[慢性鼻窦炎合并鼻息肉患者鼻窦支架植入术时机及近期临床疗效评价]。

Q4 Medicine
H Q Zhou, L Tan, P Q Liu, Y Xu
{"title":"[慢性鼻窦炎合并鼻息肉患者鼻窦支架植入术时机及近期临床疗效评价]。","authors":"H Q Zhou, L Tan, P Q Liu, Y Xu","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20250425-00252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To assess the optimal timing and short-term clinical efficacy of sinus drug-eluting stent placement in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). <b>Methods:</b> The minimum sample size was calculated using G-power 3.1.9.7 software. From March 2021 and May 2023, a total of 114 eligible patients with CRSwNP were recruited in this study at the Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. The patients were randomly assigned to three groups: the control group, the intraoperative stent group, and the postoperative stent group. In the intraoperative stent group, drug-eluting stents were implanted during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), while patients in the postoperative stent group received drug-eluting stent 2 weeks after ESS, following routine debridement of the surgical cavity. Bilateral ethmoid sinus stenting was performed for both stent groups, while the control group only underwent ESS with standard postoperative cavity debridement. All subjects were followed up at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively. Nasal symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and endoscopic evaluations of the ethmoid cavity-assessing obstruction, crusting, polypoid mucosal changes, epithelialization of ethmoid cavity, need for intervention, and complications such as middle turbinate lateralization and adhesions-were collected to evaluate the treatment efficacy of three groups. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 9. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to analyze continuous variables among the three groups, and chi-square tests were used for categorical variables. <b>Results:</b> Among 114 CRSwNP patients, 21 lost follow-up patients and 7 postoperative oral corticosteroid intervention patients were excluded. Finally, 86 patients were included in the analysis, including 45 males and 41 females, aged 18-65 years. The cohort comprised 29 in the control group, 29 in the intraoperative stent group, and 28 in the postoperative stent group. Successful bilateral ethmoid sinus stent implantation was achieved in both stent groups. At 4 weeks postoperatively, compared with the control group, both stent groups showed significant improvements in nasal congestion and rhinorrhea scores (<i>P</i><0.05). At 8 weeks, the postoperative group continued to demonstrate superior outcomes in these two symptoms (both <i>P</i><0.05), while the intraoperative group only showed significant improvement in nasal congestion (<i>P</i><0.05). No significant differences were observed in facial pressure, olfactory loss, or nasal dryness scores among the three groups (all <i>P</i>>0.05). Endoscopic evaluation revealed that both stent groups had significant improvements in ethmoid sinus obstruction scores at 4 weeks compared with the control group, with the postoperative group maintaining this advantage at 8 weeks (<i>P</i><0.05). At 2 weeks, the intraoperative stent group had higher crusting scores than other groups (<i>P</i><0.05). At 2 weeks after stent implantation, the postoperative stent group had significantly lower crusting scores than the intraoperative stent group (<i>P</i><0.001). The intraoperative group had a significantly lower incidence of ethmoid sinus edema and polypoid changes at 4 weeks compared with the control group (<i>P</i><0.05), while the postoperative group showed reduced rates of these pathological changes at 4, 8, and 12 weeks (all <i>P</i><0.05). The postoperative stent group had significantly higher rates of ethmoid sinus mucosal epithelialization at 8 and 12 weeks postoperatively compared with the control group. The intraoperative stent group required fewer interventions than the control group at both 8 and 12 weeks, while the postoperative stent group maintained lower interventions rates at all follow-up points after implantation (all <i>P</i><0.05). Additionally, the incidence of complications was significantly lower in both stent groups compared with the control group (<i>P</i><0.05). Overall, stent implantation at different time points showed similar efficacy, with the postoperative group demonstrating more stable outcomes and less crusting/coagulation formation compared with the intraoperative group. <b>Conclusions:</b> The implantation of corticosteroid sinus stents in the ethmoid sinuses effectively controls postoperative inflammation, promotes mucosal epithelialization, and reduces postoperative intervention rates. Stent implantation two weeks after surgery is feasible. Adjusting the timing of stent placement can minimize crust formation and maximize the corticosteroid effect, thereby facilitating a benign course of the surgical site.</p>","PeriodicalId":23987,"journal":{"name":"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery","volume":"60 6","pages":"638-645"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Evaluation of timing and short-term clinical efficacy of sinus stent implantation in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps].\",\"authors\":\"H Q Zhou, L Tan, P Q Liu, Y Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20250425-00252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To assess the optimal timing and short-term clinical efficacy of sinus drug-eluting stent placement in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). <b>Methods:</b> The minimum sample size was calculated using G-power 3.1.9.7 software. From March 2021 and May 2023, a total of 114 eligible patients with CRSwNP were recruited in this study at the Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. The patients were randomly assigned to three groups: the control group, the intraoperative stent group, and the postoperative stent group. In the intraoperative stent group, drug-eluting stents were implanted during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), while patients in the postoperative stent group received drug-eluting stent 2 weeks after ESS, following routine debridement of the surgical cavity. Bilateral ethmoid sinus stenting was performed for both stent groups, while the control group only underwent ESS with standard postoperative cavity debridement. All subjects were followed up at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively. Nasal symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and endoscopic evaluations of the ethmoid cavity-assessing obstruction, crusting, polypoid mucosal changes, epithelialization of ethmoid cavity, need for intervention, and complications such as middle turbinate lateralization and adhesions-were collected to evaluate the treatment efficacy of three groups. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 9. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to analyze continuous variables among the three groups, and chi-square tests were used for categorical variables. <b>Results:</b> Among 114 CRSwNP patients, 21 lost follow-up patients and 7 postoperative oral corticosteroid intervention patients were excluded. Finally, 86 patients were included in the analysis, including 45 males and 41 females, aged 18-65 years. The cohort comprised 29 in the control group, 29 in the intraoperative stent group, and 28 in the postoperative stent group. Successful bilateral ethmoid sinus stent implantation was achieved in both stent groups. At 4 weeks postoperatively, compared with the control group, both stent groups showed significant improvements in nasal congestion and rhinorrhea scores (<i>P</i><0.05). At 8 weeks, the postoperative group continued to demonstrate superior outcomes in these two symptoms (both <i>P</i><0.05), while the intraoperative group only showed significant improvement in nasal congestion (<i>P</i><0.05). No significant differences were observed in facial pressure, olfactory loss, or nasal dryness scores among the three groups (all <i>P</i>>0.05). Endoscopic evaluation revealed that both stent groups had significant improvements in ethmoid sinus obstruction scores at 4 weeks compared with the control group, with the postoperative group maintaining this advantage at 8 weeks (<i>P</i><0.05). At 2 weeks, the intraoperative stent group had higher crusting scores than other groups (<i>P</i><0.05). At 2 weeks after stent implantation, the postoperative stent group had significantly lower crusting scores than the intraoperative stent group (<i>P</i><0.001). The intraoperative group had a significantly lower incidence of ethmoid sinus edema and polypoid changes at 4 weeks compared with the control group (<i>P</i><0.05), while the postoperative group showed reduced rates of these pathological changes at 4, 8, and 12 weeks (all <i>P</i><0.05). The postoperative stent group had significantly higher rates of ethmoid sinus mucosal epithelialization at 8 and 12 weeks postoperatively compared with the control group. The intraoperative stent group required fewer interventions than the control group at both 8 and 12 weeks, while the postoperative stent group maintained lower interventions rates at all follow-up points after implantation (all <i>P</i><0.05). Additionally, the incidence of complications was significantly lower in both stent groups compared with the control group (<i>P</i><0.05). Overall, stent implantation at different time points showed similar efficacy, with the postoperative group demonstrating more stable outcomes and less crusting/coagulation formation compared with the intraoperative group. <b>Conclusions:</b> The implantation of corticosteroid sinus stents in the ethmoid sinuses effectively controls postoperative inflammation, promotes mucosal epithelialization, and reduces postoperative intervention rates. Stent implantation two weeks after surgery is feasible. Adjusting the timing of stent placement can minimize crust formation and maximize the corticosteroid effect, thereby facilitating a benign course of the surgical site.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery\",\"volume\":\"60 6\",\"pages\":\"638-645\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20250425-00252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20250425-00252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨慢性鼻窦炎合并鼻息肉(CRSwNP)患者鼻窦药物洗脱支架置入术的最佳时机及近期临床疗效。方法:采用G-power 3.1.9.7软件计算最小样本量。本研究于2021年3月至2023年5月在武汉大学人民医院耳鼻喉头颈外科共招募了114例符合条件的CRSwNP患者。患者随机分为三组:对照组、术中支架组和术后支架组。术中支架组在内镜鼻窦手术(ESS)中植入药物洗脱支架,术后支架组在ESS术后2周常规清创术腔后植入药物洗脱支架。两组均行双侧筛窦支架植入术,对照组仅行ESS,术后标准腔清创术。所有受试者于术后2、4、8、12周随访。收集鼻部症状视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分和内镜下筛腔评价,评估鼻窦阻塞、结痂、息肉样粘膜改变、筛腔上皮化、干预需要、中鼻甲偏侧、粘连等并发症,评价三组患者的治疗效果。使用GraphPad Prism 9进行统计分析。三组间连续变量采用方差分析(ANOVA),分类变量采用卡方检验。结果:114例CRSwNP患者中,失访患者21例,术后口服皮质激素干预患者7例。最终纳入86例患者,其中男性45例,女性41例,年龄18-65岁。对照组29例,术中支架组29例,术后支架组28例。两组患者均成功植入双侧筛窦支架。术后4周,与对照组相比,两组患者鼻塞和鼻漏评分均有显著改善(PPPP>0.05)。内镜评估显示,两组支架组在4周时与对照组相比,筛窦阻塞评分均有显著改善,术后组在8周时仍保持这一优势(ppppppppp)结论:在筛窦内植入皮质类固醇窦支架可有效控制术后炎症,促进粘膜上皮化,降低术后干预率。术后两周支架植入是可行的。调整支架置入时间可以最大限度地减少结痂的形成,最大限度地发挥皮质类固醇的作用,从而促进手术部位的良性发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Evaluation of timing and short-term clinical efficacy of sinus stent implantation in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps].

Objective: To assess the optimal timing and short-term clinical efficacy of sinus drug-eluting stent placement in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Methods: The minimum sample size was calculated using G-power 3.1.9.7 software. From March 2021 and May 2023, a total of 114 eligible patients with CRSwNP were recruited in this study at the Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. The patients were randomly assigned to three groups: the control group, the intraoperative stent group, and the postoperative stent group. In the intraoperative stent group, drug-eluting stents were implanted during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), while patients in the postoperative stent group received drug-eluting stent 2 weeks after ESS, following routine debridement of the surgical cavity. Bilateral ethmoid sinus stenting was performed for both stent groups, while the control group only underwent ESS with standard postoperative cavity debridement. All subjects were followed up at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively. Nasal symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and endoscopic evaluations of the ethmoid cavity-assessing obstruction, crusting, polypoid mucosal changes, epithelialization of ethmoid cavity, need for intervention, and complications such as middle turbinate lateralization and adhesions-were collected to evaluate the treatment efficacy of three groups. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 9. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to analyze continuous variables among the three groups, and chi-square tests were used for categorical variables. Results: Among 114 CRSwNP patients, 21 lost follow-up patients and 7 postoperative oral corticosteroid intervention patients were excluded. Finally, 86 patients were included in the analysis, including 45 males and 41 females, aged 18-65 years. The cohort comprised 29 in the control group, 29 in the intraoperative stent group, and 28 in the postoperative stent group. Successful bilateral ethmoid sinus stent implantation was achieved in both stent groups. At 4 weeks postoperatively, compared with the control group, both stent groups showed significant improvements in nasal congestion and rhinorrhea scores (P<0.05). At 8 weeks, the postoperative group continued to demonstrate superior outcomes in these two symptoms (both P<0.05), while the intraoperative group only showed significant improvement in nasal congestion (P<0.05). No significant differences were observed in facial pressure, olfactory loss, or nasal dryness scores among the three groups (all P>0.05). Endoscopic evaluation revealed that both stent groups had significant improvements in ethmoid sinus obstruction scores at 4 weeks compared with the control group, with the postoperative group maintaining this advantage at 8 weeks (P<0.05). At 2 weeks, the intraoperative stent group had higher crusting scores than other groups (P<0.05). At 2 weeks after stent implantation, the postoperative stent group had significantly lower crusting scores than the intraoperative stent group (P<0.001). The intraoperative group had a significantly lower incidence of ethmoid sinus edema and polypoid changes at 4 weeks compared with the control group (P<0.05), while the postoperative group showed reduced rates of these pathological changes at 4, 8, and 12 weeks (all P<0.05). The postoperative stent group had significantly higher rates of ethmoid sinus mucosal epithelialization at 8 and 12 weeks postoperatively compared with the control group. The intraoperative stent group required fewer interventions than the control group at both 8 and 12 weeks, while the postoperative stent group maintained lower interventions rates at all follow-up points after implantation (all P<0.05). Additionally, the incidence of complications was significantly lower in both stent groups compared with the control group (P<0.05). Overall, stent implantation at different time points showed similar efficacy, with the postoperative group demonstrating more stable outcomes and less crusting/coagulation formation compared with the intraoperative group. Conclusions: The implantation of corticosteroid sinus stents in the ethmoid sinuses effectively controls postoperative inflammation, promotes mucosal epithelialization, and reduces postoperative intervention rates. Stent implantation two weeks after surgery is feasible. Adjusting the timing of stent placement can minimize crust formation and maximize the corticosteroid effect, thereby facilitating a benign course of the surgical site.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12432
期刊介绍: Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery is a high-level medical science and technology journal sponsored and published directly by the Chinese Medical Association, reflecting the significant research progress in the field of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery in China, and striving to promote the domestic and international academic exchanges for the purpose of running the journal. Over the years, the journal has been ranked first in the total citation frequency list of national scientific and technical journals published by the Documentation and Intelligence Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the China Science Citation Database, and has always ranked first among the scientific and technical journals in the related fields. Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery has been included in the authoritative databases PubMed, Chinese core journals, CSCD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信