Janus激酶抑制剂治疗局限性硬皮病:系统文献综述。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2025-06-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.55730/1300-0144.6000
Seher Şener, Yusuf Ziya Şener, Ezgi Deniz Batu, Alper Sari, Ali Akdoğan
{"title":"Janus激酶抑制剂治疗局限性硬皮病:系统文献综述。","authors":"Seher Şener, Yusuf Ziya Şener, Ezgi Deniz Batu, Alper Sari, Ali Akdoğan","doi":"10.55730/1300-0144.6000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Reports on the use of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in the treatment of localized scleroderma are increasing in the literature. In this review, we examined the published studies regarding the use of JAK inhibitors in patients with localized scleroderma.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE and Scopus for articles on patients with localized scleroderma treated with JAK inhibitors. The search included articles from the inception of these databases through August 1<sup>st</sup>, 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our literature search showed 11 articles describing 17 patients with localized scleroderma treated with JAK inhibitors. Generalized morphea (47.1%) was the most common type of localized scleroderma in patients treated with JAK inhibitors. The most frequently used JAK inhibitor was tofacitinib (64.7%). In some cases, baricitinib (17.6%) and ruxolitinib (17.6%) were also preferred. All JAK inhibitors were mainly preferred for the treatment of resistant/progressive skin disease in these patients (60.7%). The improvement rate associated with JAK inhibitors was 88.2%. Relapse occurred in 33.3% of patients treated with JAK inhibitors. Side effects were reported in 18.2% of patients: one patient was diagnosed to have diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 1) while on tofacitinib.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>JAK inhibitors could be considered as a therapeutic option, especially in patients with refractory localized scleroderma, but more extensive clinical trials are needed to clarify questions regarding their efficacy and safety data.</p>","PeriodicalId":23361,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"55 3","pages":"533-539"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12270291/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Janus kinase inhibitors in localized scleroderma: a systematic literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Seher Şener, Yusuf Ziya Şener, Ezgi Deniz Batu, Alper Sari, Ali Akdoğan\",\"doi\":\"10.55730/1300-0144.6000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Reports on the use of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in the treatment of localized scleroderma are increasing in the literature. In this review, we examined the published studies regarding the use of JAK inhibitors in patients with localized scleroderma.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE and Scopus for articles on patients with localized scleroderma treated with JAK inhibitors. The search included articles from the inception of these databases through August 1<sup>st</sup>, 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our literature search showed 11 articles describing 17 patients with localized scleroderma treated with JAK inhibitors. Generalized morphea (47.1%) was the most common type of localized scleroderma in patients treated with JAK inhibitors. The most frequently used JAK inhibitor was tofacitinib (64.7%). In some cases, baricitinib (17.6%) and ruxolitinib (17.6%) were also preferred. All JAK inhibitors were mainly preferred for the treatment of resistant/progressive skin disease in these patients (60.7%). The improvement rate associated with JAK inhibitors was 88.2%. Relapse occurred in 33.3% of patients treated with JAK inhibitors. Side effects were reported in 18.2% of patients: one patient was diagnosed to have diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 1) while on tofacitinib.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>JAK inhibitors could be considered as a therapeutic option, especially in patients with refractory localized scleroderma, but more extensive clinical trials are needed to clarify questions regarding their efficacy and safety data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"55 3\",\"pages\":\"533-539\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12270291/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.6000\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.6000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:文献中使用Janus激酶(JAK)抑制剂治疗局限性硬皮病的报道越来越多。在这篇综述中,我们检查了已发表的关于在局限性硬皮病患者中使用JAK抑制剂的研究。材料和方法:我们检索MEDLINE和Scopus中有关JAK抑制剂治疗局限性硬皮病患者的文章。搜索包括从这些数据库建立之初到2024年8月1日的文章。结果:我们检索了11篇文章,描述了17例用JAK抑制剂治疗的局限性硬皮病患者。在接受JAK抑制剂治疗的患者中,全面性睡眠(47.1%)是最常见的局限性硬皮病类型。最常用的JAK抑制剂是托法替尼(64.7%)。在某些情况下,巴西替尼(17.6%)和鲁索利替尼(17.6%)也是首选。在这些患者中,所有JAK抑制剂主要首选用于治疗耐药/进展性皮肤病(60.7%)。与JAK抑制剂相关的改善率为88.2%。接受JAK抑制剂治疗的患者中有33.3%出现复发。18.2%的患者报告了副作用:1例患者在使用托法替尼时被诊断为弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(n = 1)。结论:JAK抑制剂可以被视为一种治疗选择,特别是对于难治性局限性硬皮病患者,但需要更广泛的临床试验来阐明其有效性和安全性数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Janus kinase inhibitors in localized scleroderma: a systematic literature review.

Janus kinase inhibitors in localized scleroderma: a systematic literature review.

Janus kinase inhibitors in localized scleroderma: a systematic literature review.

Background/aim: Reports on the use of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in the treatment of localized scleroderma are increasing in the literature. In this review, we examined the published studies regarding the use of JAK inhibitors in patients with localized scleroderma.

Materials and methods: We searched MEDLINE and Scopus for articles on patients with localized scleroderma treated with JAK inhibitors. The search included articles from the inception of these databases through August 1st, 2024.

Results: Our literature search showed 11 articles describing 17 patients with localized scleroderma treated with JAK inhibitors. Generalized morphea (47.1%) was the most common type of localized scleroderma in patients treated with JAK inhibitors. The most frequently used JAK inhibitor was tofacitinib (64.7%). In some cases, baricitinib (17.6%) and ruxolitinib (17.6%) were also preferred. All JAK inhibitors were mainly preferred for the treatment of resistant/progressive skin disease in these patients (60.7%). The improvement rate associated with JAK inhibitors was 88.2%. Relapse occurred in 33.3% of patients treated with JAK inhibitors. Side effects were reported in 18.2% of patients: one patient was diagnosed to have diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 1) while on tofacitinib.

Conclusion: JAK inhibitors could be considered as a therapeutic option, especially in patients with refractory localized scleroderma, but more extensive clinical trials are needed to clarify questions regarding their efficacy and safety data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Turkish Journal of Medical sciences is a peer-reviewed comprehensive resource that provides critical up-to-date information on the broad spectrum of general medical sciences. The Journal intended to publish original medical scientific papers regarding the priority based on the prominence, significance, and timeliness of the findings. However since the audience of the Journal is not limited to any subspeciality in a wide variety of medical disciplines, the papers focusing on the technical  details of a given medical  subspeciality may not be evaluated for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信