日本本科医科学生健康公平教育方案的发展与评价:一项前后研究设计。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Medical Education Online Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-21 DOI:10.1080/10872981.2025.2535411
Tamaki Urban, Koki Yokota
{"title":"日本本科医科学生健康公平教育方案的发展与评价:一项前后研究设计。","authors":"Tamaki Urban, Koki Yokota","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2025.2535411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals in Japan experience significant health disparities. While Western curricula devote multiple hours to structured SGM health modules, Japanese medical schools offer only about 1 h, leaving future providers underprepared. This study aims to 1) develop a health equity education program on SGM for medical undergraduates in Japan, 2) assess the program's effects while considering empathy levels and SGM identities, and 3) evaluate participant satisfaction with the program. A 3-h educational program was integrated into a psychology course for undergraduate freshmen within the faculty of medicine. Utilizing a pretest-posttest single-group design, the study evaluated outcomes through validated self-report measures and a satisfaction survey. ANOVA models examined the program effects on the awareness of inequities faced by SGM groups and attitudes towards them, while considering the moderating roles of empathy and SGM identities. Descriptive statistics examined program satisfaction. Among 112 participants (mean age 18.5 years, SD = 0.6), 2.7% identified as SGM, with 15.2% unsure. Awareness of SGM health disparities significantly increased from pre to postintervention (<i>p</i> < .001). Interaction analyses showed that this gain did not vary with empathy level (<i>p</i> = .286) or with SGM identity status (<i>p</i> = .445). Attitudes toward SGM individuals likewise improved (<i>p</i> < .001). Interaction analyses showed that this gain did not vary with empathy level (<i>p</i> = .699) or by identity (<i>p</i> = .414). Overall, 99.1% of participants reported satisfaction with the program, and all recognized its utility. The program appeared beneficial even for students who had not yet developed high levels of empathy or those with diverse identities. Our findings call for a sustained effort to embed such education within medical training programs, ensuring that future healthcare professionals are well-equipped to provide inclusive care to SGM individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"30 1","pages":"2535411"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12281662/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Program development and evaluation of a health equity education for undergraduate medical students in Japan: a pre-post study design.\",\"authors\":\"Tamaki Urban, Koki Yokota\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10872981.2025.2535411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals in Japan experience significant health disparities. While Western curricula devote multiple hours to structured SGM health modules, Japanese medical schools offer only about 1 h, leaving future providers underprepared. This study aims to 1) develop a health equity education program on SGM for medical undergraduates in Japan, 2) assess the program's effects while considering empathy levels and SGM identities, and 3) evaluate participant satisfaction with the program. A 3-h educational program was integrated into a psychology course for undergraduate freshmen within the faculty of medicine. Utilizing a pretest-posttest single-group design, the study evaluated outcomes through validated self-report measures and a satisfaction survey. ANOVA models examined the program effects on the awareness of inequities faced by SGM groups and attitudes towards them, while considering the moderating roles of empathy and SGM identities. Descriptive statistics examined program satisfaction. Among 112 participants (mean age 18.5 years, SD = 0.6), 2.7% identified as SGM, with 15.2% unsure. Awareness of SGM health disparities significantly increased from pre to postintervention (<i>p</i> < .001). Interaction analyses showed that this gain did not vary with empathy level (<i>p</i> = .286) or with SGM identity status (<i>p</i> = .445). Attitudes toward SGM individuals likewise improved (<i>p</i> < .001). Interaction analyses showed that this gain did not vary with empathy level (<i>p</i> = .699) or by identity (<i>p</i> = .414). Overall, 99.1% of participants reported satisfaction with the program, and all recognized its utility. The program appeared beneficial even for students who had not yet developed high levels of empathy or those with diverse identities. Our findings call for a sustained effort to embed such education within medical training programs, ensuring that future healthcare professionals are well-equipped to provide inclusive care to SGM individuals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Education Online\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"2535411\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12281662/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Education Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2025.2535411\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education Online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2025.2535411","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

日本的性和性别少数群体在健康方面存在巨大差异。西方的课程花了很多时间来结构化的SGM健康模块,而日本的医学院只提供大约1小时,这让未来的医生准备不足。本研究的目的在于:1)建立日本医学本科生的健康公平教育计划;2)评估该计划的效果,同时考虑移情水平和SGM身份;3)评估参与者对该计划的满意度。一个3小时的教育项目被整合到医学院本科新生的心理学课程中。本研究采用前测后测单组设计,通过有效的自我报告测量和满意度调查来评估结果。方差分析模型考察了项目对SGM群体所面临的不平等意识和态度的影响,同时考虑了共情和SGM身份的调节作用。描述性统计检验了项目满意度。在112名参与者(平均年龄18.5岁,SD = 0.6)中,2.7%确定为SGM, 15.2%不确定。对SGM健康差异的认识从干预前到干预后显著增加(p p = 0.286)或随着SGM身份状态的增加而显著增加(p = 0.445)。对SGM个体的态度同样改善(p = .699)或因身份而改善(p = .414)。总体而言,99.1%的参与者对该计划表示满意,并且都认识到它的实用性。这个项目似乎对那些尚未发展出高度同理心的学生或具有不同身份的学生也有好处。我们的研究结果呼吁持续努力将此类教育纳入医疗培训计划,确保未来的医疗保健专业人员有能力为SGM个体提供包容性护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Program development and evaluation of a health equity education for undergraduate medical students in Japan: a pre-post study design.

Program development and evaluation of a health equity education for undergraduate medical students in Japan: a pre-post study design.

Program development and evaluation of a health equity education for undergraduate medical students in Japan: a pre-post study design.

Sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals in Japan experience significant health disparities. While Western curricula devote multiple hours to structured SGM health modules, Japanese medical schools offer only about 1 h, leaving future providers underprepared. This study aims to 1) develop a health equity education program on SGM for medical undergraduates in Japan, 2) assess the program's effects while considering empathy levels and SGM identities, and 3) evaluate participant satisfaction with the program. A 3-h educational program was integrated into a psychology course for undergraduate freshmen within the faculty of medicine. Utilizing a pretest-posttest single-group design, the study evaluated outcomes through validated self-report measures and a satisfaction survey. ANOVA models examined the program effects on the awareness of inequities faced by SGM groups and attitudes towards them, while considering the moderating roles of empathy and SGM identities. Descriptive statistics examined program satisfaction. Among 112 participants (mean age 18.5 years, SD = 0.6), 2.7% identified as SGM, with 15.2% unsure. Awareness of SGM health disparities significantly increased from pre to postintervention (p < .001). Interaction analyses showed that this gain did not vary with empathy level (p = .286) or with SGM identity status (p = .445). Attitudes toward SGM individuals likewise improved (p < .001). Interaction analyses showed that this gain did not vary with empathy level (p = .699) or by identity (p = .414). Overall, 99.1% of participants reported satisfaction with the program, and all recognized its utility. The program appeared beneficial even for students who had not yet developed high levels of empathy or those with diverse identities. Our findings call for a sustained effort to embed such education within medical training programs, ensuring that future healthcare professionals are well-equipped to provide inclusive care to SGM individuals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education Online
Medical Education Online EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education Online is an open access journal of health care education, publishing peer-reviewed research, perspectives, reviews, and early documentation of new ideas and trends. Medical Education Online aims to disseminate information on the education and training of physicians and other health care professionals. Manuscripts may address any aspect of health care education and training, including, but not limited to: -Basic science education -Clinical science education -Residency education -Learning theory -Problem-based learning (PBL) -Curriculum development -Research design and statistics -Measurement and evaluation -Faculty development -Informatics/web
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信