endpoints. New evidence suggests the benefits of widening the target age group and the persistence of mortality benefits in settings with competing interventions. Published practices to ensure geographic separation of communities in different treatment arms to reduce spillover effects were not customary. We found information on AMR monitoring practices for just over half the trials (16/30). Of these, half (8/16) included both phenotypic and genotypic AMR testing, and more than half collected specimens to assess the nasopharyngeal and gut microbiomes (9/16) and tested for non-macrolide resistance (11/16).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Further long-term MDA-azithromycin studies to determine which additional countries could benefit, interventions to accompany or replace this intervention, and the extent to which AMR spillover occurs may prove valuable as guidelines are revised.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious Diseases of Poverty\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12278655/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious Diseases of Poverty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-025-01322-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases of Poverty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-025-01322-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2020年,世界卫生组织发布了一份关于使用广谱抗生素阿奇霉素大规模给药(MDA)以降低儿童死亡率的指南。由于考虑将用于降低死亡率的mda -阿奇霉素推广到更多环境和人群,因此必须注意使这种干预措施的效益最大化并降低风险(例如,抗菌素耐药性或AMR)。完成和正在进行的mda -阿奇霉素集群随机临床试验可以提供证据,证明这些益处和风险的累积程度,并确定监测这些效果的做法,并解决未来试验中证据不足的问题。方法:我们分析了从注册开始到2023年12月31日在ClinicalTrials.gov和WHO国际临床试验注册平台注册的阿奇霉素临床试验。我们纳入了阿奇霉素用于预防或治疗非明确诊断或非参与者纳入所必需的疾病或病症的试验,以及按地理单位随机分配治疗的试验。我们确定了五个领域的证据、知识差距、趋势和重点:(1)靶向mda -阿奇霉素,(2)临床终点,(3)协同和竞争干预措施,(4)溢出效应,(5)AMR监测。结果:在1589项筛选研究中,30项符合所有纳入标准。这些试验在13个国家进行,主要(26/30)在撒哈拉以南非洲。近三分之一(9/30)的试验包括死亡率终点,但很少(2/9)的试验包括病因特异性死亡率终点。新的证据表明,在相互竞争的干预措施环境中,扩大目标年龄组和持续降低死亡率的好处。已公布的确保不同治疗领域的社区在地理上分开以减少溢出效应的做法并非惯例。我们在超过一半的试验(16/30)中发现了有关抗菌素耐药性监测实践的信息。其中,一半(8/16)包括表型和基因型AMR检测,一半以上收集标本评估鼻咽和肠道微生物组(9/16)并检测非大环内酯类药物耐药性(11/16)。结论:随着指南的修订,进一步的长期mda -阿奇霉素研究可能会证明是有价值的,以确定哪些国家可以受益,哪些干预措施可以伴随或取代这种干预措施,以及抗生素耐药性溢出发生的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mass drug administration trials of azithromycin: an analysis to inform future research and guidelines.

Mass drug administration trials of azithromycin: an analysis to inform future research and guidelines.

Mass drug administration trials of azithromycin: an analysis to inform future research and guidelines.

Mass drug administration trials of azithromycin: an analysis to inform future research and guidelines.

Background: In 2020, the World Health Organization published a guideline on the use of mass drug administration (MDA) of the broad-spectrum antibiotic azithromycin to reduce childhood mortality. As MDA-azithromycin to reduce mortality is considered for expansion to more settings and populations, care must be taken to maximize benefits and reduce risks (e.g., antimicrobial resistance or AMR) of this intervention. Completed and ongoing MDA-azithromycin cluster-randomized clinical trials can provide evidence on the extent to which these benefits and risks accrue and identify practices to monitor these effects and address evidence gaps in future trials.

Methods: We examined azithromycin clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from registry inception to December 31, 2023. We included trials for which azithromycin was administered for the prevention or treatment of a disease or condition that was not explicitly diagnosed or necessary for participant inclusion, and for which treatment was randomized by geographic units. We identified evidence, knowledge gaps, and trends and highlights across five domains: (1) targeting of MDA-azithromycin, (2) clinical endpoints, (3) co- and competing interventions, (4) spillover effects, and (5) AMR monitoring.

Results: Of 1589 screened studies, 30 met all inclusion criteria. These trials were conducted in 13 countries, predominantly (26/30) in sub-Saharan Africa. Nearly a third (9/30) of the trials included mortality endpoints, but few (2/9) included cause-specific mortality endpoints. New evidence suggests the benefits of widening the target age group and the persistence of mortality benefits in settings with competing interventions. Published practices to ensure geographic separation of communities in different treatment arms to reduce spillover effects were not customary. We found information on AMR monitoring practices for just over half the trials (16/30). Of these, half (8/16) included both phenotypic and genotypic AMR testing, and more than half collected specimens to assess the nasopharyngeal and gut microbiomes (9/16) and tested for non-macrolide resistance (11/16).

Conclusions: Further long-term MDA-azithromycin studies to determine which additional countries could benefit, interventions to accompany or replace this intervention, and the extent to which AMR spillover occurs may prove valuable as guidelines are revised.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
Infectious Diseases of Poverty INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
自引率
1.20%
发文量
368
期刊介绍: Infectious Diseases of Poverty is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that focuses on addressing essential public health questions related to infectious diseases of poverty. The journal covers a wide range of topics including the biology of pathogens and vectors, diagnosis and detection, treatment and case management, epidemiology and modeling, zoonotic hosts and animal reservoirs, control strategies and implementation, new technologies and application. It also considers the transdisciplinary or multisectoral effects on health systems, ecohealth, environmental management, and innovative technology. The journal aims to identify and assess research and information gaps that hinder progress towards new interventions for public health problems in the developing world. Additionally, it provides a platform for discussing these issues to advance research and evidence building for improved public health interventions in poor settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信