异丙酚过敏的诊断(嗜碱性粒细胞激活试验在过敏原鉴定中的创新作用):1例报告。

IF 1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Pan African Medical Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.11604/pamj.2025.50.82.46400
Chaimaa Chahine, Zakaria Zidane, Karima Mohtadi, Sanaa Souat, Khadija El Azhary, Rachid Saïle, Abdallah Badou, Mohammed Ali Debbarh, Claude Lambert, Ibtihal Benhsaien, Hanane Salih Alj
{"title":"异丙酚过敏的诊断(嗜碱性粒细胞激活试验在过敏原鉴定中的创新作用):1例报告。","authors":"Chaimaa Chahine, Zakaria Zidane, Karima Mohtadi, Sanaa Souat, Khadija El Azhary, Rachid Saïle, Abdallah Badou, Mohammed Ali Debbarh, Claude Lambert, Ibtihal Benhsaien, Hanane Salih Alj","doi":"10.11604/pamj.2025.50.82.46400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drug allergies (DA), particularly to anesthetics, are underexplored in Morocco. Traditional diagnostic methods such as skin tests and specific IgE assays are costly, risky, and often inaccessible. The basophil activation test (BAT) is emerging as a safer and more effective alternative, especially for diagnosing propofol allergy, an under-researched area. This study examines the role of the basophils activation test in diagnosing perioperative anaphylaxis to propofol. A 32-year-old woman experienced two anaphylactic reactions during fibroscopy after propofol administration. The basophil activation test (BAT) was performed one week later using diluted propofol, measuring basophil activation via CD63 and CD203c markers by flow cytometry. Results showed 0% basophil activation in the negative control, 85.7% in the positive control, and 19.05% at 1 mg/ml of propofol, with a strong correlation (0.973) between concentration and activation. The basophil activation test (BAT) offers a reliable diagnostic method, particularly in Morocco, where traditional tests are limited, providing a cost-effective solution for diverse allergens in low-resource settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48190,"journal":{"name":"Pan African Medical Journal","volume":"50 ","pages":"82"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12271875/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnosis of propofol allergy (the innovative role of the basophil activation test in the identification of allergen): a case report.\",\"authors\":\"Chaimaa Chahine, Zakaria Zidane, Karima Mohtadi, Sanaa Souat, Khadija El Azhary, Rachid Saïle, Abdallah Badou, Mohammed Ali Debbarh, Claude Lambert, Ibtihal Benhsaien, Hanane Salih Alj\",\"doi\":\"10.11604/pamj.2025.50.82.46400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Drug allergies (DA), particularly to anesthetics, are underexplored in Morocco. Traditional diagnostic methods such as skin tests and specific IgE assays are costly, risky, and often inaccessible. The basophil activation test (BAT) is emerging as a safer and more effective alternative, especially for diagnosing propofol allergy, an under-researched area. This study examines the role of the basophils activation test in diagnosing perioperative anaphylaxis to propofol. A 32-year-old woman experienced two anaphylactic reactions during fibroscopy after propofol administration. The basophil activation test (BAT) was performed one week later using diluted propofol, measuring basophil activation via CD63 and CD203c markers by flow cytometry. Results showed 0% basophil activation in the negative control, 85.7% in the positive control, and 19.05% at 1 mg/ml of propofol, with a strong correlation (0.973) between concentration and activation. The basophil activation test (BAT) offers a reliable diagnostic method, particularly in Morocco, where traditional tests are limited, providing a cost-effective solution for diverse allergens in low-resource settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pan African Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"50 \",\"pages\":\"82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12271875/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pan African Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2025.50.82.46400\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pan African Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2025.50.82.46400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

药物过敏(DA),特别是对麻醉剂的过敏,在摩洛哥尚未得到充分的研究。传统的诊断方法,如皮肤试验和特异性IgE测定,成本高、风险大,而且往往难以获得。嗜碱性粒细胞激活试验(BAT)正在成为一种更安全、更有效的替代方法,特别是在诊断异丙酚过敏方面,这是一个研究不足的领域。本研究探讨了嗜碱性细胞激活试验在诊断围手术期异丙酚过敏反应中的作用。一位32岁的女性在异丙酚注射后的纤维镜检查中出现了两次过敏反应。1周后用稀释的异丙酚进行嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验(BAT),流式细胞术通过CD63和CD203c标记物检测嗜碱性粒细胞活化情况。结果异丙酚浓度为1 mg/ml时,阴性对照的嗜碱性粒细胞活化率为0%,阳性对照为85.7%,19.05%,浓度与活化率呈正相关(0.973)。嗜碱性粒细胞激活试验(BAT)提供了一种可靠的诊断方法,特别是在传统检测方法有限的摩洛哥,在资源匮乏的环境中为多种过敏原提供了一种具有成本效益的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Diagnosis of propofol allergy (the innovative role of the basophil activation test in the identification of allergen): a case report.

Diagnosis of propofol allergy (the innovative role of the basophil activation test in the identification of allergen): a case report.

Diagnosis of propofol allergy (the innovative role of the basophil activation test in the identification of allergen): a case report.

Drug allergies (DA), particularly to anesthetics, are underexplored in Morocco. Traditional diagnostic methods such as skin tests and specific IgE assays are costly, risky, and often inaccessible. The basophil activation test (BAT) is emerging as a safer and more effective alternative, especially for diagnosing propofol allergy, an under-researched area. This study examines the role of the basophils activation test in diagnosing perioperative anaphylaxis to propofol. A 32-year-old woman experienced two anaphylactic reactions during fibroscopy after propofol administration. The basophil activation test (BAT) was performed one week later using diluted propofol, measuring basophil activation via CD63 and CD203c markers by flow cytometry. Results showed 0% basophil activation in the negative control, 85.7% in the positive control, and 19.05% at 1 mg/ml of propofol, with a strong correlation (0.973) between concentration and activation. The basophil activation test (BAT) offers a reliable diagnostic method, particularly in Morocco, where traditional tests are limited, providing a cost-effective solution for diverse allergens in low-resource settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pan African Medical Journal
Pan African Medical Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
691
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信