Mohamed Elhadi MB BCh, BAO, Mohamad S. Alabdaljabar MBBS, Conor Lane MB BCh, BAO, Abhishek J. Deshmukh MBBS, Rajiv Gulati MD, PhD, Yong-Mei Cha MD, Mackram F. Eleid MD
{"title":"TAVR术后初始心电图未改变患者高级别房室传导阻滞的发生率和预测因素","authors":"Mohamed Elhadi MB BCh, BAO, Mohamad S. Alabdaljabar MBBS, Conor Lane MB BCh, BAO, Abhishek J. Deshmukh MBBS, Rajiv Gulati MD, PhD, Yong-Mei Cha MD, Mackram F. Eleid MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jscai.2025.103666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>High-grade atrioventricular block (HAVB) is common after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We compared patients with baseline conduction disease that is unchanged on the immediate post-TAVR echocardiogram (ECG) to patients with normal baseline and post-TAVR ECG (control group).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Consecutive patients who underwent TAVR at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota) between February 2012 and December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 1069 patients were included in the study: 825 controls, 44 with isolated PR of >240 milliseconds, 93 with left bundle branch block (LBBB), and 107 with right bundle branch block (RBBB). Early HAVB (<24 hours post-TAVR) occurred more frequently in the RBBB group compared with controls (11.2% vs 0.6%; <em>P</em> < .001). Early HAVB incidence was similar between the control, isolated PR >240, and LBBB groups (0.6%, 0%, and 1.1%, respectively). Delayed HAVB (>24 hours post-TAVR) was most frequent in the RBBB group (6.5% vs 1.5%; <em>P</em> < .001), with higher incidence also observed in PR >240 and LBBB groups compared with that in control (4.5% vs 1.5%; <em>P</em> = .14; and 4.3% vs 1.5%; <em>P</em> = .06, respectivley). Most of HAVB events in the control, isolated PR >240 and LBBB groups were delayed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite no immediate change in post-TAVR ECG, 17.8% of patients with preexisting RBBB developed HAVB, mostly within 24 hours. This emphasizes the need for inpatient monitoring for at least 24 hours in this group. Conversely, in patients with isolated PR >240 milliseconds and LBBB, the incidence of HAVB was relatively low (5%), with the majority occurring after 24 hours. Potentially, same-day discharge with ambulatory ECG monitoring may be suitable for these patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73990,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","volume":"4 7","pages":"Article 103666"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence and Predictors of High-Grade AV Block in Patients With Initially Unchanged Electrocardiogram After TAVR\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Elhadi MB BCh, BAO, Mohamad S. Alabdaljabar MBBS, Conor Lane MB BCh, BAO, Abhishek J. Deshmukh MBBS, Rajiv Gulati MD, PhD, Yong-Mei Cha MD, Mackram F. Eleid MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jscai.2025.103666\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>High-grade atrioventricular block (HAVB) is common after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We compared patients with baseline conduction disease that is unchanged on the immediate post-TAVR echocardiogram (ECG) to patients with normal baseline and post-TAVR ECG (control group).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Consecutive patients who underwent TAVR at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota) between February 2012 and December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 1069 patients were included in the study: 825 controls, 44 with isolated PR of >240 milliseconds, 93 with left bundle branch block (LBBB), and 107 with right bundle branch block (RBBB). Early HAVB (<24 hours post-TAVR) occurred more frequently in the RBBB group compared with controls (11.2% vs 0.6%; <em>P</em> < .001). Early HAVB incidence was similar between the control, isolated PR >240, and LBBB groups (0.6%, 0%, and 1.1%, respectively). Delayed HAVB (>24 hours post-TAVR) was most frequent in the RBBB group (6.5% vs 1.5%; <em>P</em> < .001), with higher incidence also observed in PR >240 and LBBB groups compared with that in control (4.5% vs 1.5%; <em>P</em> = .14; and 4.3% vs 1.5%; <em>P</em> = .06, respectivley). Most of HAVB events in the control, isolated PR >240 and LBBB groups were delayed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite no immediate change in post-TAVR ECG, 17.8% of patients with preexisting RBBB developed HAVB, mostly within 24 hours. This emphasizes the need for inpatient monitoring for at least 24 hours in this group. Conversely, in patients with isolated PR >240 milliseconds and LBBB, the incidence of HAVB was relatively low (5%), with the majority occurring after 24 hours. Potentially, same-day discharge with ambulatory ECG monitoring may be suitable for these patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions\",\"volume\":\"4 7\",\"pages\":\"Article 103666\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772930325011081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772930325011081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:高级别房室传导阻滞(HAVB)在经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后很常见。我们比较了tavr后立即超声心动图(ECG)未改变的基线传导疾病患者与基线和tavr后心电图正常的患者(对照组)。方法回顾性分析2012年2月至2021年12月在Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota)连续接受TAVR的患者。结果共纳入1069例患者,其中对照组825例,孤立性PR = 240毫秒44例,左束支阻滞93例,右束支阻滞107例。与对照组相比,RBBB组早期HAVB (tavr后24小时)发生的频率更高(11.2% vs 0.6%;P & lt;措施)。对照组、孤立PR >;240组和LBBB组的早期HAVB发病率相似(分别为0.6%、0%和1.1%)。延迟HAVB (tavr后24小时)在RBBB组最常见(6.5% vs 1.5%;P & lt;.001), PR >;240和LBBB组的发病率也高于对照组(4.5% vs 1.5%;P = .14;4.3% vs 1.5%;P = .06)。对照组、孤立PR >;240组和LBBB组的大部分HAVB事件延迟发生。结论:尽管tavr后心电图没有立即改变,但17.8%的既往RBBB患者发生HAVB,主要发生在24小时内。这就强调了该组患者至少需要24小时的住院监护。相反,在孤立性PR >;240毫秒和LBBB的患者中,HAVB的发生率相对较低(5%),大多数发生在24小时后。可能,当天出院并进行动态心电图监测可能适合这些患者。
Incidence and Predictors of High-Grade AV Block in Patients With Initially Unchanged Electrocardiogram After TAVR
Background
High-grade atrioventricular block (HAVB) is common after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We compared patients with baseline conduction disease that is unchanged on the immediate post-TAVR echocardiogram (ECG) to patients with normal baseline and post-TAVR ECG (control group).
Methods
Consecutive patients who underwent TAVR at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota) between February 2012 and December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed.
Results
In total, 1069 patients were included in the study: 825 controls, 44 with isolated PR of >240 milliseconds, 93 with left bundle branch block (LBBB), and 107 with right bundle branch block (RBBB). Early HAVB (<24 hours post-TAVR) occurred more frequently in the RBBB group compared with controls (11.2% vs 0.6%; P < .001). Early HAVB incidence was similar between the control, isolated PR >240, and LBBB groups (0.6%, 0%, and 1.1%, respectively). Delayed HAVB (>24 hours post-TAVR) was most frequent in the RBBB group (6.5% vs 1.5%; P < .001), with higher incidence also observed in PR >240 and LBBB groups compared with that in control (4.5% vs 1.5%; P = .14; and 4.3% vs 1.5%; P = .06, respectivley). Most of HAVB events in the control, isolated PR >240 and LBBB groups were delayed.
Conclusions
Despite no immediate change in post-TAVR ECG, 17.8% of patients with preexisting RBBB developed HAVB, mostly within 24 hours. This emphasizes the need for inpatient monitoring for at least 24 hours in this group. Conversely, in patients with isolated PR >240 milliseconds and LBBB, the incidence of HAVB was relatively low (5%), with the majority occurring after 24 hours. Potentially, same-day discharge with ambulatory ECG monitoring may be suitable for these patients.