通过对门诊护理敏感的条件评估卫生系统。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sofia Castro Vargas, Sebastian Bauhoff
{"title":"通过对门诊护理敏感的条件评估卫生系统。","authors":"Sofia Castro Vargas, Sebastian Bauhoff","doi":"10.26633/RPSP.2025.75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ambulatory care-sensitive conditions are those for which effective primary health care services could prevent hospitalizations or mitigate severe complications. Hospital admissions for these conditions have been used to measure the effectiveness of primary health care. We review and compare lists of these conditions developed by national and international health entities to explore their applicability to diverse health care systems, the conditions included and the methodological challenges of making cross-country comparisons. While ambulatory care-sensitive conditions can provide a framework for assessing the performance of health care systems, the relevance of specific conditions or lists depends on the local epidemiological context. Countries have developed lists to address their specific context and priorities, for example, with Brazil focusing on infectious diseases and the United Kingdom emphasizing chronic conditions. We explore case studies of how analyses of these conditions can inform policy aimed at improving the effectiveness and accessibility of primary health care, provide evidence about the prevalence and sociodemographic heterogeneity of these conditions, and how they can be used for cross-country comparisons. The findings underscore the importance of developing context-specific lists of ambulatory care-sensitive conditions when evaluating the performance of primary health care services, promoting informed policy decisions and guiding resource allocation in health care systems. Standardized data collection and coding practices are required to enable meaningful cross-country comparisons and to ensure the effective use of these conditions as a tool to assess and monitor health system performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":21264,"journal":{"name":"Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica-pan American Journal of Public Health","volume":"49 ","pages":"e75"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12275720/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating health systems through ambulatory care-sensitive conditions.\",\"authors\":\"Sofia Castro Vargas, Sebastian Bauhoff\",\"doi\":\"10.26633/RPSP.2025.75\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ambulatory care-sensitive conditions are those for which effective primary health care services could prevent hospitalizations or mitigate severe complications. Hospital admissions for these conditions have been used to measure the effectiveness of primary health care. We review and compare lists of these conditions developed by national and international health entities to explore their applicability to diverse health care systems, the conditions included and the methodological challenges of making cross-country comparisons. While ambulatory care-sensitive conditions can provide a framework for assessing the performance of health care systems, the relevance of specific conditions or lists depends on the local epidemiological context. Countries have developed lists to address their specific context and priorities, for example, with Brazil focusing on infectious diseases and the United Kingdom emphasizing chronic conditions. We explore case studies of how analyses of these conditions can inform policy aimed at improving the effectiveness and accessibility of primary health care, provide evidence about the prevalence and sociodemographic heterogeneity of these conditions, and how they can be used for cross-country comparisons. The findings underscore the importance of developing context-specific lists of ambulatory care-sensitive conditions when evaluating the performance of primary health care services, promoting informed policy decisions and guiding resource allocation in health care systems. Standardized data collection and coding practices are required to enable meaningful cross-country comparisons and to ensure the effective use of these conditions as a tool to assess and monitor health system performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica-pan American Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":\"49 \",\"pages\":\"e75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12275720/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica-pan American Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2025.75\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica-pan American Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2025.75","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对门诊护理敏感的病症是指那些有效的初级卫生保健服务可以预防住院或减轻严重并发症的病症。这些疾病的住院情况已被用来衡量初级卫生保健的有效性。我们回顾并比较了国家和国际卫生实体制定的这些条件清单,以探索它们对不同卫生保健系统的适用性、所包括的条件以及进行跨国比较的方法挑战。虽然对门诊护理敏感的疾病可以为评估卫生保健系统的绩效提供一个框架,但具体疾病或清单的相关性取决于当地的流行病学背景。各国针对其具体情况和优先事项制定了清单,例如,巴西侧重于传染病,联合王国侧重于慢性病。我们探讨了案例研究,以了解这些疾病的分析如何为旨在提高初级卫生保健的有效性和可及性的政策提供信息,提供有关这些疾病的患病率和社会人口异质性的证据,以及如何将它们用于跨国比较。研究结果强调了在评估初级卫生保健服务绩效、促进知情决策和指导卫生保健系统资源分配时,制定针对具体情况的门诊护理敏感病症清单的重要性。需要标准化的数据收集和编码做法,以便进行有意义的跨国比较,并确保有效利用这些条件作为评估和监测卫生系统绩效的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating health systems through ambulatory care-sensitive conditions.

Ambulatory care-sensitive conditions are those for which effective primary health care services could prevent hospitalizations or mitigate severe complications. Hospital admissions for these conditions have been used to measure the effectiveness of primary health care. We review and compare lists of these conditions developed by national and international health entities to explore their applicability to diverse health care systems, the conditions included and the methodological challenges of making cross-country comparisons. While ambulatory care-sensitive conditions can provide a framework for assessing the performance of health care systems, the relevance of specific conditions or lists depends on the local epidemiological context. Countries have developed lists to address their specific context and priorities, for example, with Brazil focusing on infectious diseases and the United Kingdom emphasizing chronic conditions. We explore case studies of how analyses of these conditions can inform policy aimed at improving the effectiveness and accessibility of primary health care, provide evidence about the prevalence and sociodemographic heterogeneity of these conditions, and how they can be used for cross-country comparisons. The findings underscore the importance of developing context-specific lists of ambulatory care-sensitive conditions when evaluating the performance of primary health care services, promoting informed policy decisions and guiding resource allocation in health care systems. Standardized data collection and coding practices are required to enable meaningful cross-country comparisons and to ensure the effective use of these conditions as a tool to assess and monitor health system performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
222
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信