创伤难民治疗中的稳定干预措施:范围审查。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Global Mental Health Pub Date : 2025-06-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/gmh.2025.10028
Irja Rzepka-Marot, Nadja Gebhardt, Jonathan Nowak, Bastian Bruns, Hans-Christoph Friederich, Christoph Nikendei
{"title":"创伤难民治疗中的稳定干预措施:范围审查。","authors":"Irja Rzepka-Marot, Nadja Gebhardt, Jonathan Nowak, Bastian Bruns, Hans-Christoph Friederich, Christoph Nikendei","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2025.10028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Refugees and forced migrants are particularly susceptible to trauma-related disorders, due exposure to traumatic events before, during or after displacement. In trauma therapy, the concept of psychological stabilization refers to the improvement of a patient's capacity to manage symptoms and emotions associated with traumatic experiences. While exposure-based therapies are widely recommended for treating posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), stabilizing interventions may offer a valuable alternative, particularly given the unique challenges in refugee care. This scoping review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of stabilizing, non exposure-based interventions for traumatized refugees A systematic search identified 31 relevant studies featuring diverse interventions, settings, and outcomes. Most studies showed a significant reduction in PTSD symptoms compared to waitlist (six studies), treatment as usual (three studies) and pre-post analyses (nine studies), though nine studies found no difference between intervention and comparison group. Notably, two studies found the stabilizing approach less effective than the comparison group, and two reported no symptom reduction in pre-post analysis. Heterogenity among the examined interventions as well as living conditions was high and limited the generizability of the results. Further studies should take these environmental factors into consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":48579,"journal":{"name":"Global Mental Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"e73"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277214/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stabilization interventions in the treatment of traumatized refugees: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Irja Rzepka-Marot, Nadja Gebhardt, Jonathan Nowak, Bastian Bruns, Hans-Christoph Friederich, Christoph Nikendei\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/gmh.2025.10028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Refugees and forced migrants are particularly susceptible to trauma-related disorders, due exposure to traumatic events before, during or after displacement. In trauma therapy, the concept of psychological stabilization refers to the improvement of a patient's capacity to manage symptoms and emotions associated with traumatic experiences. While exposure-based therapies are widely recommended for treating posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), stabilizing interventions may offer a valuable alternative, particularly given the unique challenges in refugee care. This scoping review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of stabilizing, non exposure-based interventions for traumatized refugees A systematic search identified 31 relevant studies featuring diverse interventions, settings, and outcomes. Most studies showed a significant reduction in PTSD symptoms compared to waitlist (six studies), treatment as usual (three studies) and pre-post analyses (nine studies), though nine studies found no difference between intervention and comparison group. Notably, two studies found the stabilizing approach less effective than the comparison group, and two reported no symptom reduction in pre-post analysis. Heterogenity among the examined interventions as well as living conditions was high and limited the generizability of the results. Further studies should take these environmental factors into consideration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"e73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277214/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2025.10028\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2025.10028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于在流离失所之前、期间或之后经历过创伤性事件,难民和被迫移徙者特别容易患上与创伤有关的疾病。在创伤治疗中,心理稳定的概念是指患者管理与创伤经历相关的症状和情绪的能力的改善。虽然暴露疗法被广泛推荐用于治疗创伤后应激障碍(PTSD),但稳定干预措施可能提供一种有价值的替代方案,特别是考虑到难民护理的独特挑战。本综述旨在为创伤难民提供稳定、非暴露干预措施的全面概述。系统搜索确定了31项相关研究,这些研究具有不同的干预措施、环境和结果。大多数研究显示,与等候组(6项研究)、常规治疗组(3项研究)和前后分析组(9项研究)相比,创伤后应激障碍症状显著减轻,尽管有9项研究发现干预组和对照组之间没有差异。值得注意的是,两项研究发现稳定方法的效果不如对照组,两项研究报告在前后分析中没有症状减轻。所检查的干预措施和生活条件之间的异质性很高,限制了结果的普遍性。进一步的研究应考虑到这些环境因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stabilization interventions in the treatment of traumatized refugees: A scoping review.

Refugees and forced migrants are particularly susceptible to trauma-related disorders, due exposure to traumatic events before, during or after displacement. In trauma therapy, the concept of psychological stabilization refers to the improvement of a patient's capacity to manage symptoms and emotions associated with traumatic experiences. While exposure-based therapies are widely recommended for treating posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), stabilizing interventions may offer a valuable alternative, particularly given the unique challenges in refugee care. This scoping review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of stabilizing, non exposure-based interventions for traumatized refugees A systematic search identified 31 relevant studies featuring diverse interventions, settings, and outcomes. Most studies showed a significant reduction in PTSD symptoms compared to waitlist (six studies), treatment as usual (three studies) and pre-post analyses (nine studies), though nine studies found no difference between intervention and comparison group. Notably, two studies found the stabilizing approach less effective than the comparison group, and two reported no symptom reduction in pre-post analysis. Heterogenity among the examined interventions as well as living conditions was high and limited the generizability of the results. Further studies should take these environmental factors into consideration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Mental Health
Global Mental Health PSYCHIATRY-
自引率
5.10%
发文量
58
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: lobal Mental Health (GMH) is an Open Access journal that publishes papers that have a broad application of ‘the global point of view’ of mental health issues. The field of ‘global mental health’ is still emerging, reflecting a movement of advocacy and associated research driven by an agenda to remedy longstanding treatment gaps and disparities in care, access, and capacity. But these efforts and goals are also driving a potential reframing of knowledge in powerful ways, and positioning a new disciplinary approach to mental health. GMH seeks to cultivate and grow this emerging distinct discipline of ‘global mental health’, and the new knowledge and paradigms that should come from it.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信