Johan Rendy, Isabelle Milleville-Pennel, Cédric Dumas, Thierry Lebourque
{"title":"使用虚拟现实耳机的沉浸式飞行模拟器与针对新手飞行员的专业模拟器的比较和验证。","authors":"Johan Rendy, Isabelle Milleville-Pennel, Cédric Dumas, Thierry Lebourque","doi":"10.1080/00140139.2025.2525956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to assess whether a low-cost flight simulator, using a virtual reality (VR) headset and specially adapted to the needs of novice pilots, could meet training expectations. This simulator was compared with a traditional professional flight simulator equipped with a CAVE projection room. The participants underwent flight training in one or other of the simulators and their performance was compared. Subjective evaluations showed high level of presence despite some dimensions about the feeling of presence sometimes indicates a difference in disfavour of the Headset simulator. Similar mental workload among participants was also observed as well as nearly comparable learning levels (flight performances) between the two systems. Our study demonstrated that a Headset simulator can provide an immersive and educational experience comparable to that of a Cockpit simulator. Thus, Headset simulator represent a viable and economically advantageous alternative to traditional Cockpit simulators for initial pilot training.</p>","PeriodicalId":50503,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison and validation of an immersive flight simulator using a virtual reality headset versus a professional simulator for novice pilots.\",\"authors\":\"Johan Rendy, Isabelle Milleville-Pennel, Cédric Dumas, Thierry Lebourque\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00140139.2025.2525956\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to assess whether a low-cost flight simulator, using a virtual reality (VR) headset and specially adapted to the needs of novice pilots, could meet training expectations. This simulator was compared with a traditional professional flight simulator equipped with a CAVE projection room. The participants underwent flight training in one or other of the simulators and their performance was compared. Subjective evaluations showed high level of presence despite some dimensions about the feeling of presence sometimes indicates a difference in disfavour of the Headset simulator. Similar mental workload among participants was also observed as well as nearly comparable learning levels (flight performances) between the two systems. Our study demonstrated that a Headset simulator can provide an immersive and educational experience comparable to that of a Cockpit simulator. Thus, Headset simulator represent a viable and economically advantageous alternative to traditional Cockpit simulators for initial pilot training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2525956\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2525956","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison and validation of an immersive flight simulator using a virtual reality headset versus a professional simulator for novice pilots.
The aim of this study was to assess whether a low-cost flight simulator, using a virtual reality (VR) headset and specially adapted to the needs of novice pilots, could meet training expectations. This simulator was compared with a traditional professional flight simulator equipped with a CAVE projection room. The participants underwent flight training in one or other of the simulators and their performance was compared. Subjective evaluations showed high level of presence despite some dimensions about the feeling of presence sometimes indicates a difference in disfavour of the Headset simulator. Similar mental workload among participants was also observed as well as nearly comparable learning levels (flight performances) between the two systems. Our study demonstrated that a Headset simulator can provide an immersive and educational experience comparable to that of a Cockpit simulator. Thus, Headset simulator represent a viable and economically advantageous alternative to traditional Cockpit simulators for initial pilot training.
期刊介绍:
Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives.
The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people.
All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.