Manjeet Kumar Goyal, Elliot Berinstein, Priyata Dutta, Vineet Ahuja, Peter D R Higgins, Jeffrey Berinstein, Shrinivas Bishu
{"title":"胃肠道PCR在炎症性肠病发作中的作用:双刃剑还是诊断上的突破?","authors":"Manjeet Kumar Goyal, Elliot Berinstein, Priyata Dutta, Vineet Ahuja, Peter D R Higgins, Jeffrey Berinstein, Shrinivas Bishu","doi":"10.1007/s12664-025-01811-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is characterized by chronic gastrointestinal inflammation, leading to unpredictable flares and substantial morbidity. Gastrointestinal polymerase chain reaction (GI-PCR) testing has emerged as a widely used diagnostic tool to identify enteric pathogens during IBD exacerbations. It is a novel, quick and sensitive diagnostic test to detect Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), as well as other enteric pathogens. However, the clinical significance of non-C. difficile pathogens detected by GI-PCR remains uncertain, raising concerns about the over-interpretation of positive results and the potential for unnecessary antimicrobial therapy. While traditional stool culture and microscopy offered limited sensitivity, GI-PCR has dramatically improved pathogen detection rates, identifying infections in up to 26% of IBD patients compared to 5% with conventional methods. Beyond C. difficile, pathogens such as Escherichia coli (especially adherent-invasive strains), Campylobacter, Salmonella, Norovirus and Yersinia enterocolitica are frequently detected in IBD flares. However, whether these microbes actively drive disease exacerbations or merely reflect inflammation-associated dysbiosis remains unclear. Enterobacteriaceae, in particular, bloom in inflamed intestines, raising critical questions regarding their pathogenic role vs. colonization. The high sensitivity of GI-PCR further complicates clinical decision-making, as distinguishing active infection from harmless microbial presence is challenging. This review explores the current literature on GI-PCR in IBD, emphasizing its benefits and limitations. While GI-PCR provides rapid, comprehensive pathogen detection, its indiscriminate application may lead to unnecessary antibiotic use and therapeutic missteps. Understanding the ecological shifts in IBD-associated dysbiosis and refining clinical interpretation of GI-PCR results are essential to optimizing patient management. Future research should aim to delineate the pathogenic significance of non-C. difficile microbes and establish evidence-based protocols for the appropriate use of GI-PCR in IBD care.</p>","PeriodicalId":13404,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of gastrointestinal PCR in inflammatory bowel disease flares: A double-edged sword or a diagnostic breakthrough?\",\"authors\":\"Manjeet Kumar Goyal, Elliot Berinstein, Priyata Dutta, Vineet Ahuja, Peter D R Higgins, Jeffrey Berinstein, Shrinivas Bishu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12664-025-01811-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is characterized by chronic gastrointestinal inflammation, leading to unpredictable flares and substantial morbidity. Gastrointestinal polymerase chain reaction (GI-PCR) testing has emerged as a widely used diagnostic tool to identify enteric pathogens during IBD exacerbations. It is a novel, quick and sensitive diagnostic test to detect Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), as well as other enteric pathogens. However, the clinical significance of non-C. difficile pathogens detected by GI-PCR remains uncertain, raising concerns about the over-interpretation of positive results and the potential for unnecessary antimicrobial therapy. While traditional stool culture and microscopy offered limited sensitivity, GI-PCR has dramatically improved pathogen detection rates, identifying infections in up to 26% of IBD patients compared to 5% with conventional methods. Beyond C. difficile, pathogens such as Escherichia coli (especially adherent-invasive strains), Campylobacter, Salmonella, Norovirus and Yersinia enterocolitica are frequently detected in IBD flares. However, whether these microbes actively drive disease exacerbations or merely reflect inflammation-associated dysbiosis remains unclear. Enterobacteriaceae, in particular, bloom in inflamed intestines, raising critical questions regarding their pathogenic role vs. colonization. The high sensitivity of GI-PCR further complicates clinical decision-making, as distinguishing active infection from harmless microbial presence is challenging. This review explores the current literature on GI-PCR in IBD, emphasizing its benefits and limitations. While GI-PCR provides rapid, comprehensive pathogen detection, its indiscriminate application may lead to unnecessary antibiotic use and therapeutic missteps. Understanding the ecological shifts in IBD-associated dysbiosis and refining clinical interpretation of GI-PCR results are essential to optimizing patient management. Future research should aim to delineate the pathogenic significance of non-C. difficile microbes and establish evidence-based protocols for the appropriate use of GI-PCR in IBD care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-025-01811-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-025-01811-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The role of gastrointestinal PCR in inflammatory bowel disease flares: A double-edged sword or a diagnostic breakthrough?
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is characterized by chronic gastrointestinal inflammation, leading to unpredictable flares and substantial morbidity. Gastrointestinal polymerase chain reaction (GI-PCR) testing has emerged as a widely used diagnostic tool to identify enteric pathogens during IBD exacerbations. It is a novel, quick and sensitive diagnostic test to detect Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), as well as other enteric pathogens. However, the clinical significance of non-C. difficile pathogens detected by GI-PCR remains uncertain, raising concerns about the over-interpretation of positive results and the potential for unnecessary antimicrobial therapy. While traditional stool culture and microscopy offered limited sensitivity, GI-PCR has dramatically improved pathogen detection rates, identifying infections in up to 26% of IBD patients compared to 5% with conventional methods. Beyond C. difficile, pathogens such as Escherichia coli (especially adherent-invasive strains), Campylobacter, Salmonella, Norovirus and Yersinia enterocolitica are frequently detected in IBD flares. However, whether these microbes actively drive disease exacerbations or merely reflect inflammation-associated dysbiosis remains unclear. Enterobacteriaceae, in particular, bloom in inflamed intestines, raising critical questions regarding their pathogenic role vs. colonization. The high sensitivity of GI-PCR further complicates clinical decision-making, as distinguishing active infection from harmless microbial presence is challenging. This review explores the current literature on GI-PCR in IBD, emphasizing its benefits and limitations. While GI-PCR provides rapid, comprehensive pathogen detection, its indiscriminate application may lead to unnecessary antibiotic use and therapeutic missteps. Understanding the ecological shifts in IBD-associated dysbiosis and refining clinical interpretation of GI-PCR results are essential to optimizing patient management. Future research should aim to delineate the pathogenic significance of non-C. difficile microbes and establish evidence-based protocols for the appropriate use of GI-PCR in IBD care.
期刊介绍:
The Indian Journal of Gastroenterology aims to help doctors everywhere practise better medicine and to influence the debate on gastroenterology. To achieve these aims, we publish original scientific studies, state-of -the-art special articles, reports and papers commenting on the clinical, scientific and public health factors affecting aspects of gastroenterology. We shall be delighted to receive articles for publication in all of these categories and letters commenting on the contents of the Journal or on issues of interest to our readers.