Evgeny Kasyanov, Yana Yakovleva, Maria Khobeysh, Ekaterina Gerasimchuk, Galina Mazo
{"title":"复发性和持续性抑郁症的终生患病率:流行病学研究的范围综述。","authors":"Evgeny Kasyanov, Yana Yakovleva, Maria Khobeysh, Ekaterina Gerasimchuk, Galina Mazo","doi":"10.2174/0117450179372815250516102324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Differing conceptualizations of recurrent and persistent depression in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and International Classification of Diseases (ICD) lead to diagnostic inconsistencies. This scoping review analyzed epidemiological studies on the lifetime prevalence of recurrent and persistent depression in the general population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we searched MEDLINE and the Russian Science Citation Index without time or language restrictions. Inclusion criteria were original epidemiological studies of the general population reporting lifetime prevalence of recurrent or persistent depression, using DSM-III/IV/5 or ICD-9/10/11 criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only three studies on recurrent depression were identified - from Switzerland, the USA, and Hungary - showing a consistent lifetime prevalence of 10.3% to 10.5%. In contrast, major depressive disorder had a lifetime prevalence of 1.5 to 2.5 times higher in these studies. Dysthymia and persistent depression showed lifetime prevalences ranging from 1.1% to 6.4% and 1.6% to 18%, respectively. Women represented about two-thirds of cases of both recurrent and persistent depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The underrepresentation of recurrent depression may stem from the DSM's dominant influence in psychiatric diagnostics. Our findings highlight the need for refined diagnostic criteria and more comprehensive epidemiological studies that separately identify recurrent and persistent depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":35447,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health","volume":"21 ","pages":"e17450179372815"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12272091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lifetime Prevalence of Recurrent and Persistent Depression: A Scoping Review of Epidemiological Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Evgeny Kasyanov, Yana Yakovleva, Maria Khobeysh, Ekaterina Gerasimchuk, Galina Mazo\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0117450179372815250516102324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Differing conceptualizations of recurrent and persistent depression in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and International Classification of Diseases (ICD) lead to diagnostic inconsistencies. This scoping review analyzed epidemiological studies on the lifetime prevalence of recurrent and persistent depression in the general population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we searched MEDLINE and the Russian Science Citation Index without time or language restrictions. Inclusion criteria were original epidemiological studies of the general population reporting lifetime prevalence of recurrent or persistent depression, using DSM-III/IV/5 or ICD-9/10/11 criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only three studies on recurrent depression were identified - from Switzerland, the USA, and Hungary - showing a consistent lifetime prevalence of 10.3% to 10.5%. In contrast, major depressive disorder had a lifetime prevalence of 1.5 to 2.5 times higher in these studies. Dysthymia and persistent depression showed lifetime prevalences ranging from 1.1% to 6.4% and 1.6% to 18%, respectively. Women represented about two-thirds of cases of both recurrent and persistent depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The underrepresentation of recurrent depression may stem from the DSM's dominant influence in psychiatric diagnostics. Our findings highlight the need for refined diagnostic criteria and more comprehensive epidemiological studies that separately identify recurrent and persistent depression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"e17450179372815\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12272091/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0117450179372815250516102324\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0117450179372815250516102324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lifetime Prevalence of Recurrent and Persistent Depression: A Scoping Review of Epidemiological Studies.
Background: Differing conceptualizations of recurrent and persistent depression in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and International Classification of Diseases (ICD) lead to diagnostic inconsistencies. This scoping review analyzed epidemiological studies on the lifetime prevalence of recurrent and persistent depression in the general population.
Methods: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we searched MEDLINE and the Russian Science Citation Index without time or language restrictions. Inclusion criteria were original epidemiological studies of the general population reporting lifetime prevalence of recurrent or persistent depression, using DSM-III/IV/5 or ICD-9/10/11 criteria.
Results: Only three studies on recurrent depression were identified - from Switzerland, the USA, and Hungary - showing a consistent lifetime prevalence of 10.3% to 10.5%. In contrast, major depressive disorder had a lifetime prevalence of 1.5 to 2.5 times higher in these studies. Dysthymia and persistent depression showed lifetime prevalences ranging from 1.1% to 6.4% and 1.6% to 18%, respectively. Women represented about two-thirds of cases of both recurrent and persistent depression.
Conclusion: The underrepresentation of recurrent depression may stem from the DSM's dominant influence in psychiatric diagnostics. Our findings highlight the need for refined diagnostic criteria and more comprehensive epidemiological studies that separately identify recurrent and persistent depression.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health is an open access online journal, which publishes Research articles, Reviews, Letters in all areas of clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health covering the following topics: Clinical and epidemiological research in psychiatry and mental health; diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of mental health conditions; and frequencies and determinants of mental health conditions in the community and the populations at risk; research and economic aspects of psychiatry, with special attention given to manuscripts presenting new results and methods in the area; and clinical epidemiologic investigation of pharmaceutical agents. Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health, a peer reviewed journal, aims to provide the most complete and reliable source of information on current developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality articles rapidly and freely available worldwide.