宫颈癌筛查的吸收及其决定因素在非洲:总括审查。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-07-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0328103
Berihun Agegn Mengistie, Mihret Melese, Ashebir Mamay Gebiru, Mihret Getnet, Amare Belete Getahun, Worku Chekol Tassew, Mikias Mered Tilahun, Yosef Belay Bizuneh, Habtu Kifle Negash, Nebebe Demis Baykemagn, Desale B Asmamaw, Amlaku Nigusie Yirsaw, Alemken Eyayu Abuhay, Desalegn Anmut Bitew
{"title":"宫颈癌筛查的吸收及其决定因素在非洲:总括审查。","authors":"Berihun Agegn Mengistie, Mihret Melese, Ashebir Mamay Gebiru, Mihret Getnet, Amare Belete Getahun, Worku Chekol Tassew, Mikias Mered Tilahun, Yosef Belay Bizuneh, Habtu Kifle Negash, Nebebe Demis Baykemagn, Desale B Asmamaw, Amlaku Nigusie Yirsaw, Alemken Eyayu Abuhay, Desalegn Anmut Bitew","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0328103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical cancer is the fourth most prevalent type of cancer in women globally. Early detection and treatment of precancerous cervical lesions and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection are strongly advised to decrease the incidence of cervical cancer and death. Cervical cancer is a major public health concern in low- and middle-income nations, where screening and treatment options are constrained. Thus, the main objective of this umbrella review was to determine the pooled uptake of cervical cancer screening and its determinants in Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The protocol for this umbrella review was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with reference number CRD42024518297. We conduct a systematic and comprehensive search by using Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, Hinari, and Science Direct, from January 1, 2014, to September 20, 2024. The data were extracted using Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. The methodological quality of the included studies was examined using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2). The statistical analysis was carried out using STATA version 17, which includes descriptive analysis, forest plots for prevalence, funnel plot, and an Egger test to examine publication bias. A random-effects model was used to determine the pooled effect estimate. Publication bias was checked by using the funnel plot and Egger's tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This umbrella review included 11 systematic reviews and meta-analysis studies across Africa with a total of 143,327 study participants. The overall prevalence of cervical cancer screening practice in Africa was 20.94% (95% CI: 15.84%-26.04%). Women's level of knowledge (AOR: 3.22, 95% CI: 1.64-6.33), positive attitude toward CCS (AOR: 2.48, 95% CI: 2.18-2.81), perceived vulnerability to cervical cancer (AOR = 3.57, 95% CI: 2.75, 4.63), and history of STIs (AOR = 4.89, 95% CI: 3.14, 7.62) were significantly associated with cervical cancer screening practice. In conclusion, the combined estimate of cervical cancer screening use in Africa remains much lower (20.94%) than the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations target (70%). It indicates that there is a large gap that requires being addressed in collaboration to reduce the burden of cervical cancer and its morbidity and mortality across the continent. Therefore, healthcare professionals, policymakers, and other stakeholders shall implement effective strategies such as empowering women, improving the knowledge and attitude towards cervical cancer screening, advocacy, and expanding screening programs to all eligible women to increase utilization of cervical cancer screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 7","pages":"e0328103"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12279115/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uptake of cervical cancer screening and its determinants in Africa: Umbrella review.\",\"authors\":\"Berihun Agegn Mengistie, Mihret Melese, Ashebir Mamay Gebiru, Mihret Getnet, Amare Belete Getahun, Worku Chekol Tassew, Mikias Mered Tilahun, Yosef Belay Bizuneh, Habtu Kifle Negash, Nebebe Demis Baykemagn, Desale B Asmamaw, Amlaku Nigusie Yirsaw, Alemken Eyayu Abuhay, Desalegn Anmut Bitew\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0328103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical cancer is the fourth most prevalent type of cancer in women globally. Early detection and treatment of precancerous cervical lesions and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection are strongly advised to decrease the incidence of cervical cancer and death. Cervical cancer is a major public health concern in low- and middle-income nations, where screening and treatment options are constrained. Thus, the main objective of this umbrella review was to determine the pooled uptake of cervical cancer screening and its determinants in Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The protocol for this umbrella review was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with reference number CRD42024518297. We conduct a systematic and comprehensive search by using Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, Hinari, and Science Direct, from January 1, 2014, to September 20, 2024. The data were extracted using Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. The methodological quality of the included studies was examined using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2). The statistical analysis was carried out using STATA version 17, which includes descriptive analysis, forest plots for prevalence, funnel plot, and an Egger test to examine publication bias. A random-effects model was used to determine the pooled effect estimate. Publication bias was checked by using the funnel plot and Egger's tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This umbrella review included 11 systematic reviews and meta-analysis studies across Africa with a total of 143,327 study participants. The overall prevalence of cervical cancer screening practice in Africa was 20.94% (95% CI: 15.84%-26.04%). Women's level of knowledge (AOR: 3.22, 95% CI: 1.64-6.33), positive attitude toward CCS (AOR: 2.48, 95% CI: 2.18-2.81), perceived vulnerability to cervical cancer (AOR = 3.57, 95% CI: 2.75, 4.63), and history of STIs (AOR = 4.89, 95% CI: 3.14, 7.62) were significantly associated with cervical cancer screening practice. In conclusion, the combined estimate of cervical cancer screening use in Africa remains much lower (20.94%) than the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations target (70%). It indicates that there is a large gap that requires being addressed in collaboration to reduce the burden of cervical cancer and its morbidity and mortality across the continent. Therefore, healthcare professionals, policymakers, and other stakeholders shall implement effective strategies such as empowering women, improving the knowledge and attitude towards cervical cancer screening, advocacy, and expanding screening programs to all eligible women to increase utilization of cervical cancer screening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 7\",\"pages\":\"e0328103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12279115/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328103\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328103","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:宫颈癌是全球第四大流行的女性癌症类型。我们强烈建议及早发现和治疗宫颈癌前病变和人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)感染,以减少宫颈癌的发病率和死亡率。宫颈癌是低收入和中等收入国家的一个主要公共卫生问题,在这些国家,筛查和治疗选择有限。因此,本综述的主要目的是确定非洲宫颈癌筛查的总体吸收情况及其决定因素。方法:本研究遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。该总结性综述的方案已在国际前瞻性系统综述登记册(PROSPERO)上注册,参考编号为CRD42024518297。从2014年1月1日至2024年9月20日,我们通过谷歌Scholar、PubMed、Scopus、Hinari和Science Direct进行了系统而全面的检索。使用Microsoft Excel电子表格提取数据。采用评估系统评价的测量工具2 (AMSTAR 2)检查纳入研究的方法学质量。使用STATA版本17进行统计分析,其中包括描述性分析、患病率的森林图、漏斗图和检验发表偏倚的Egger检验。随机效应模型用于确定合并效应估计。采用漏斗图和Egger检验检验发表偏倚。结果:该综述包括11项系统综述和荟萃分析研究,涉及非洲的143327名研究参与者。非洲宫颈癌筛查的总体流行率为20.94% (95% CI: 15.84%-26.04%)。妇女的知识水平(AOR: 3.22, 95% CI: 1.64-6.33)、对CCS的积极态度(AOR: 2.48, 95% CI: 2.18-2.81)、对宫颈癌的易感性(AOR = 3.57, 95% CI: 2.75, 4.63)和性传播感染史(AOR = 4.89, 95% CI: 3.14, 7.62)与宫颈癌筛查实践显著相关。总之,非洲宫颈癌筛查使用的综合估计(20.94%)仍然远低于世界卫生组织(世卫组织)建议的目标(70%)。报告指出,需要通过合作解决一个巨大的差距,以减轻整个非洲大陆的子宫颈癌负担及其发病率和死亡率。因此,医疗保健专业人员、政策制定者和其他利益相关者应实施有效的战略,如赋予妇女权力,改善对宫颈癌筛查的知识和态度,宣传和扩大筛查方案到所有符合条件的妇女,以提高宫颈癌筛查的利用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Uptake of cervical cancer screening and its determinants in Africa: Umbrella review.

Uptake of cervical cancer screening and its determinants in Africa: Umbrella review.

Uptake of cervical cancer screening and its determinants in Africa: Umbrella review.

Uptake of cervical cancer screening and its determinants in Africa: Umbrella review.

Background: Cervical cancer is the fourth most prevalent type of cancer in women globally. Early detection and treatment of precancerous cervical lesions and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection are strongly advised to decrease the incidence of cervical cancer and death. Cervical cancer is a major public health concern in low- and middle-income nations, where screening and treatment options are constrained. Thus, the main objective of this umbrella review was to determine the pooled uptake of cervical cancer screening and its determinants in Africa.

Methods: This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The protocol for this umbrella review was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with reference number CRD42024518297. We conduct a systematic and comprehensive search by using Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, Hinari, and Science Direct, from January 1, 2014, to September 20, 2024. The data were extracted using Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. The methodological quality of the included studies was examined using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2). The statistical analysis was carried out using STATA version 17, which includes descriptive analysis, forest plots for prevalence, funnel plot, and an Egger test to examine publication bias. A random-effects model was used to determine the pooled effect estimate. Publication bias was checked by using the funnel plot and Egger's tests.

Results: This umbrella review included 11 systematic reviews and meta-analysis studies across Africa with a total of 143,327 study participants. The overall prevalence of cervical cancer screening practice in Africa was 20.94% (95% CI: 15.84%-26.04%). Women's level of knowledge (AOR: 3.22, 95% CI: 1.64-6.33), positive attitude toward CCS (AOR: 2.48, 95% CI: 2.18-2.81), perceived vulnerability to cervical cancer (AOR = 3.57, 95% CI: 2.75, 4.63), and history of STIs (AOR = 4.89, 95% CI: 3.14, 7.62) were significantly associated with cervical cancer screening practice. In conclusion, the combined estimate of cervical cancer screening use in Africa remains much lower (20.94%) than the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations target (70%). It indicates that there is a large gap that requires being addressed in collaboration to reduce the burden of cervical cancer and its morbidity and mortality across the continent. Therefore, healthcare professionals, policymakers, and other stakeholders shall implement effective strategies such as empowering women, improving the knowledge and attitude towards cervical cancer screening, advocacy, and expanding screening programs to all eligible women to increase utilization of cervical cancer screening.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信