{"title":"收缩:直接抽吸与卵泡冲洗在接受卵胞浆内单精子注射的不良反应:一项随机对照试验","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>\n RETRACTION: <span>B. Haydardedeoglu</span>, <span>F. Gjemalaj</span>, <span>P.C. Aytac</span>, and <span>E.B. Killicdag</span>, “ <span>Direct Aspiration Versus Follicular Flushing in Poor Responders Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection: A Randomised Controlled Trial</span>,” <i>BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology</i> <span>124</span>, no. <span>8</span> (<span>2017</span>): <span>1190</span>–<span>1196</span>, https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14629.\n </p>\n <p>The above article, published online on 09 March 2017 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor-in-Chief, Aris Papageorghiou; and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. UK. Concerns were raised by a third party regarding the randomized control trial and the successful implementation of randomization. The third party was unable to recalculate the statistical results presented in Table 1, raising concerns that the statistical reports were also flawed. The authors provided their raw dataset to the journal so it could be evaluated by an independent expert. This expert confirmed that many of the statistical results were not reproducible using the reported methods. They also found several inconsistencies and errors within the article, including the duplication of two participants in the dataset. As a result, the data and conclusions are considered unreliable and the article must be retracted.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.18319","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RETRACTION: Direct Aspiration Versus Follicular Flushing in Poor Responders Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection: A Randomised Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1471-0528.18319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>\\n RETRACTION: <span>B. Haydardedeoglu</span>, <span>F. Gjemalaj</span>, <span>P.C. Aytac</span>, and <span>E.B. Killicdag</span>, “ <span>Direct Aspiration Versus Follicular Flushing in Poor Responders Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection: A Randomised Controlled Trial</span>,” <i>BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology</i> <span>124</span>, no. <span>8</span> (<span>2017</span>): <span>1190</span>–<span>1196</span>, https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14629.\\n </p>\\n <p>The above article, published online on 09 March 2017 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor-in-Chief, Aris Papageorghiou; and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. UK. Concerns were raised by a third party regarding the randomized control trial and the successful implementation of randomization. The third party was unable to recalculate the statistical results presented in Table 1, raising concerns that the statistical reports were also flawed. The authors provided their raw dataset to the journal so it could be evaluated by an independent expert. This expert confirmed that many of the statistical results were not reproducible using the reported methods. They also found several inconsistencies and errors within the article, including the duplication of two participants in the dataset. As a result, the data and conclusions are considered unreliable and the article must be retracted.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"132 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.18319\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.18319\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.18319","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
RETRACTION: Direct Aspiration Versus Follicular Flushing in Poor Responders Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection: A Randomised Controlled Trial
RETRACTION: B. Haydardedeoglu, F. Gjemalaj, P.C. Aytac, and E.B. Killicdag, “ Direct Aspiration Versus Follicular Flushing in Poor Responders Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection: A Randomised Controlled Trial,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology124, no. 8 (2017): 1190–1196, https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14629.
The above article, published online on 09 March 2017 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor-in-Chief, Aris Papageorghiou; and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. UK. Concerns were raised by a third party regarding the randomized control trial and the successful implementation of randomization. The third party was unable to recalculate the statistical results presented in Table 1, raising concerns that the statistical reports were also flawed. The authors provided their raw dataset to the journal so it could be evaluated by an independent expert. This expert confirmed that many of the statistical results were not reproducible using the reported methods. They also found several inconsistencies and errors within the article, including the duplication of two participants in the dataset. As a result, the data and conclusions are considered unreliable and the article must be retracted.
期刊介绍:
BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.