Henry Ruhl, Felipe M Berg, Amir A Rahnemai-Azar, Salim Abboud, Agata A Exner
{"title":"泡沫强化:全氟碳气体对硬化剂泡沫稳定性的影响。","authors":"Henry Ruhl, Felipe M Berg, Amir A Rahnemai-Azar, Salim Abboud, Agata A Exner","doi":"10.1016/j.jvir.2025.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the impact of incorporating perfluorocarbons (PFCs), specifically C<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub> and C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub>, on the stability of STS-based foams.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Tessari's method was employed to generate foams. C<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub> and C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub> were compared with room air due to their known characteristic as gas vesicle stabilizers. Each trial set encompassed ratios of 1:1.5, 2, 3, and 4 mL of STS-to-gas. Foam decay (1 minus percent foam remaining in syringe) was monitored using a 4K camera over 1 hour, followed by hourly snapshots for 3 hours. All trials were repeated in triplicate. Statistical analysis was carried out via one-way ANOVA and, where appropriate, Student's T-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PFC-stabilized foams exhibited greater stability than room air-stabilized foams, with C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub> demonstrating the highest stability. Air-stabilized foams fully decayed within 30 minutes, whereas PFCs maintained over 70% foam volume for up to 45 minutes. Notably, a significant decrease in foam stability was observed in the 1:4 ratio of C<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub> between 60 to 180 minutes, a decline not seen in C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub> foams (p < 0.001). While increasing the STS-to-room air ratio diminished foam stability, it enhanced stability in PFC-stabilized foams. Specifically, the 1:4 STS-to-PFC ratio sustained approximately 15% more foam than the 1:1.5 ratio over 180 minutes, aside from the substantial decrease in C<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub> foams. These findings suggest PFCs may improve the stability of sclerosing foams.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>C<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub> and C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub> showed greater stability with STS compared to room air, and C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub> exhibited better stability over time than C<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub>.</p>","PeriodicalId":49962,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Foam Fortification: The Effect of Perfluorocarbon Gases on the Stability of Sclerosing Agent Foams.\",\"authors\":\"Henry Ruhl, Felipe M Berg, Amir A Rahnemai-Azar, Salim Abboud, Agata A Exner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvir.2025.07.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the impact of incorporating perfluorocarbons (PFCs), specifically C<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub> and C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub>, on the stability of STS-based foams.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Tessari's method was employed to generate foams. C<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub> and C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub> were compared with room air due to their known characteristic as gas vesicle stabilizers. Each trial set encompassed ratios of 1:1.5, 2, 3, and 4 mL of STS-to-gas. Foam decay (1 minus percent foam remaining in syringe) was monitored using a 4K camera over 1 hour, followed by hourly snapshots for 3 hours. All trials were repeated in triplicate. Statistical analysis was carried out via one-way ANOVA and, where appropriate, Student's T-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PFC-stabilized foams exhibited greater stability than room air-stabilized foams, with C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub> demonstrating the highest stability. Air-stabilized foams fully decayed within 30 minutes, whereas PFCs maintained over 70% foam volume for up to 45 minutes. Notably, a significant decrease in foam stability was observed in the 1:4 ratio of C<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub> between 60 to 180 minutes, a decline not seen in C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub> foams (p < 0.001). While increasing the STS-to-room air ratio diminished foam stability, it enhanced stability in PFC-stabilized foams. Specifically, the 1:4 STS-to-PFC ratio sustained approximately 15% more foam than the 1:1.5 ratio over 180 minutes, aside from the substantial decrease in C<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub> foams. These findings suggest PFCs may improve the stability of sclerosing foams.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>C<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub> and C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub> showed greater stability with STS compared to room air, and C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>10</sub> exhibited better stability over time than C<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2025.07.009\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2025.07.009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Foam Fortification: The Effect of Perfluorocarbon Gases on the Stability of Sclerosing Agent Foams.
Purpose: To evaluate the impact of incorporating perfluorocarbons (PFCs), specifically C3F8 and C4F10, on the stability of STS-based foams.
Materials and methods: Tessari's method was employed to generate foams. C3F8 and C4F10 were compared with room air due to their known characteristic as gas vesicle stabilizers. Each trial set encompassed ratios of 1:1.5, 2, 3, and 4 mL of STS-to-gas. Foam decay (1 minus percent foam remaining in syringe) was monitored using a 4K camera over 1 hour, followed by hourly snapshots for 3 hours. All trials were repeated in triplicate. Statistical analysis was carried out via one-way ANOVA and, where appropriate, Student's T-test.
Results: PFC-stabilized foams exhibited greater stability than room air-stabilized foams, with C4F10 demonstrating the highest stability. Air-stabilized foams fully decayed within 30 minutes, whereas PFCs maintained over 70% foam volume for up to 45 minutes. Notably, a significant decrease in foam stability was observed in the 1:4 ratio of C3F8 between 60 to 180 minutes, a decline not seen in C4F10 foams (p < 0.001). While increasing the STS-to-room air ratio diminished foam stability, it enhanced stability in PFC-stabilized foams. Specifically, the 1:4 STS-to-PFC ratio sustained approximately 15% more foam than the 1:1.5 ratio over 180 minutes, aside from the substantial decrease in C3F8 foams. These findings suggest PFCs may improve the stability of sclerosing foams.
Conclusion: C3F8 and C4F10 showed greater stability with STS compared to room air, and C4F10 exhibited better stability over time than C3F8.
期刊介绍:
JVIR, published continuously since 1990, is an international, monthly peer-reviewed interventional radiology journal. As the official journal of the Society of Interventional Radiology, JVIR is the peer-reviewed journal of choice for interventional radiologists, radiologists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, neurosurgeons, and other clinicians who seek current and reliable information on every aspect of vascular and interventional radiology. Each issue of JVIR covers critical and cutting-edge medical minimally invasive, clinical, basic research, radiological, pathological, and socioeconomic issues of importance to the field.