{"title":"[慢性鼻窦炎合并鼻息肉患者鼻窦支架植入术时机及近期临床疗效评价]。","authors":"H Q Zhou, L Tan, P Q Liu, Y Xu","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20250425-00252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To assess the optimal timing and short-term clinical efficacy of sinus drug-eluting stent placement in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). <b>Methods:</b> The minimum sample size was calculated using G-power 3.1.9.7 software. From March 2021 and May 2023, a total of 114 eligible patients with CRSwNP were recruited in this study at the Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. The patients were randomly assigned to three groups: the control group, the intraoperative stent group, and the postoperative stent group. In the intraoperative stent group, drug-eluting stents were implanted during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), while patients in the postoperative stent group received drug-eluting stent 2 weeks after ESS, following routine debridement of the surgical cavity. Bilateral ethmoid sinus stenting was performed for both stent groups, while the control group only underwent ESS with standard postoperative cavity debridement. All subjects were followed up at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively. Nasal symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and endoscopic evaluations of the ethmoid cavity-assessing obstruction, crusting, polypoid mucosal changes, epithelialization of ethmoid cavity, need for intervention, and complications such as middle turbinate lateralization and adhesions-were collected to evaluate the treatment efficacy of three groups. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 9. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to analyze continuous variables among the three groups, and chi-square tests were used for categorical variables. <b>Results:</b> Among 114 CRSwNP patients, 21 lost follow-up patients and 7 postoperative oral corticosteroid intervention patients were excluded. Finally, 86 patients were included in the analysis, including 45 males and 41 females, aged 18-65 years. The cohort comprised 29 in the control group, 29 in the intraoperative stent group, and 28 in the postoperative stent group. Successful bilateral ethmoid sinus stent implantation was achieved in both stent groups. At 4 weeks postoperatively, compared with the control group, both stent groups showed significant improvements in nasal congestion and rhinorrhea scores (<i>P</i><0.05). At 8 weeks, the postoperative group continued to demonstrate superior outcomes in these two symptoms (both <i>P</i><0.05), while the intraoperative group only showed significant improvement in nasal congestion (<i>P</i><0.05). No significant differences were observed in facial pressure, olfactory loss, or nasal dryness scores among the three groups (all <i>P</i>>0.05). Endoscopic evaluation revealed that both stent groups had significant improvements in ethmoid sinus obstruction scores at 4 weeks compared with the control group, with the postoperative group maintaining this advantage at 8 weeks (<i>P</i><0.05). At 2 weeks, the intraoperative stent group had higher crusting scores than other groups (<i>P</i><0.05). At 2 weeks after stent implantation, the postoperative stent group had significantly lower crusting scores than the intraoperative stent group (<i>P</i><0.001). The intraoperative group had a significantly lower incidence of ethmoid sinus edema and polypoid changes at 4 weeks compared with the control group (<i>P</i><0.05), while the postoperative group showed reduced rates of these pathological changes at 4, 8, and 12 weeks (all <i>P</i><0.05). The postoperative stent group had significantly higher rates of ethmoid sinus mucosal epithelialization at 8 and 12 weeks postoperatively compared with the control group. The intraoperative stent group required fewer interventions than the control group at both 8 and 12 weeks, while the postoperative stent group maintained lower interventions rates at all follow-up points after implantation (all <i>P</i><0.05). Additionally, the incidence of complications was significantly lower in both stent groups compared with the control group (<i>P</i><0.05). Overall, stent implantation at different time points showed similar efficacy, with the postoperative group demonstrating more stable outcomes and less crusting/coagulation formation compared with the intraoperative group. <b>Conclusions:</b> The implantation of corticosteroid sinus stents in the ethmoid sinuses effectively controls postoperative inflammation, promotes mucosal epithelialization, and reduces postoperative intervention rates. Stent implantation two weeks after surgery is feasible. Adjusting the timing of stent placement can minimize crust formation and maximize the corticosteroid effect, thereby facilitating a benign course of the surgical site.</p>","PeriodicalId":23987,"journal":{"name":"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery","volume":"60 6","pages":"638-645"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Evaluation of timing and short-term clinical efficacy of sinus stent implantation in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps].\",\"authors\":\"H Q Zhou, L Tan, P Q Liu, Y Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20250425-00252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To assess the optimal timing and short-term clinical efficacy of sinus drug-eluting stent placement in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). <b>Methods:</b> The minimum sample size was calculated using G-power 3.1.9.7 software. From March 2021 and May 2023, a total of 114 eligible patients with CRSwNP were recruited in this study at the Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. The patients were randomly assigned to three groups: the control group, the intraoperative stent group, and the postoperative stent group. In the intraoperative stent group, drug-eluting stents were implanted during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), while patients in the postoperative stent group received drug-eluting stent 2 weeks after ESS, following routine debridement of the surgical cavity. Bilateral ethmoid sinus stenting was performed for both stent groups, while the control group only underwent ESS with standard postoperative cavity debridement. All subjects were followed up at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively. Nasal symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and endoscopic evaluations of the ethmoid cavity-assessing obstruction, crusting, polypoid mucosal changes, epithelialization of ethmoid cavity, need for intervention, and complications such as middle turbinate lateralization and adhesions-were collected to evaluate the treatment efficacy of three groups. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 9. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to analyze continuous variables among the three groups, and chi-square tests were used for categorical variables. <b>Results:</b> Among 114 CRSwNP patients, 21 lost follow-up patients and 7 postoperative oral corticosteroid intervention patients were excluded. Finally, 86 patients were included in the analysis, including 45 males and 41 females, aged 18-65 years. The cohort comprised 29 in the control group, 29 in the intraoperative stent group, and 28 in the postoperative stent group. Successful bilateral ethmoid sinus stent implantation was achieved in both stent groups. At 4 weeks postoperatively, compared with the control group, both stent groups showed significant improvements in nasal congestion and rhinorrhea scores (<i>P</i><0.05). At 8 weeks, the postoperative group continued to demonstrate superior outcomes in these two symptoms (both <i>P</i><0.05), while the intraoperative group only showed significant improvement in nasal congestion (<i>P</i><0.05). No significant differences were observed in facial pressure, olfactory loss, or nasal dryness scores among the three groups (all <i>P</i>>0.05). Endoscopic evaluation revealed that both stent groups had significant improvements in ethmoid sinus obstruction scores at 4 weeks compared with the control group, with the postoperative group maintaining this advantage at 8 weeks (<i>P</i><0.05). At 2 weeks, the intraoperative stent group had higher crusting scores than other groups (<i>P</i><0.05). At 2 weeks after stent implantation, the postoperative stent group had significantly lower crusting scores than the intraoperative stent group (<i>P</i><0.001). The intraoperative group had a significantly lower incidence of ethmoid sinus edema and polypoid changes at 4 weeks compared with the control group (<i>P</i><0.05), while the postoperative group showed reduced rates of these pathological changes at 4, 8, and 12 weeks (all <i>P</i><0.05). The postoperative stent group had significantly higher rates of ethmoid sinus mucosal epithelialization at 8 and 12 weeks postoperatively compared with the control group. The intraoperative stent group required fewer interventions than the control group at both 8 and 12 weeks, while the postoperative stent group maintained lower interventions rates at all follow-up points after implantation (all <i>P</i><0.05). Additionally, the incidence of complications was significantly lower in both stent groups compared with the control group (<i>P</i><0.05). Overall, stent implantation at different time points showed similar efficacy, with the postoperative group demonstrating more stable outcomes and less crusting/coagulation formation compared with the intraoperative group. <b>Conclusions:</b> The implantation of corticosteroid sinus stents in the ethmoid sinuses effectively controls postoperative inflammation, promotes mucosal epithelialization, and reduces postoperative intervention rates. Stent implantation two weeks after surgery is feasible. Adjusting the timing of stent placement can minimize crust formation and maximize the corticosteroid effect, thereby facilitating a benign course of the surgical site.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery\",\"volume\":\"60 6\",\"pages\":\"638-645\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20250425-00252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20250425-00252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Evaluation of timing and short-term clinical efficacy of sinus stent implantation in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps].
Objective: To assess the optimal timing and short-term clinical efficacy of sinus drug-eluting stent placement in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Methods: The minimum sample size was calculated using G-power 3.1.9.7 software. From March 2021 and May 2023, a total of 114 eligible patients with CRSwNP were recruited in this study at the Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. The patients were randomly assigned to three groups: the control group, the intraoperative stent group, and the postoperative stent group. In the intraoperative stent group, drug-eluting stents were implanted during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), while patients in the postoperative stent group received drug-eluting stent 2 weeks after ESS, following routine debridement of the surgical cavity. Bilateral ethmoid sinus stenting was performed for both stent groups, while the control group only underwent ESS with standard postoperative cavity debridement. All subjects were followed up at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively. Nasal symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and endoscopic evaluations of the ethmoid cavity-assessing obstruction, crusting, polypoid mucosal changes, epithelialization of ethmoid cavity, need for intervention, and complications such as middle turbinate lateralization and adhesions-were collected to evaluate the treatment efficacy of three groups. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 9. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to analyze continuous variables among the three groups, and chi-square tests were used for categorical variables. Results: Among 114 CRSwNP patients, 21 lost follow-up patients and 7 postoperative oral corticosteroid intervention patients were excluded. Finally, 86 patients were included in the analysis, including 45 males and 41 females, aged 18-65 years. The cohort comprised 29 in the control group, 29 in the intraoperative stent group, and 28 in the postoperative stent group. Successful bilateral ethmoid sinus stent implantation was achieved in both stent groups. At 4 weeks postoperatively, compared with the control group, both stent groups showed significant improvements in nasal congestion and rhinorrhea scores (P<0.05). At 8 weeks, the postoperative group continued to demonstrate superior outcomes in these two symptoms (both P<0.05), while the intraoperative group only showed significant improvement in nasal congestion (P<0.05). No significant differences were observed in facial pressure, olfactory loss, or nasal dryness scores among the three groups (all P>0.05). Endoscopic evaluation revealed that both stent groups had significant improvements in ethmoid sinus obstruction scores at 4 weeks compared with the control group, with the postoperative group maintaining this advantage at 8 weeks (P<0.05). At 2 weeks, the intraoperative stent group had higher crusting scores than other groups (P<0.05). At 2 weeks after stent implantation, the postoperative stent group had significantly lower crusting scores than the intraoperative stent group (P<0.001). The intraoperative group had a significantly lower incidence of ethmoid sinus edema and polypoid changes at 4 weeks compared with the control group (P<0.05), while the postoperative group showed reduced rates of these pathological changes at 4, 8, and 12 weeks (all P<0.05). The postoperative stent group had significantly higher rates of ethmoid sinus mucosal epithelialization at 8 and 12 weeks postoperatively compared with the control group. The intraoperative stent group required fewer interventions than the control group at both 8 and 12 weeks, while the postoperative stent group maintained lower interventions rates at all follow-up points after implantation (all P<0.05). Additionally, the incidence of complications was significantly lower in both stent groups compared with the control group (P<0.05). Overall, stent implantation at different time points showed similar efficacy, with the postoperative group demonstrating more stable outcomes and less crusting/coagulation formation compared with the intraoperative group. Conclusions: The implantation of corticosteroid sinus stents in the ethmoid sinuses effectively controls postoperative inflammation, promotes mucosal epithelialization, and reduces postoperative intervention rates. Stent implantation two weeks after surgery is feasible. Adjusting the timing of stent placement can minimize crust formation and maximize the corticosteroid effect, thereby facilitating a benign course of the surgical site.
期刊介绍:
Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery is a high-level medical science and technology journal sponsored and published directly by the Chinese Medical Association, reflecting the significant research progress in the field of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery in China, and striving to promote the domestic and international academic exchanges for the purpose of running the journal.
Over the years, the journal has been ranked first in the total citation frequency list of national scientific and technical journals published by the Documentation and Intelligence Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the China Science Citation Database, and has always ranked first among the scientific and technical journals in the related fields.
Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery has been included in the authoritative databases PubMed, Chinese core journals, CSCD.