不一致的密螺旋体测试结果:通过机器学习技术在18年电子医疗记录和国家索赔数据中识别相关风险因素。

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Hsin-Yao Wang, Ru-Fang Hu, Ting-Wei Lin, Wan-Ying Lin, Yu-Chiang Wang, Jang-Jih Lu, Yi-Ju Tseng
{"title":"不一致的密螺旋体测试结果:通过机器学习技术在18年电子医疗记录和国家索赔数据中识别相关风险因素。","authors":"Hsin-Yao Wang, Ru-Fang Hu, Ting-Wei Lin, Wan-Ying Lin, Yu-Chiang Wang, Jang-Jih Lu, Yi-Ju Tseng","doi":"10.1016/j.bj.2025.100890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Syphilis is a prevalent disease diagnosed primarily through serological tests. Although one confirmatory treponemal tests (TT), including Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) or fluorescent treponema antibody absorption (FTA-Abs), is required for syphilis diagnosis, multiple TTs are commonly administered throughout the disease course. Discrepant TT results can cause confusion and delay treatment. In this study, we identified the clinical characteristics of patients with discrepant TT results and developed a machine learning tool to evaluate the risk of TT discrepancies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, electronic health records were linked to national claims records collected from 2001 to 2018. Variables of interest in risk factor identification and machine learning model development included medical histories and demographic characteristics. The association between syphilis treatment and discrepant TT results was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 5,780 eligible patients tested for syphilis, 133 (2.30%) had discrepant TT results. HIV and AIDS were identified as prominent risk factors associated with discrepant TT results (adjusted odds ratio = 2.6, 95% confidence interval = 1.4-4.7). Patients with a top 5% risk probability in the LightGBM model were 10 times more likely than others to have discrepant TT results. TPPA was more likely than FTA-Abs to become negative after treatment among patients with discrepant TT results (odds ratio = 9.18, 95% confidence interval = 2.05-41.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Risk factor identification and machine learning model development can support the interpretation of serological tests for syphilis, enabling accurate diagnosis and clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":8934,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Journal","volume":" ","pages":"100890"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discrepant Treponemal Test Results: Identification of Associated Risk Factors Through Machine Learning Technology in 18-Year Electronic Medical Records and National Claims Data.\",\"authors\":\"Hsin-Yao Wang, Ru-Fang Hu, Ting-Wei Lin, Wan-Ying Lin, Yu-Chiang Wang, Jang-Jih Lu, Yi-Ju Tseng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bj.2025.100890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Syphilis is a prevalent disease diagnosed primarily through serological tests. Although one confirmatory treponemal tests (TT), including Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) or fluorescent treponema antibody absorption (FTA-Abs), is required for syphilis diagnosis, multiple TTs are commonly administered throughout the disease course. Discrepant TT results can cause confusion and delay treatment. In this study, we identified the clinical characteristics of patients with discrepant TT results and developed a machine learning tool to evaluate the risk of TT discrepancies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, electronic health records were linked to national claims records collected from 2001 to 2018. Variables of interest in risk factor identification and machine learning model development included medical histories and demographic characteristics. The association between syphilis treatment and discrepant TT results was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 5,780 eligible patients tested for syphilis, 133 (2.30%) had discrepant TT results. HIV and AIDS were identified as prominent risk factors associated with discrepant TT results (adjusted odds ratio = 2.6, 95% confidence interval = 1.4-4.7). Patients with a top 5% risk probability in the LightGBM model were 10 times more likely than others to have discrepant TT results. TPPA was more likely than FTA-Abs to become negative after treatment among patients with discrepant TT results (odds ratio = 9.18, 95% confidence interval = 2.05-41.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Risk factor identification and machine learning model development can support the interpretation of serological tests for syphilis, enabling accurate diagnosis and clinical decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100890\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2025.100890\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2025.100890","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:梅毒是一种主要通过血清学检查诊断的流行疾病。虽然梅毒诊断需要进行一次确认性梅毒螺旋体试验(TT),包括梅毒螺旋体颗粒凝集(TPPA)或荧光螺旋体抗体吸收(FTA-Abs),但在整个病程中通常需要进行多次梅毒螺旋体试验。不同的TT结果可能导致混乱和延误治疗。在这项研究中,我们确定了TT结果不一致的患者的临床特征,并开发了一种机器学习工具来评估TT差异的风险。材料和方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,电子健康记录与2001年至2018年收集的国家索赔记录相关联。风险因素识别和机器学习模型开发中感兴趣的变量包括病史和人口统计学特征。评估了梅毒治疗与不同TT结果之间的关系。结果:在5780例符合条件的梅毒检测患者中,133例(2.30%)TT结果不一致。HIV和AIDS被确定为与TT结果差异相关的重要危险因素(校正优势比= 2.6,95%可信区间= 1.4-4.7)。在LightGBM模型中,风险概率最高为5%的患者出现TT结果差异的可能性是其他患者的10倍。在TT结果不一致的患者中,TPPA比FTA-Abs更容易在治疗后变为阴性(优势比= 9.18,95%可信区间= 2.05-41.07)。结论:危险因素识别和机器学习模型开发可以支持梅毒血清学检测的解释,从而实现准确的诊断和临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discrepant Treponemal Test Results: Identification of Associated Risk Factors Through Machine Learning Technology in 18-Year Electronic Medical Records and National Claims Data.

Background: Syphilis is a prevalent disease diagnosed primarily through serological tests. Although one confirmatory treponemal tests (TT), including Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) or fluorescent treponema antibody absorption (FTA-Abs), is required for syphilis diagnosis, multiple TTs are commonly administered throughout the disease course. Discrepant TT results can cause confusion and delay treatment. In this study, we identified the clinical characteristics of patients with discrepant TT results and developed a machine learning tool to evaluate the risk of TT discrepancies.

Materials and methods: In this retrospective cohort study, electronic health records were linked to national claims records collected from 2001 to 2018. Variables of interest in risk factor identification and machine learning model development included medical histories and demographic characteristics. The association between syphilis treatment and discrepant TT results was assessed.

Results: Among 5,780 eligible patients tested for syphilis, 133 (2.30%) had discrepant TT results. HIV and AIDS were identified as prominent risk factors associated with discrepant TT results (adjusted odds ratio = 2.6, 95% confidence interval = 1.4-4.7). Patients with a top 5% risk probability in the LightGBM model were 10 times more likely than others to have discrepant TT results. TPPA was more likely than FTA-Abs to become negative after treatment among patients with discrepant TT results (odds ratio = 9.18, 95% confidence interval = 2.05-41.07).

Conclusions: Risk factor identification and machine learning model development can support the interpretation of serological tests for syphilis, enabling accurate diagnosis and clinical decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Journal
Biomedical Journal Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
128
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Biomedical Journal publishes 6 peer-reviewed issues per year in all fields of clinical and biomedical sciences for an internationally diverse authorship. Unlike most open access journals, which are free to readers but not authors, Biomedical Journal does not charge for subscription, submission, processing or publication of manuscripts, nor for color reproduction of photographs. Clinical studies, accounts of clinical trials, biomarker studies, and characterization of human pathogens are within the scope of the journal, as well as basic studies in model species such as Escherichia coli, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, and Mus musculus revealing the function of molecules, cells, and tissues relevant for human health. However, articles on other species can be published if they contribute to our understanding of basic mechanisms of biology. A highly-cited international editorial board assures timely publication of manuscripts. Reviews on recent progress in biomedical sciences are commissioned by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信