{"title":"莫匹罗星软膏与碱性成纤维细胞生长因子凝胶治疗小儿复发性前鼻出血的比较:随机、对照、单盲研究。","authors":"Zhengcai Lou , Zihan Lou , Zhengnong Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.anl.2025.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective of this study was to compare the short-and medium-term effectiveness of Mupirocin ointment (2 %) (MUO) and recombinant bovine basic fibroblast growth factor eye-gel (bFGF) in the treatment of recurrent anterior epistaxis (RAE) in children.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>children with RAE were randomly allocated into MUO group or bFGF group. The recurrence epistaxis,epistaxis severity score (ESS),and visual analog scale (VAS) were compared among two groups at 4 weeks and 3 months.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This study included 371 children with RAE.The recurrence epistaxis was 44.57 % in the MUO group and 30.81 % in the bFGF group at posttreatment 4 weeks (<em>P</em> < 0.05). Also, the recurrence epistaxis rate was 63.59 % in the MUO group and 28.65 % in the bFGF group at posttreatment 3 months (<em>P</em> < 0.001). Furthermore, in the MUO group, there was not significant difference in the recurrence epistaxis rate between the patients with AR and non-AR at posttreatment 4 weeks (<em>P</em> > 0.05), while there was not significant difference in the recurrence epistaxis rate between the patients with AR and non-AR at posttreatment 4 weeks (<em>P</em> = 0.309) in the bFGF group. In the MUO group, 42.5 % patients reported the pricking of nasal cavity and discomfort in 70.4 %, whereas no any patients did in the bFGF group. Moreover, at each follow-up time point, the mean ESS score in the bFGF group was significantly lower than that in the MUO group.VAS scores for itchy nose or nasal crusts, the improvement in the bFGF group was better compared with the MUO group at 4 weeks and 3 months.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>bFGF Gel has a lower rate of recurrent epistaxis and better short-and medium-term effectiveness in the treatment of RAE in children compared with Mupirocin ointment, additionally, bFGF has no the pricking and discomfort of nasal cavity,thus resulting in well children's compliance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55627,"journal":{"name":"Auris Nasus Larynx","volume":"52 4","pages":"Pages 516-521"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Mupirocin ointment and basic fibroblast growth factor gel in the treatment of pediatric recurrent anterior epistaxis: Randomized, controlled, single blind study\",\"authors\":\"Zhengcai Lou , Zihan Lou , Zhengnong Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anl.2025.07.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective of this study was to compare the short-and medium-term effectiveness of Mupirocin ointment (2 %) (MUO) and recombinant bovine basic fibroblast growth factor eye-gel (bFGF) in the treatment of recurrent anterior epistaxis (RAE) in children.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>children with RAE were randomly allocated into MUO group or bFGF group. The recurrence epistaxis,epistaxis severity score (ESS),and visual analog scale (VAS) were compared among two groups at 4 weeks and 3 months.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This study included 371 children with RAE.The recurrence epistaxis was 44.57 % in the MUO group and 30.81 % in the bFGF group at posttreatment 4 weeks (<em>P</em> < 0.05). Also, the recurrence epistaxis rate was 63.59 % in the MUO group and 28.65 % in the bFGF group at posttreatment 3 months (<em>P</em> < 0.001). Furthermore, in the MUO group, there was not significant difference in the recurrence epistaxis rate between the patients with AR and non-AR at posttreatment 4 weeks (<em>P</em> > 0.05), while there was not significant difference in the recurrence epistaxis rate between the patients with AR and non-AR at posttreatment 4 weeks (<em>P</em> = 0.309) in the bFGF group. In the MUO group, 42.5 % patients reported the pricking of nasal cavity and discomfort in 70.4 %, whereas no any patients did in the bFGF group. Moreover, at each follow-up time point, the mean ESS score in the bFGF group was significantly lower than that in the MUO group.VAS scores for itchy nose or nasal crusts, the improvement in the bFGF group was better compared with the MUO group at 4 weeks and 3 months.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>bFGF Gel has a lower rate of recurrent epistaxis and better short-and medium-term effectiveness in the treatment of RAE in children compared with Mupirocin ointment, additionally, bFGF has no the pricking and discomfort of nasal cavity,thus resulting in well children's compliance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Auris Nasus Larynx\",\"volume\":\"52 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 516-521\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Auris Nasus Larynx\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0385814625001063\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auris Nasus Larynx","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0385814625001063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Mupirocin ointment and basic fibroblast growth factor gel in the treatment of pediatric recurrent anterior epistaxis: Randomized, controlled, single blind study
Objective
The objective of this study was to compare the short-and medium-term effectiveness of Mupirocin ointment (2 %) (MUO) and recombinant bovine basic fibroblast growth factor eye-gel (bFGF) in the treatment of recurrent anterior epistaxis (RAE) in children.
Material and methods
children with RAE were randomly allocated into MUO group or bFGF group. The recurrence epistaxis,epistaxis severity score (ESS),and visual analog scale (VAS) were compared among two groups at 4 weeks and 3 months.
Results
This study included 371 children with RAE.The recurrence epistaxis was 44.57 % in the MUO group and 30.81 % in the bFGF group at posttreatment 4 weeks (P < 0.05). Also, the recurrence epistaxis rate was 63.59 % in the MUO group and 28.65 % in the bFGF group at posttreatment 3 months (P < 0.001). Furthermore, in the MUO group, there was not significant difference in the recurrence epistaxis rate between the patients with AR and non-AR at posttreatment 4 weeks (P > 0.05), while there was not significant difference in the recurrence epistaxis rate between the patients with AR and non-AR at posttreatment 4 weeks (P = 0.309) in the bFGF group. In the MUO group, 42.5 % patients reported the pricking of nasal cavity and discomfort in 70.4 %, whereas no any patients did in the bFGF group. Moreover, at each follow-up time point, the mean ESS score in the bFGF group was significantly lower than that in the MUO group.VAS scores for itchy nose or nasal crusts, the improvement in the bFGF group was better compared with the MUO group at 4 weeks and 3 months.
Conclusion
bFGF Gel has a lower rate of recurrent epistaxis and better short-and medium-term effectiveness in the treatment of RAE in children compared with Mupirocin ointment, additionally, bFGF has no the pricking and discomfort of nasal cavity,thus resulting in well children's compliance.
期刊介绍:
The international journal Auris Nasus Larynx provides the opportunity for rapid, carefully reviewed publications concerning the fundamental and clinical aspects of otorhinolaryngology and related fields. This includes otology, neurotology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, allergology, head and neck medicine and oncologic surgery, maxillofacial and plastic surgery, audiology, speech science.
Original papers, short communications and original case reports can be submitted. Reviews on recent developments are invited regularly and Letters to the Editor commenting on papers or any aspect of Auris Nasus Larynx are welcomed.
Founded in 1973 and previously published by the Society for Promotion of International Otorhinolaryngology, the journal is now the official English-language journal of the Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Society of Japan, Inc. The aim of its new international Editorial Board is to make Auris Nasus Larynx an international forum for high quality research and clinical sciences.