Liu Yang , Tieyue Zhang , Yuanqing Wang , Yujun Lian , Yang Wang , Yuanyuan Liu , Heng Zhao , Yutong Yuan , Dinghui Zhou
{"title":"支线运输到地铁的有效分配距离有多远?以西安为例的实证研究","authors":"Liu Yang , Tieyue Zhang , Yuanqing Wang , Yujun Lian , Yang Wang , Yuanyuan Liu , Heng Zhao , Yutong Yuan , Dinghui Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.07.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Metro construction has encouraged transport emission reductions in the recent decade. Analyzing access/egress distance to station is crucial for transport planning and implementation. In the recent contexts of fast metro construction and advancing information and networking technologies, various feeder transport emerged and access/egress distances to metro extended a lot, but few studies modeled metro mode share variation by access/egress distance. To determine the focus metro catchment area for effective feeder transport allocation, this study explores the threshold range of access/egress distance by walking, biking, bus and park-and-ride. The data comes from a sampling survey of household travel in Xi'an. The results show that, within a 3-km radius of the stations, metro mode shares decrease quickly from 16-23 % to 2–3 %. Beyond this distance, the decreasing rates become quite small. The bus-metro transfer distance can be extended to 6 km in the suburbs. For the effective and economical feeder transport allocation, a 3-km radius of the station is the focus area. The average elasticity of access/egress distance to metro mode share is −0.644 and −1.445, respectively in the central urban area and the suburb, indicating a larger variation compared with the result of −0.29 in North America. The number of parking lots within 50 m of the station is a critical factor for park-and-ride. We recommend providing diverse feeder bus operations and allocating the dedicated and human-oriented walking/cycling lanes within a 3-km radius of the station. In the suburbs, feeder buses can be extended to a longer range, about 6-km radius of the station according to the local demands. We suggest providing park-and-ride facilities within 50 m of the station and simultaneously encouraging shared parking lots. These planning suggestions can promote an efficient access to metro station pattern, optimize urban transport system's performance, and ultimately, obtain the low-carbon and sustainable transport development goal.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"171 ","pages":"Pages 867-881"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How far to allocate feeder transport to metro effectively? An empirical study in Xi'an, China\",\"authors\":\"Liu Yang , Tieyue Zhang , Yuanqing Wang , Yujun Lian , Yang Wang , Yuanyuan Liu , Heng Zhao , Yutong Yuan , Dinghui Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.07.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Metro construction has encouraged transport emission reductions in the recent decade. Analyzing access/egress distance to station is crucial for transport planning and implementation. In the recent contexts of fast metro construction and advancing information and networking technologies, various feeder transport emerged and access/egress distances to metro extended a lot, but few studies modeled metro mode share variation by access/egress distance. To determine the focus metro catchment area for effective feeder transport allocation, this study explores the threshold range of access/egress distance by walking, biking, bus and park-and-ride. The data comes from a sampling survey of household travel in Xi'an. The results show that, within a 3-km radius of the stations, metro mode shares decrease quickly from 16-23 % to 2–3 %. Beyond this distance, the decreasing rates become quite small. The bus-metro transfer distance can be extended to 6 km in the suburbs. For the effective and economical feeder transport allocation, a 3-km radius of the station is the focus area. The average elasticity of access/egress distance to metro mode share is −0.644 and −1.445, respectively in the central urban area and the suburb, indicating a larger variation compared with the result of −0.29 in North America. The number of parking lots within 50 m of the station is a critical factor for park-and-ride. We recommend providing diverse feeder bus operations and allocating the dedicated and human-oriented walking/cycling lanes within a 3-km radius of the station. In the suburbs, feeder buses can be extended to a longer range, about 6-km radius of the station according to the local demands. We suggest providing park-and-ride facilities within 50 m of the station and simultaneously encouraging shared parking lots. These planning suggestions can promote an efficient access to metro station pattern, optimize urban transport system's performance, and ultimately, obtain the low-carbon and sustainable transport development goal.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transport Policy\",\"volume\":\"171 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 867-881\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transport Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25002689\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25002689","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
How far to allocate feeder transport to metro effectively? An empirical study in Xi'an, China
Metro construction has encouraged transport emission reductions in the recent decade. Analyzing access/egress distance to station is crucial for transport planning and implementation. In the recent contexts of fast metro construction and advancing information and networking technologies, various feeder transport emerged and access/egress distances to metro extended a lot, but few studies modeled metro mode share variation by access/egress distance. To determine the focus metro catchment area for effective feeder transport allocation, this study explores the threshold range of access/egress distance by walking, biking, bus and park-and-ride. The data comes from a sampling survey of household travel in Xi'an. The results show that, within a 3-km radius of the stations, metro mode shares decrease quickly from 16-23 % to 2–3 %. Beyond this distance, the decreasing rates become quite small. The bus-metro transfer distance can be extended to 6 km in the suburbs. For the effective and economical feeder transport allocation, a 3-km radius of the station is the focus area. The average elasticity of access/egress distance to metro mode share is −0.644 and −1.445, respectively in the central urban area and the suburb, indicating a larger variation compared with the result of −0.29 in North America. The number of parking lots within 50 m of the station is a critical factor for park-and-ride. We recommend providing diverse feeder bus operations and allocating the dedicated and human-oriented walking/cycling lanes within a 3-km radius of the station. In the suburbs, feeder buses can be extended to a longer range, about 6-km radius of the station according to the local demands. We suggest providing park-and-ride facilities within 50 m of the station and simultaneously encouraging shared parking lots. These planning suggestions can promote an efficient access to metro station pattern, optimize urban transport system's performance, and ultimately, obtain the low-carbon and sustainable transport development goal.
期刊介绍:
Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.