Vera M Ludwig, Carl A Bittendorf, Iris Reinhard, Marvin Guth, Esther Mühlbauer, Lisa-Marie Hartnagel, Wolfram E Severus, Michael Bauer, Philipp Ritter, Ulrich W Ebner-Priemer
{"title":"基于被动感知数据的统计过程控制方法预测双相情感障碍患者抑郁和躁狂发作。","authors":"Vera M Ludwig, Carl A Bittendorf, Iris Reinhard, Marvin Guth, Esther Mühlbauer, Lisa-Marie Hartnagel, Wolfram E Severus, Michael Bauer, Philipp Ritter, Ulrich W Ebner-Priemer","doi":"10.1037/abn0001002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early detection of emerging affective episodes is crucial in managing bipolar disorders (BD). Passive sensing-passive data collection via smartphone or wearable-offers a promising solution by potentially capturing altered activity, communication, and sleep patterns, indicative of manic and depressive episodes. Recently, statistical process control (SPC) has been introduced to psychopathology as a novel approach to identifying out-of-bounds processes. However, its application to mobile sensing data and to BD remains unexplored. To investigate SPC's potential in detecting emerging affective episodes, we utilized the BipoSense study, which monitored patients with BD. The BipoSense data cover 12 months of continuously collected passive sensing data via smartphone app, daily e-diary data, and biweekly expert interviews, that is, 26 in a row, to assess the psychopathological status. Compliance was excellent. A total of 26 depressive and 20 (hypo)manic emerging episodes in 28 patients were included in the analyses. SPC charts and multilevel analyses revealed heterogeneous results. Passive sensing, despite its potential as a low-burden, continuous measurement tool, did not demonstrate robust detection of affective episodes or preepisode weeks. Self-rated current bipolar mood, assessed via e-diary, outperformed passive sensing parameters in predicting current episodes, whereas predicting preepisode weeks was also limited. Notably, SPC with personalized control limits did not surpass established clinical cutoff scores. Even after systematic optimization of SPC settings, the combination of detected emerging episodes in relation to false alarms was insufficient for clinical use. Future studies warrant mobile sensing parameters closer aligned to psychopathology, thereby increasing validity, sensitivity, and specificity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":73914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting depressive and manic episodes in patients with bipolar disorder using statistical process control methods on passive sensing data.\",\"authors\":\"Vera M Ludwig, Carl A Bittendorf, Iris Reinhard, Marvin Guth, Esther Mühlbauer, Lisa-Marie Hartnagel, Wolfram E Severus, Michael Bauer, Philipp Ritter, Ulrich W Ebner-Priemer\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/abn0001002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Early detection of emerging affective episodes is crucial in managing bipolar disorders (BD). Passive sensing-passive data collection via smartphone or wearable-offers a promising solution by potentially capturing altered activity, communication, and sleep patterns, indicative of manic and depressive episodes. Recently, statistical process control (SPC) has been introduced to psychopathology as a novel approach to identifying out-of-bounds processes. However, its application to mobile sensing data and to BD remains unexplored. To investigate SPC's potential in detecting emerging affective episodes, we utilized the BipoSense study, which monitored patients with BD. The BipoSense data cover 12 months of continuously collected passive sensing data via smartphone app, daily e-diary data, and biweekly expert interviews, that is, 26 in a row, to assess the psychopathological status. Compliance was excellent. A total of 26 depressive and 20 (hypo)manic emerging episodes in 28 patients were included in the analyses. SPC charts and multilevel analyses revealed heterogeneous results. Passive sensing, despite its potential as a low-burden, continuous measurement tool, did not demonstrate robust detection of affective episodes or preepisode weeks. Self-rated current bipolar mood, assessed via e-diary, outperformed passive sensing parameters in predicting current episodes, whereas predicting preepisode weeks was also limited. Notably, SPC with personalized control limits did not surpass established clinical cutoff scores. Even after systematic optimization of SPC settings, the combination of detected emerging episodes in relation to false alarms was insufficient for clinical use. Future studies warrant mobile sensing parameters closer aligned to psychopathology, thereby increasing validity, sensitivity, and specificity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0001002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0001002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
早期发现新出现的情感发作是管理双相情感障碍(BD)的关键。被动感知——通过智能手机或可穿戴设备收集被动数据——提供了一个很有前途的解决方案,它有可能捕捉到活动、交流和睡眠模式的改变,这些都是躁狂和抑郁发作的迹象。最近,统计过程控制(SPC)作为一种识别越界过程的新方法被引入精神病理学。然而,它在移动传感数据和BD中的应用仍未探索。为了研究SPC在检测新出现的情感发作方面的潜力,我们利用了BipoSense研究,该研究监测了BD患者。BipoSense数据包括12个月通过智能手机应用程序连续收集的被动传感数据、每日电子日记数据和双周专家访谈,即连续26次,以评估精神病理状态。依从性非常好。28例患者共出现26次抑郁和20次(轻度)躁狂发作。SPC图表和多水平分析揭示了异质性结果。被动感知,尽管其作为一种低负担、连续测量工具的潜力,并没有显示出对情感发作或发作前周的强大检测。通过电子日记评估的自评当前双相情绪在预测当前发作方面优于被动感知参数,而预测发作前的周数也是有限的。值得注意的是,具有个性化控制限制的SPC没有超过既定的临床截止分数。即使在系统优化SPC设置之后,检测到的与假警报相关的新发作的组合也不足以用于临床应用。未来的研究保证移动传感参数更接近精神病理学,从而提高有效性,敏感性和特异性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Predicting depressive and manic episodes in patients with bipolar disorder using statistical process control methods on passive sensing data.
Early detection of emerging affective episodes is crucial in managing bipolar disorders (BD). Passive sensing-passive data collection via smartphone or wearable-offers a promising solution by potentially capturing altered activity, communication, and sleep patterns, indicative of manic and depressive episodes. Recently, statistical process control (SPC) has been introduced to psychopathology as a novel approach to identifying out-of-bounds processes. However, its application to mobile sensing data and to BD remains unexplored. To investigate SPC's potential in detecting emerging affective episodes, we utilized the BipoSense study, which monitored patients with BD. The BipoSense data cover 12 months of continuously collected passive sensing data via smartphone app, daily e-diary data, and biweekly expert interviews, that is, 26 in a row, to assess the psychopathological status. Compliance was excellent. A total of 26 depressive and 20 (hypo)manic emerging episodes in 28 patients were included in the analyses. SPC charts and multilevel analyses revealed heterogeneous results. Passive sensing, despite its potential as a low-burden, continuous measurement tool, did not demonstrate robust detection of affective episodes or preepisode weeks. Self-rated current bipolar mood, assessed via e-diary, outperformed passive sensing parameters in predicting current episodes, whereas predicting preepisode weeks was also limited. Notably, SPC with personalized control limits did not surpass established clinical cutoff scores. Even after systematic optimization of SPC settings, the combination of detected emerging episodes in relation to false alarms was insufficient for clinical use. Future studies warrant mobile sensing parameters closer aligned to psychopathology, thereby increasing validity, sensitivity, and specificity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).