超临界致密相CO2管道动态裂纹扩展与裂纹止裂模型研究进展

IF 4.8 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Yifei Wang , Qihui Hu , Buze Yin , Xuefeng Zhao , Lan Meng , Jianlu Zhu , Xin Ouyang , Yuxing Li
{"title":"超临界致密相CO2管道动态裂纹扩展与裂纹止裂模型研究进展","authors":"Yifei Wang ,&nbsp;Qihui Hu ,&nbsp;Buze Yin ,&nbsp;Xuefeng Zhao ,&nbsp;Lan Meng ,&nbsp;Jianlu Zhu ,&nbsp;Xin Ouyang ,&nbsp;Yuxing Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jpse.2025.100255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the past decade, research on the propagation and arrest of CO<sub>2</sub> pipeline fractures has achieved some results. This paper comprehensively reviews and evaluates the full-scale burst test, arrest control theory model, and numerical simulation, and systematically analyzes the remaining problems. Among them, the brittle-ductile transition process during the fracture process of the pipeline is still unclear, and the relationship between the crack tip pressure and the saturation pressure is still debatable. Both of these points need to be further studied through experiments. Furthermore, the scarcity of existing experimental data has limited the applicability of current arrest models. The prediction of low toughness or saturation pressure is overly conservative, and the experimental-based arrest theory model requires further refinement and optimization. In terms of numerical models, finite element simulation’s accuracy in predicting the fracture process requires improvement, while the fluid-solid coupling model improves calculation accuracy. However, due to the limitations of existing commercial software for calculating the FSI problem, there is a need to develop a commercial FSI strategy for CO<sub>2</sub> pipeline crack propagation. In addition, the majority of existing models describe fluid behavior using homogeneous flow models, and there have been few studies on decompression models that account for delayed phase changes, limiting the model’s prediction accuracy. The three-dimensional pipe-fluid-soil coupling is the most complete model for calculating fracture processes, and it should be the primary focus and challenge of numerical simulation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100824,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering","volume":"5 3","pages":"Article 100255"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research progress on dynamic crack propagation and crack arrest models of supercritical and dense-phase CO2 pipelines\",\"authors\":\"Yifei Wang ,&nbsp;Qihui Hu ,&nbsp;Buze Yin ,&nbsp;Xuefeng Zhao ,&nbsp;Lan Meng ,&nbsp;Jianlu Zhu ,&nbsp;Xin Ouyang ,&nbsp;Yuxing Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpse.2025.100255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the past decade, research on the propagation and arrest of CO<sub>2</sub> pipeline fractures has achieved some results. This paper comprehensively reviews and evaluates the full-scale burst test, arrest control theory model, and numerical simulation, and systematically analyzes the remaining problems. Among them, the brittle-ductile transition process during the fracture process of the pipeline is still unclear, and the relationship between the crack tip pressure and the saturation pressure is still debatable. Both of these points need to be further studied through experiments. Furthermore, the scarcity of existing experimental data has limited the applicability of current arrest models. The prediction of low toughness or saturation pressure is overly conservative, and the experimental-based arrest theory model requires further refinement and optimization. In terms of numerical models, finite element simulation’s accuracy in predicting the fracture process requires improvement, while the fluid-solid coupling model improves calculation accuracy. However, due to the limitations of existing commercial software for calculating the FSI problem, there is a need to develop a commercial FSI strategy for CO<sub>2</sub> pipeline crack propagation. In addition, the majority of existing models describe fluid behavior using homogeneous flow models, and there have been few studies on decompression models that account for delayed phase changes, limiting the model’s prediction accuracy. The three-dimensional pipe-fluid-soil coupling is the most complete model for calculating fracture processes, and it should be the primary focus and challenge of numerical simulation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667143325000022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667143325000022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近十年来,对CO2管道裂缝扩展与止裂的研究取得了一定的成果。本文对全尺寸爆破试验、拦阻控制理论模型和数值模拟进行了全面的回顾和评价,并系统地分析了存在的问题。其中,管道断裂过程中的脆性-韧性转变过程尚不清楚,裂纹尖端压力与饱和压力之间的关系尚存争议。这两点都需要通过实验进一步研究。此外,现有实验数据的稀缺性限制了现有阻滞模型的适用性。低韧性或饱和压力预测过于保守,基于实验的阻滞理论模型需要进一步细化和优化。在数值模型方面,有限元模拟预测断裂过程的精度有待提高,流固耦合模型提高了计算精度。然而,由于现有的商业软件计算FSI问题的局限性,有必要开发一个商业的CO2管道裂纹扩展的FSI策略。此外,现有模型大多采用均匀流动模型来描述流体行为,考虑延迟相变的减压模型研究较少,限制了模型的预测精度。管-流-土三维耦合是计算断裂过程最完整的模型,应成为数值模拟的重点和难点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research progress on dynamic crack propagation and crack arrest models of supercritical and dense-phase CO2 pipelines
In the past decade, research on the propagation and arrest of CO2 pipeline fractures has achieved some results. This paper comprehensively reviews and evaluates the full-scale burst test, arrest control theory model, and numerical simulation, and systematically analyzes the remaining problems. Among them, the brittle-ductile transition process during the fracture process of the pipeline is still unclear, and the relationship between the crack tip pressure and the saturation pressure is still debatable. Both of these points need to be further studied through experiments. Furthermore, the scarcity of existing experimental data has limited the applicability of current arrest models. The prediction of low toughness or saturation pressure is overly conservative, and the experimental-based arrest theory model requires further refinement and optimization. In terms of numerical models, finite element simulation’s accuracy in predicting the fracture process requires improvement, while the fluid-solid coupling model improves calculation accuracy. However, due to the limitations of existing commercial software for calculating the FSI problem, there is a need to develop a commercial FSI strategy for CO2 pipeline crack propagation. In addition, the majority of existing models describe fluid behavior using homogeneous flow models, and there have been few studies on decompression models that account for delayed phase changes, limiting the model’s prediction accuracy. The three-dimensional pipe-fluid-soil coupling is the most complete model for calculating fracture processes, and it should be the primary focus and challenge of numerical simulation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信