肾细胞癌患者的衰弱和生存:一项荟萃分析。

0 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Longye Zhang, Weiping Liu, Bo Ning, Bohan Chen
{"title":"肾细胞癌患者的衰弱和生存:一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Longye Zhang, Weiping Liu, Bo Ning, Bohan Chen","doi":"10.17305/bb.2025.12687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Frailty is a multidimensional syndrome reflecting decreased physiological reserve and increased vulnerability to stressors, which may adversely affect cancer prognosis. However, its impact on survival outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between frailty and survival in RCC patients. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted for longitudinal studies assessing frailty in adults with RCC. Studies using validated frailty assessment tools and reporting overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS) were included. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to explore heterogeneity. Eight cohort studies involving 15,989 RCC patients were included. Frailty was associated with significantly poorer OS (HR = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.45-2.20; I² = 30%) and PFS (HR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.54-3.04; I² = 0%). The association between frailty and OS remained robust across sensitivity analyses by excluding one study at a time and was consistent across subgroups stratified by cancer stage, treatment modality, patient age, frailty assessment method, follow-up duration, and analytic model (all p values for subgroup differences > 0.05). Subtype-specific data according to the histologic type of RCC were unavailable, which limits detailed prognostic interpretation. No significant publication bias was detected. Frailty may be significantly associated with poorer survival outcomes in patients with RCC. Incorporating frailty assessment into routine clinical evaluation may aid in prognostication and individualized treatment planning for this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":72398,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecules & biomedicine","volume":" ","pages":"2620-2631"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12461282/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frailty and survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Longye Zhang, Weiping Liu, Bo Ning, Bohan Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.17305/bb.2025.12687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Frailty is a multidimensional syndrome reflecting decreased physiological reserve and increased vulnerability to stressors, which may adversely affect cancer prognosis. However, its impact on survival outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between frailty and survival in RCC patients. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted for longitudinal studies assessing frailty in adults with RCC. Studies using validated frailty assessment tools and reporting overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS) were included. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to explore heterogeneity. Eight cohort studies involving 15,989 RCC patients were included. Frailty was associated with significantly poorer OS (HR = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.45-2.20; I² = 30%) and PFS (HR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.54-3.04; I² = 0%). The association between frailty and OS remained robust across sensitivity analyses by excluding one study at a time and was consistent across subgroups stratified by cancer stage, treatment modality, patient age, frailty assessment method, follow-up duration, and analytic model (all p values for subgroup differences > 0.05). Subtype-specific data according to the histologic type of RCC were unavailable, which limits detailed prognostic interpretation. No significant publication bias was detected. Frailty may be significantly associated with poorer survival outcomes in patients with RCC. Incorporating frailty assessment into routine clinical evaluation may aid in prognostication and individualized treatment planning for this patient population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomolecules & biomedicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2620-2631\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12461282/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomolecules & biomedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17305/bb.2025.12687\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecules & biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17305/bb.2025.12687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虚弱是一种反映生理储备下降和对压力源易感性增加的多维综合征,可能对癌症预后产生不利影响。然而,其对肾细胞癌(RCC)患者生存结局的影响尚不清楚。本荟萃分析旨在评估RCC患者虚弱和生存之间的关系。对PubMed、Embase和Web of Science进行了系统的检索,以进行纵向研究,评估成年RCC患者的脆弱性。纳入了使用经过验证的衰弱评估工具并报告总生存期(OS)和/或无进展生存期(PFS)的研究。采用随机效应模型计算合并风险比(hr)和95%置信区间(ci)。进行亚组分析和敏感性分析以探索异质性。纳入了8项队列研究,涉及15989例RCC患者。虚弱与较差的OS相关(HR = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.45-2.20;I²= 30%)和PFS (HR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.54-3.04;I²= 0%)。通过一次排除一项研究的敏感性分析,虚弱和OS之间的关联仍然是稳健的,并且在按癌症分期、治疗方式、患者年龄、虚弱评估方法、随访时间和分析模型分层的亚组中是一致的(亚组差异的所有p值均为0.05)。根据RCC的组织学类型无法获得亚型特异性数据,这限制了详细的预后解释。未发现显著的发表偏倚。虚弱可能与肾细胞癌患者较差的生存结果显著相关。将衰弱评估纳入常规临床评估可能有助于对该患者群体的预后和个性化治疗计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frailty and survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis.

Frailty is a multidimensional syndrome reflecting decreased physiological reserve and increased vulnerability to stressors, which may adversely affect cancer prognosis. However, its impact on survival outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between frailty and survival in RCC patients. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted for longitudinal studies assessing frailty in adults with RCC. Studies using validated frailty assessment tools and reporting overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS) were included. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to explore heterogeneity. Eight cohort studies involving 15,989 RCC patients were included. Frailty was associated with significantly poorer OS (HR = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.45-2.20; I² = 30%) and PFS (HR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.54-3.04; I² = 0%). The association between frailty and OS remained robust across sensitivity analyses by excluding one study at a time and was consistent across subgroups stratified by cancer stage, treatment modality, patient age, frailty assessment method, follow-up duration, and analytic model (all p values for subgroup differences > 0.05). Subtype-specific data according to the histologic type of RCC were unavailable, which limits detailed prognostic interpretation. No significant publication bias was detected. Frailty may be significantly associated with poorer survival outcomes in patients with RCC. Incorporating frailty assessment into routine clinical evaluation may aid in prognostication and individualized treatment planning for this patient population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信