抗菌光动力疗法对乳牙牙髓学细菌减少的疗效:一项体外研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Maria Luiza Costabeber Perin, Maysa Lannes Duarte, Kenderson Santos Silva, Gloria Fernanda Castro, Antônio Ferreira-Pereira, Maristela Barbosa Portela, Laura Guimarães Primo
{"title":"抗菌光动力疗法对乳牙牙髓学细菌减少的疗效:一项体外研究。","authors":"Maria Luiza Costabeber Perin, Maysa Lannes Duarte, Kenderson Santos Silva, Gloria Fernanda Castro, Antônio Ferreira-Pereira, Maristela Barbosa Portela, Laura Guimarães Primo","doi":"10.1007/s10103-025-04570-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Different adjunct methods have been proposed to reduce microorganisms during endodontic treatment. This study aimed to evaluate microbial reduction in vitro in the root canals of extracted primary teeth contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC), following antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT). Twenty-one root canals of primary teeth, decals from the repository of a research group were contaminated and divided into three groups (7 roots per group): the control group (CG) underwent chemical-mechanical preparation (CMP) with mechanized instrumentation and smear layer removal; intervention group 1 (G1) underwent aPDT without CMP; and intervention group 2 (G2) underwent CMP followed by aPDT. Significant bacterial reductions were observed across all the groups (p = 0.001), with final mean bacterial loads statistically lower than the initial mean levels (p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney test). The G2 group demonstrated the highest mean microbial reduction, with 5 roots achieving complete bacterial elimination (100% reduction). Comparatively, the mean colony-forming unit (CFU) reduction values in G2 were comparable to those in CG (p = 0.318), and both were significantly higher than in G1 (p = 0.001 for CG vs. G1; p = 0.001 for G2 vs. G1). Under the conditions tested, aPDT served as an effective adjunct technique to pulpectomy, but did not outperform conventional pulpectomy performed alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":"40 1","pages":"322"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy for bacterial reduction in endodontics of primary teeth: an in vitro study.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Luiza Costabeber Perin, Maysa Lannes Duarte, Kenderson Santos Silva, Gloria Fernanda Castro, Antônio Ferreira-Pereira, Maristela Barbosa Portela, Laura Guimarães Primo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10103-025-04570-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Different adjunct methods have been proposed to reduce microorganisms during endodontic treatment. This study aimed to evaluate microbial reduction in vitro in the root canals of extracted primary teeth contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC), following antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT). Twenty-one root canals of primary teeth, decals from the repository of a research group were contaminated and divided into three groups (7 roots per group): the control group (CG) underwent chemical-mechanical preparation (CMP) with mechanized instrumentation and smear layer removal; intervention group 1 (G1) underwent aPDT without CMP; and intervention group 2 (G2) underwent CMP followed by aPDT. Significant bacterial reductions were observed across all the groups (p = 0.001), with final mean bacterial loads statistically lower than the initial mean levels (p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney test). The G2 group demonstrated the highest mean microbial reduction, with 5 roots achieving complete bacterial elimination (100% reduction). Comparatively, the mean colony-forming unit (CFU) reduction values in G2 were comparable to those in CG (p = 0.318), and both were significantly higher than in G1 (p = 0.001 for CG vs. G1; p = 0.001 for G2 vs. G1). Under the conditions tested, aPDT served as an effective adjunct technique to pulpectomy, but did not outperform conventional pulpectomy performed alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lasers in Medical Science\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"322\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lasers in Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04570-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04570-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

已经提出了不同的辅助方法来减少根管治疗过程中的微生物。本研究旨在评估受粪肠球菌(Enterococcus faecalis, ATCC)污染的拔牙根管中微生物数量在抗菌光动力治疗(aPDT)后的体外减少情况。将研究组21颗乳牙根管中的贴片污染后分成3组(每组7根):对照组(CG)采用机械器械化学-机械制备(CMP),去除涂片层;干预组1 (G1)行aPDT,无CMP;干预组2 (G2)行CMP + aPDT。在所有组中都观察到显著的细菌减少(p = 0.001),最终平均细菌负荷在统计学上低于初始平均水平(p = 0.001)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy for bacterial reduction in endodontics of primary teeth: an in vitro study.

Different adjunct methods have been proposed to reduce microorganisms during endodontic treatment. This study aimed to evaluate microbial reduction in vitro in the root canals of extracted primary teeth contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC), following antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT). Twenty-one root canals of primary teeth, decals from the repository of a research group were contaminated and divided into three groups (7 roots per group): the control group (CG) underwent chemical-mechanical preparation (CMP) with mechanized instrumentation and smear layer removal; intervention group 1 (G1) underwent aPDT without CMP; and intervention group 2 (G2) underwent CMP followed by aPDT. Significant bacterial reductions were observed across all the groups (p = 0.001), with final mean bacterial loads statistically lower than the initial mean levels (p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney test). The G2 group demonstrated the highest mean microbial reduction, with 5 roots achieving complete bacterial elimination (100% reduction). Comparatively, the mean colony-forming unit (CFU) reduction values in G2 were comparable to those in CG (p = 0.318), and both were significantly higher than in G1 (p = 0.001 for CG vs. G1; p = 0.001 for G2 vs. G1). Under the conditions tested, aPDT served as an effective adjunct technique to pulpectomy, but did not outperform conventional pulpectomy performed alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lasers in Medical Science
Lasers in Medical Science 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics. The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信