COVID-19大流行期间澳大利亚和新西兰透析实践模式的变化

IF 1.9
Daniela Potter, Kevan R Polkinghorne, Annie Conway, Christopher E Davies, Eric Au, Andrew Pilmore, Helmant Kulkarni, Mathew Blake Roberts, Peter Kolovos, Claire Dendle, Solomon Menahem, Sradha Kotwal
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间澳大利亚和新西兰透析实践模式的变化","authors":"Daniela Potter, Kevan R Polkinghorne, Annie Conway, Christopher E Davies, Eric Au, Andrew Pilmore, Helmant Kulkarni, Mathew Blake Roberts, Peter Kolovos, Claire Dendle, Solomon Menahem, Sradha Kotwal","doi":"10.1111/nep.70077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic caused widespread global disruptions to healthcare systems. There has been no assessment of this on dialysis practice at a binational level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-centre retrospective observational cohort study using data from the ANZDATA Registry was performed, with adult incident dialysis patients (1 January 2018 to 31 December 2022). Patients commencing dialysis during 2020-2022 were compared to 2018-2019 for the primary outcome of dialysis incidence rate. Secondary outcomes included estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at dialysis start, initial treatment location (home vs. facility), modality (haemodialysis vs. peritoneal dialysis), haemodialysis access, frequency, and duration. Commencement during lockdown in 2020-2021 was also analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>11 690 patients commenced dialysis during 2020-2022 and 7366 commenced during 2018-2019, with no differences in incidence rate across the pandemic years (2020: p = 0.163, 2021: p = 0.139, 2022: p = 0.190). Compared to pre-pandemic years, uptake of home-based therapies was higher in 2020 (OR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.06-1.27, p = 0.002) with no difference in 2021 and 2022. Peritoneal dialysis uptake was higher in 2020 (OR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.04-1.26, p = 0.005) and 2021 (OR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.21, p = 0.037) with no difference in 2022. Haemodialysis patients were less likely to commence with an arteriovenous fistula or graft in 2022, compared to pre-pandemic years (OR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.96, p = 0.005). Odds of commencing haemodialysis with an arteriovenous fistula or graft were reduced during lockdown (OR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.95, p = 0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no change in the incidence rate of dialysis patients during 2020-2022, although there were differences in home dialysis uptake and starting access type.</p>","PeriodicalId":520716,"journal":{"name":"Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.)","volume":"30 7","pages":"e70077"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277125/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in Dialysis Practice Patterns in Australia and New Zealand During the COVID-19 Pandemic Period.\",\"authors\":\"Daniela Potter, Kevan R Polkinghorne, Annie Conway, Christopher E Davies, Eric Au, Andrew Pilmore, Helmant Kulkarni, Mathew Blake Roberts, Peter Kolovos, Claire Dendle, Solomon Menahem, Sradha Kotwal\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nep.70077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic caused widespread global disruptions to healthcare systems. There has been no assessment of this on dialysis practice at a binational level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-centre retrospective observational cohort study using data from the ANZDATA Registry was performed, with adult incident dialysis patients (1 January 2018 to 31 December 2022). Patients commencing dialysis during 2020-2022 were compared to 2018-2019 for the primary outcome of dialysis incidence rate. Secondary outcomes included estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at dialysis start, initial treatment location (home vs. facility), modality (haemodialysis vs. peritoneal dialysis), haemodialysis access, frequency, and duration. Commencement during lockdown in 2020-2021 was also analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>11 690 patients commenced dialysis during 2020-2022 and 7366 commenced during 2018-2019, with no differences in incidence rate across the pandemic years (2020: p = 0.163, 2021: p = 0.139, 2022: p = 0.190). Compared to pre-pandemic years, uptake of home-based therapies was higher in 2020 (OR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.06-1.27, p = 0.002) with no difference in 2021 and 2022. Peritoneal dialysis uptake was higher in 2020 (OR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.04-1.26, p = 0.005) and 2021 (OR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.21, p = 0.037) with no difference in 2022. Haemodialysis patients were less likely to commence with an arteriovenous fistula or graft in 2022, compared to pre-pandemic years (OR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.96, p = 0.005). Odds of commencing haemodialysis with an arteriovenous fistula or graft were reduced during lockdown (OR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.95, p = 0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no change in the incidence rate of dialysis patients during 2020-2022, although there were differences in home dialysis uptake and starting access type.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.)\",\"volume\":\"30 7\",\"pages\":\"e70077\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277125/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nep.70077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nep.70077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:2019冠状病毒病大流行对全球医疗系统造成了广泛的破坏。目前还没有在两国层面对透析实践进行评估。方法:使用ANZDATA Registry的数据进行一项多中心回顾性观察队列研究,研究对象为成人意外透析患者(2018年1月1日至2022年12月31日)。将2020-2022年开始透析的患者与2018-2019年透析发生率的主要结局进行比较。次要结局包括透析开始时估计的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)、初始治疗地点(家庭与设施)、方式(血液透析与腹膜透析)、血液透析途径、频率和持续时间。还分析了2020-2021年封城期间的开工情况。结果:11690名患者在2020-2022年开始透析,7366名患者在2018-2019年开始透析,在大流行年份的发病率没有差异(2020年:p = 0.163, 2021年:p = 0.139, 2022年:p = 0.190)。与大流行前相比,2020年家庭疗法的使用率更高(OR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.06-1.27, p = 0.002), 2021年和2022年无差异。腹膜透析摄取在2020年(OR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.04-1.26, p = 0.005)和2021年(OR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.21, p = 0.037)较高,2022年无差异。与大流行前相比,血液透析患者在2022年开始使用动静脉瘘或移植物的可能性较低(or = 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.96, p = 0.005)。在锁定期间,动静脉瘘或移植物开始血液透析的几率降低(or = 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.95, p = 0.014)。结论:2020-2022年期间透析患者的发生率没有变化,但家庭透析摄取和起始途径类型存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Changes in Dialysis Practice Patterns in Australia and New Zealand During the COVID-19 Pandemic Period.

Changes in Dialysis Practice Patterns in Australia and New Zealand During the COVID-19 Pandemic Period.

Aim: The COVID-19 pandemic caused widespread global disruptions to healthcare systems. There has been no assessment of this on dialysis practice at a binational level.

Methods: A multi-centre retrospective observational cohort study using data from the ANZDATA Registry was performed, with adult incident dialysis patients (1 January 2018 to 31 December 2022). Patients commencing dialysis during 2020-2022 were compared to 2018-2019 for the primary outcome of dialysis incidence rate. Secondary outcomes included estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at dialysis start, initial treatment location (home vs. facility), modality (haemodialysis vs. peritoneal dialysis), haemodialysis access, frequency, and duration. Commencement during lockdown in 2020-2021 was also analysed.

Results: 11 690 patients commenced dialysis during 2020-2022 and 7366 commenced during 2018-2019, with no differences in incidence rate across the pandemic years (2020: p = 0.163, 2021: p = 0.139, 2022: p = 0.190). Compared to pre-pandemic years, uptake of home-based therapies was higher in 2020 (OR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.06-1.27, p = 0.002) with no difference in 2021 and 2022. Peritoneal dialysis uptake was higher in 2020 (OR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.04-1.26, p = 0.005) and 2021 (OR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.21, p = 0.037) with no difference in 2022. Haemodialysis patients were less likely to commence with an arteriovenous fistula or graft in 2022, compared to pre-pandemic years (OR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.96, p = 0.005). Odds of commencing haemodialysis with an arteriovenous fistula or graft were reduced during lockdown (OR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.95, p = 0.014).

Conclusion: There was no change in the incidence rate of dialysis patients during 2020-2022, although there were differences in home dialysis uptake and starting access type.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信