基于免疫层析的犬犬瘟热快速检测及其与RT-PCR的比较。

IF 0.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 ZOOLOGY
Veterinary Research Forum Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-15 DOI:10.30466/vrf.2024.2030571.4301
Jharna Koul, Divya Agnihotri, Ricky Jhambh, Tarun Kumar, Gaurav Charaya
{"title":"基于免疫层析的犬犬瘟热快速检测及其与RT-PCR的比较。","authors":"Jharna Koul, Divya Agnihotri, Ricky Jhambh, Tarun Kumar, Gaurav Charaya","doi":"10.30466/vrf.2024.2030571.4301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study was planned to confirm the clinical diagnosis of canine distemper in dogs with reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and its comparison with lateral flow assay based immuno-chromatographic (IC) technique. Fifty clients owned dogs having clinical signs suggestive of respiratory, skin or nervous form of canine distemper were included in the study. An immuno-chromatography-based test was applied using serum to screen each of the suspected dog. In addition to serum, nasal discharges of 15 cases and ocular discharges of 10 samples were used to diagnose canine distemper. Screening with IC kit revealed 72.00% serum samples positive, 66.66% ocular and 50.00% nasal samples were found positive for antigen. The RT-PCR targeting N gene of canine distemper virus was used for the molecular diagnosis of canine distemper. Out of 50 blood samples tested with RT-PCR assay, 38 (76.00%) samples were positive showing characteristics band of 287bp. Statistical comparison of IC Kit (serum samples) results with RT-PCR results comparison showed that IC kit was 52.00% accurate with 36.84% sensitivity, 100% specificity, positive predictive value of 93.33% and negative predictive value of 31.43%. In the current study it was observed that the IC test was rapid, quick and specific but was found to be less sensitive compared to RT-PCR.</p>","PeriodicalId":23989,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Research Forum","volume":"16 5","pages":"261-265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276371/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immuno-chromatography based rapid detection of canine distemper in dogs and its comparison with RT-PCR.\",\"authors\":\"Jharna Koul, Divya Agnihotri, Ricky Jhambh, Tarun Kumar, Gaurav Charaya\",\"doi\":\"10.30466/vrf.2024.2030571.4301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The present study was planned to confirm the clinical diagnosis of canine distemper in dogs with reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and its comparison with lateral flow assay based immuno-chromatographic (IC) technique. Fifty clients owned dogs having clinical signs suggestive of respiratory, skin or nervous form of canine distemper were included in the study. An immuno-chromatography-based test was applied using serum to screen each of the suspected dog. In addition to serum, nasal discharges of 15 cases and ocular discharges of 10 samples were used to diagnose canine distemper. Screening with IC kit revealed 72.00% serum samples positive, 66.66% ocular and 50.00% nasal samples were found positive for antigen. The RT-PCR targeting N gene of canine distemper virus was used for the molecular diagnosis of canine distemper. Out of 50 blood samples tested with RT-PCR assay, 38 (76.00%) samples were positive showing characteristics band of 287bp. Statistical comparison of IC Kit (serum samples) results with RT-PCR results comparison showed that IC kit was 52.00% accurate with 36.84% sensitivity, 100% specificity, positive predictive value of 93.33% and negative predictive value of 31.43%. In the current study it was observed that the IC test was rapid, quick and specific but was found to be less sensitive compared to RT-PCR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary Research Forum\",\"volume\":\"16 5\",\"pages\":\"261-265\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276371/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary Research Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30466/vrf.2024.2030571.4301\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Research Forum","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30466/vrf.2024.2030571.4301","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在验证逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)对犬犬瘟热的临床诊断,并与基于侧流法的免疫层析(IC)技术进行比较。50名客户的狗有呼吸道、皮肤或神经型犬瘟热的临床症状,他们的狗被纳入研究。采用血清免疫层析法对每只疑似犬进行筛查。除血清外,用15例鼻分泌物和10例眼分泌物诊断犬瘟热。血清、眼、鼻抗原阳性率分别为72.00%、66.66%和50.00%。采用靶向犬瘟热病毒N基因的RT-PCR技术对犬瘟热病毒进行分子诊断。RT-PCR检测50份血样,38份(76.00%)阳性,特征带为287bp。将IC Kit(血清样本)结果与RT-PCR结果进行统计比较,IC Kit准确率为52.00%,敏感性36.84%,特异性100%,阳性预测值93.33%,阴性预测值31.43%。在目前的研究中,观察到IC测试快速,快速和特异性,但发现与RT-PCR相比敏感度较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Immuno-chromatography based rapid detection of canine distemper in dogs and its comparison with RT-PCR.

The present study was planned to confirm the clinical diagnosis of canine distemper in dogs with reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and its comparison with lateral flow assay based immuno-chromatographic (IC) technique. Fifty clients owned dogs having clinical signs suggestive of respiratory, skin or nervous form of canine distemper were included in the study. An immuno-chromatography-based test was applied using serum to screen each of the suspected dog. In addition to serum, nasal discharges of 15 cases and ocular discharges of 10 samples were used to diagnose canine distemper. Screening with IC kit revealed 72.00% serum samples positive, 66.66% ocular and 50.00% nasal samples were found positive for antigen. The RT-PCR targeting N gene of canine distemper virus was used for the molecular diagnosis of canine distemper. Out of 50 blood samples tested with RT-PCR assay, 38 (76.00%) samples were positive showing characteristics band of 287bp. Statistical comparison of IC Kit (serum samples) results with RT-PCR results comparison showed that IC kit was 52.00% accurate with 36.84% sensitivity, 100% specificity, positive predictive value of 93.33% and negative predictive value of 31.43%. In the current study it was observed that the IC test was rapid, quick and specific but was found to be less sensitive compared to RT-PCR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary Research Forum
Veterinary Research Forum Veterinary-General Veterinary
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Research Forum (VRF) is a quarterly international journal committed to publish worldwide contributions on all aspects of veterinary science and medicine, including anatomy and histology, physiology and pharmacology, anatomic and clinical pathology, parasitology, microbiology, immunology and epidemiology, food hygiene, poultry science, fish and aquaculture, anesthesia and surgery, large and small animal internal medicine, large and small animal reproduction, biotechnology and diagnostic imaging of domestic, companion and farm animals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信