支线运输到地铁的有效分配距离有多远?以西安为例的实证研究

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Liu Yang , Tieyue Zhang , Yuanqing Wang , Yujun Lian , Yang Wang , Yuanyuan Liu , Heng Zhao , Yutong Yuan , Dinghui Zhou
{"title":"支线运输到地铁的有效分配距离有多远?以西安为例的实证研究","authors":"Liu Yang ,&nbsp;Tieyue Zhang ,&nbsp;Yuanqing Wang ,&nbsp;Yujun Lian ,&nbsp;Yang Wang ,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Liu ,&nbsp;Heng Zhao ,&nbsp;Yutong Yuan ,&nbsp;Dinghui Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.07.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Metro construction has encouraged transport emission reductions in the recent decade. Analyzing access/egress distance to station is crucial for transport planning and implementation. In the recent contexts of fast metro construction and advancing information and networking technologies, various feeder transport emerged and access/egress distances to metro extended a lot, but few studies modeled metro mode share variation by access/egress distance. To determine the focus metro catchment area for effective feeder transport allocation, this study explores the threshold range of access/egress distance by walking, biking, bus and park-and-ride. The data comes from a sampling survey of household travel in Xi'an. The results show that, within a 3-km radius of the stations, metro mode shares decrease quickly from 16-23 % to 2–3 %. Beyond this distance, the decreasing rates become quite small. The bus-metro transfer distance can be extended to 6 km in the suburbs. For the effective and economical feeder transport allocation, a 3-km radius of the station is the focus area. The average elasticity of access/egress distance to metro mode share is −0.644 and −1.445, respectively in the central urban area and the suburb, indicating a larger variation compared with the result of −0.29 in North America. The number of parking lots within 50 m of the station is a critical factor for park-and-ride. We recommend providing diverse feeder bus operations and allocating the dedicated and human-oriented walking/cycling lanes within a 3-km radius of the station. In the suburbs, feeder buses can be extended to a longer range, about 6-km radius of the station according to the local demands. We suggest providing park-and-ride facilities within 50 m of the station and simultaneously encouraging shared parking lots. These planning suggestions can promote an efficient access to metro station pattern, optimize urban transport system's performance, and ultimately, obtain the low-carbon and sustainable transport development goal.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"171 ","pages":"Pages 867-881"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How far to allocate feeder transport to metro effectively? An empirical study in Xi'an, China\",\"authors\":\"Liu Yang ,&nbsp;Tieyue Zhang ,&nbsp;Yuanqing Wang ,&nbsp;Yujun Lian ,&nbsp;Yang Wang ,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Liu ,&nbsp;Heng Zhao ,&nbsp;Yutong Yuan ,&nbsp;Dinghui Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.07.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Metro construction has encouraged transport emission reductions in the recent decade. Analyzing access/egress distance to station is crucial for transport planning and implementation. In the recent contexts of fast metro construction and advancing information and networking technologies, various feeder transport emerged and access/egress distances to metro extended a lot, but few studies modeled metro mode share variation by access/egress distance. To determine the focus metro catchment area for effective feeder transport allocation, this study explores the threshold range of access/egress distance by walking, biking, bus and park-and-ride. The data comes from a sampling survey of household travel in Xi'an. The results show that, within a 3-km radius of the stations, metro mode shares decrease quickly from 16-23 % to 2–3 %. Beyond this distance, the decreasing rates become quite small. The bus-metro transfer distance can be extended to 6 km in the suburbs. For the effective and economical feeder transport allocation, a 3-km radius of the station is the focus area. The average elasticity of access/egress distance to metro mode share is −0.644 and −1.445, respectively in the central urban area and the suburb, indicating a larger variation compared with the result of −0.29 in North America. The number of parking lots within 50 m of the station is a critical factor for park-and-ride. We recommend providing diverse feeder bus operations and allocating the dedicated and human-oriented walking/cycling lanes within a 3-km radius of the station. In the suburbs, feeder buses can be extended to a longer range, about 6-km radius of the station according to the local demands. We suggest providing park-and-ride facilities within 50 m of the station and simultaneously encouraging shared parking lots. These planning suggestions can promote an efficient access to metro station pattern, optimize urban transport system's performance, and ultimately, obtain the low-carbon and sustainable transport development goal.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transport Policy\",\"volume\":\"171 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 867-881\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transport Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25002689\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25002689","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近十年来,地铁建设鼓励了交通减排。分析出入口到车站的距离对交通规划和实施至关重要。近年来,随着地铁建设的快速发展和信息网络技术的不断发展,各种支线交通方式不断涌现,地铁的出入口距离不断延长,但基于出入口距离的地铁模式共享变化模型研究较少。为了确定地铁集中汇水区,有效分配支线交通,本研究探讨了步行、骑自行车、公交和停车换乘的进出距离阈值范围。数据来自西安市家庭出行抽样调查。结果表明,在以站点为中心的3 km范围内,地铁出行占比从16- 23%迅速下降到2 - 3%。超过这个距离,衰减率就变得很小了。在郊区,公交和地铁的换乘距离可以延长到6公里。为了实现高效经济的支线运输配置,以车站半径3公里为重点区域。中心城区和郊区的地铁出入距离弹性平均值分别为- 0.644和- 1.445,与北美地区的- 0.29相比差异更大。车站50米范围内的停车场数量是停车换乘的关键因素。我们建议提供多样化的接驳巴士营运,并在车站3公里半径范围内分配以人为本的专用步行/单车道。在郊区,接驳巴士可以扩展到更远的范围,根据当地的需求,大约6公里半径的车站。建议在车站50米范围内提供泊车转乘设施,同时鼓励共享停车场。这些规划建议可以促进地铁站点模式的高效接入,优化城市交通系统的性能,最终实现低碳、可持续的交通发展目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How far to allocate feeder transport to metro effectively? An empirical study in Xi'an, China
Metro construction has encouraged transport emission reductions in the recent decade. Analyzing access/egress distance to station is crucial for transport planning and implementation. In the recent contexts of fast metro construction and advancing information and networking technologies, various feeder transport emerged and access/egress distances to metro extended a lot, but few studies modeled metro mode share variation by access/egress distance. To determine the focus metro catchment area for effective feeder transport allocation, this study explores the threshold range of access/egress distance by walking, biking, bus and park-and-ride. The data comes from a sampling survey of household travel in Xi'an. The results show that, within a 3-km radius of the stations, metro mode shares decrease quickly from 16-23 % to 2–3 %. Beyond this distance, the decreasing rates become quite small. The bus-metro transfer distance can be extended to 6 km in the suburbs. For the effective and economical feeder transport allocation, a 3-km radius of the station is the focus area. The average elasticity of access/egress distance to metro mode share is −0.644 and −1.445, respectively in the central urban area and the suburb, indicating a larger variation compared with the result of −0.29 in North America. The number of parking lots within 50 m of the station is a critical factor for park-and-ride. We recommend providing diverse feeder bus operations and allocating the dedicated and human-oriented walking/cycling lanes within a 3-km radius of the station. In the suburbs, feeder buses can be extended to a longer range, about 6-km radius of the station according to the local demands. We suggest providing park-and-ride facilities within 50 m of the station and simultaneously encouraging shared parking lots. These planning suggestions can promote an efficient access to metro station pattern, optimize urban transport system's performance, and ultimately, obtain the low-carbon and sustainable transport development goal.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信