GABA、谷氨酸和Glx水平在治疗重度抑郁症中的作用:一项系统综述和荟萃分析

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Kate Godfrey , Hannah Douglass , David Erritzoe , Suresh Muthukumaraswamy , David Nutt , Rachael Sumner
{"title":"GABA、谷氨酸和Glx水平在治疗重度抑郁症中的作用:一项系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Kate Godfrey ,&nbsp;Hannah Douglass ,&nbsp;David Erritzoe ,&nbsp;Suresh Muthukumaraswamy ,&nbsp;David Nutt ,&nbsp;Rachael Sumner","doi":"10.1016/j.pnpbp.2025.111455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to explore a possible role of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate, as measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS), in the treatment outcomes of people with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Despite the prevalence of MDD and various treatment modalities, the neurobiological mechanisms of each remain poorly understood. We synthesised data from 41 longitudinal studies comprising 918 individuals with MDD, spanning four primary treatment modalities: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), ketamine, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).</div><div>Pooled analyses revealed a significant increase in Glx levels post-treatment across modalities, with this effect persisting in responder-only subgroups and analyses restricted to prefrontal regions. In contrast, no consistent changes were observed in GABA or glutamate levels following treatment. These results suggest that modulation of Glx, but not bulk GABA or glutamate, may be a common neurobiological mechanism underlying therapeutic response in MDD. However, a role for GABAergic systems cannot be excluded, as functionally relevant changes may occur without detectable shifts in overall concentration. We recommend future studies prioritise reporting by responder status and employ higher-field MRS techniques to more precisely characterise treatment-related bulk metabolite changes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54549,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 111455"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of GABA, glutamate, and Glx levels in treatment of major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Kate Godfrey ,&nbsp;Hannah Douglass ,&nbsp;David Erritzoe ,&nbsp;Suresh Muthukumaraswamy ,&nbsp;David Nutt ,&nbsp;Rachael Sumner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pnpbp.2025.111455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to explore a possible role of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate, as measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS), in the treatment outcomes of people with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Despite the prevalence of MDD and various treatment modalities, the neurobiological mechanisms of each remain poorly understood. We synthesised data from 41 longitudinal studies comprising 918 individuals with MDD, spanning four primary treatment modalities: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), ketamine, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).</div><div>Pooled analyses revealed a significant increase in Glx levels post-treatment across modalities, with this effect persisting in responder-only subgroups and analyses restricted to prefrontal regions. In contrast, no consistent changes were observed in GABA or glutamate levels following treatment. These results suggest that modulation of Glx, but not bulk GABA or glutamate, may be a common neurobiological mechanism underlying therapeutic response in MDD. However, a role for GABAergic systems cannot be excluded, as functionally relevant changes may occur without detectable shifts in overall concentration. We recommend future studies prioritise reporting by responder status and employ higher-field MRS techniques to more precisely characterise treatment-related bulk metabolite changes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"141 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111455\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027858462500209X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027858462500209X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在探讨γ -氨基丁酸(GABA)和谷氨酸在重度抑郁症(MDD)患者治疗结果中的可能作用,通过磁共振波谱(MRS)测量。尽管重度抑郁症的流行和各种治疗方式,但每种治疗方式的神经生物学机制仍然知之甚少。我们综合了41项纵向研究的数据,包括918名重度抑郁症患者,涵盖四种主要治疗方式:选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)、氯胺酮、重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)和电休克治疗(ECT)。综合分析显示,各种治疗方式治疗后Glx水平显著增加,这种影响在仅反应亚组和仅限于前额叶区域的分析中持续存在。相比之下,治疗后GABA或谷氨酸水平没有一致的变化。这些结果表明Glx的调节,而不是大量GABA或谷氨酸的调节,可能是MDD治疗反应的共同神经生物学机制。然而,gaba能系统的作用不能被排除,因为功能相关的变化可能发生在总体浓度没有可检测到的变化的情况下。我们建议未来的研究优先报告应答者状态,并采用高场磁共振技术更精确地表征与治疗相关的大量代谢物变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of GABA, glutamate, and Glx levels in treatment of major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to explore a possible role of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate, as measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS), in the treatment outcomes of people with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Despite the prevalence of MDD and various treatment modalities, the neurobiological mechanisms of each remain poorly understood. We synthesised data from 41 longitudinal studies comprising 918 individuals with MDD, spanning four primary treatment modalities: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), ketamine, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).
Pooled analyses revealed a significant increase in Glx levels post-treatment across modalities, with this effect persisting in responder-only subgroups and analyses restricted to prefrontal regions. In contrast, no consistent changes were observed in GABA or glutamate levels following treatment. These results suggest that modulation of Glx, but not bulk GABA or glutamate, may be a common neurobiological mechanism underlying therapeutic response in MDD. However, a role for GABAergic systems cannot be excluded, as functionally relevant changes may occur without detectable shifts in overall concentration. We recommend future studies prioritise reporting by responder status and employ higher-field MRS techniques to more precisely characterise treatment-related bulk metabolite changes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
1.80%
发文量
153
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry is an international and multidisciplinary journal which aims to ensure the rapid publication of authoritative reviews and research papers dealing with experimental and clinical aspects of neuro-psychopharmacology and biological psychiatry. Issues of the journal are regularly devoted wholly in or in part to a topical subject. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry does not publish work on the actions of biological extracts unless the pharmacological active molecular substrate and/or specific receptor binding properties of the extract compounds are elucidated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信