兽医皮肤科会诊期间,会诊前客户填写病史问卷回答与口头病史的一致性。

IF 1.4 3区 农林科学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Jyothi Surendran, Andrew Rosenberg, Craig Griffin
{"title":"兽医皮肤科会诊期间,会诊前客户填写病史问卷回答与口头病史的一致性。","authors":"Jyothi Surendran, Andrew Rosenberg, Craig Griffin","doi":"10.1111/vde.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pre-consultation client-completed history questionnaires are used in veterinary dermatology to improve consultation efficiency. The agreement between such a questionnaire and verbal history has not been evaluated.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the level of agreement between responses on a pre-consultation client-completed history questionnaire and the verbal history obtained by multiple clinicians during an initial veterinary dermatology consultation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted, enrolling 130 canine cases by 7 clinicians from 4 different veterinary dermatology specialty clinics. A 16-question online questionnaire was completed by the client. Agreement between the client-completed questionnaire responses and verbal history regarding the same questions obtained by the clinician was determined using a 95% confidence interval. A nonvalidated scoring system categorised agreement as excellent (≥ 90% agreement) and nonexcellent (< 90% agreement). Agreement between clinicians for all questions was calculated using chi-square tests or, if any expected cell counts were < 5, a Fisher's exact test. A significance level of p < 0.05 was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One of the 16 questions showed excellent and the remaining questions non-excellent agreement. There was significant variation in agreement between clinicians for all questions (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical relevance: </strong>This study revealed varying levels of agreement between questionnaire responses and verbal histories. Multiple questions on the questionnaire may require modification, with most or all requiring further verification during the verbal history. Although questionnaires are useful, they cannot replace thorough verbal history-taking. The observed interclinician variability suggests that clinicians are likely to influence the accuracy and utility of pre-consultation questionnaires.</p>","PeriodicalId":23599,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agreement Between Pre-Consultation Client Filled History Questionnaire Responses and Verbal History During a Veterinary Dermatology Consultation.\",\"authors\":\"Jyothi Surendran, Andrew Rosenberg, Craig Griffin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vde.70004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pre-consultation client-completed history questionnaires are used in veterinary dermatology to improve consultation efficiency. The agreement between such a questionnaire and verbal history has not been evaluated.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the level of agreement between responses on a pre-consultation client-completed history questionnaire and the verbal history obtained by multiple clinicians during an initial veterinary dermatology consultation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted, enrolling 130 canine cases by 7 clinicians from 4 different veterinary dermatology specialty clinics. A 16-question online questionnaire was completed by the client. Agreement between the client-completed questionnaire responses and verbal history regarding the same questions obtained by the clinician was determined using a 95% confidence interval. A nonvalidated scoring system categorised agreement as excellent (≥ 90% agreement) and nonexcellent (< 90% agreement). Agreement between clinicians for all questions was calculated using chi-square tests or, if any expected cell counts were < 5, a Fisher's exact test. A significance level of p < 0.05 was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One of the 16 questions showed excellent and the remaining questions non-excellent agreement. There was significant variation in agreement between clinicians for all questions (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical relevance: </strong>This study revealed varying levels of agreement between questionnaire responses and verbal histories. Multiple questions on the questionnaire may require modification, with most or all requiring further verification during the verbal history. Although questionnaires are useful, they cannot replace thorough verbal history-taking. The observed interclinician variability suggests that clinicians are likely to influence the accuracy and utility of pre-consultation questionnaires.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary dermatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/vde.70004\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vde.70004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:兽医皮肤科采用会诊前患者填写病史问卷,以提高会诊效率。这种问卷调查与口述病史之间的一致性尚未得到评估。目的:评估会诊前客户填写的病史问卷的回答与兽医皮肤科首次会诊期间多名临床医生获得的口头病史之间的一致程度。材料与方法:采用横断面研究方法,由7名临床医生从4个不同的兽医皮肤科专科门诊纳入130例犬。客户完成了一份包含16个问题的在线问卷。在临床医生获得的相同问题上,客户填写的问卷回答与口头病史之间的一致性使用95%置信区间确定。一个未经验证的评分系统将一致性分为优秀(一致性≥90%)和非优秀(结果:16个问题中有一个问题为优秀,其余问题为非优秀)。临床医生对所有问题的一致意见存在显著差异(p结论和临床相关性:本研究揭示了问卷回答和口头病史之间的不同程度的一致意见。问卷上的多个问题可能需要修改,其中大部分或全部需要在口头病史中进一步验证。虽然问卷调查是有用的,但它们不能取代彻底的口头历史记录。观察到的临床医生之间的差异表明,临床医生可能会影响会诊前问卷的准确性和实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Agreement Between Pre-Consultation Client Filled History Questionnaire Responses and Verbal History During a Veterinary Dermatology Consultation.

Background: Pre-consultation client-completed history questionnaires are used in veterinary dermatology to improve consultation efficiency. The agreement between such a questionnaire and verbal history has not been evaluated.

Objectives: To evaluate the level of agreement between responses on a pre-consultation client-completed history questionnaire and the verbal history obtained by multiple clinicians during an initial veterinary dermatology consultation.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted, enrolling 130 canine cases by 7 clinicians from 4 different veterinary dermatology specialty clinics. A 16-question online questionnaire was completed by the client. Agreement between the client-completed questionnaire responses and verbal history regarding the same questions obtained by the clinician was determined using a 95% confidence interval. A nonvalidated scoring system categorised agreement as excellent (≥ 90% agreement) and nonexcellent (< 90% agreement). Agreement between clinicians for all questions was calculated using chi-square tests or, if any expected cell counts were < 5, a Fisher's exact test. A significance level of p < 0.05 was used.

Results: One of the 16 questions showed excellent and the remaining questions non-excellent agreement. There was significant variation in agreement between clinicians for all questions (p < 0.001).

Conclusions and clinical relevance: This study revealed varying levels of agreement between questionnaire responses and verbal histories. Multiple questions on the questionnaire may require modification, with most or all requiring further verification during the verbal history. Although questionnaires are useful, they cannot replace thorough verbal history-taking. The observed interclinician variability suggests that clinicians are likely to influence the accuracy and utility of pre-consultation questionnaires.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary dermatology
Veterinary dermatology 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
21.40%
发文量
92
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Dermatology is a bi-monthly, peer-reviewed, international journal which publishes papers on all aspects of the skin of mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians and fish. Scientific research papers, clinical case reports and reviews covering the following aspects of dermatology will be considered for publication: -Skin structure (anatomy, histology, ultrastructure) -Skin function (physiology, biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, genetics) -Skin microbiology and parasitology -Dermatopathology -Pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of skin diseases -New disease entities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信