下肢感觉神经动作电位振幅比对远端糖尿病多发神经病有诊断价值吗?

IF 1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2025-04-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.55730/1300-0144.6014
Işıl Yazici Gençdal, Nermin Görkem Şirin, İrem Ilgezdi, Ümmü Mutlu, Elif Kocasoy-Orhan, Mehmet Barış Baslo, Nevin Dinççağ, Ali Emre Öge
{"title":"下肢感觉神经动作电位振幅比对远端糖尿病多发神经病有诊断价值吗?","authors":"Işıl Yazici Gençdal, Nermin Görkem Şirin, İrem Ilgezdi, Ümmü Mutlu, Elif Kocasoy-Orhan, Mehmet Barış Baslo, Nevin Dinççağ, Ali Emre Öge","doi":"10.55730/1300-0144.6014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>To investigate the diagnostic sensitivity of sural sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) to medial femoral cutaneous nerve and dorsal sural to sural SNAP amplitude ratios in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sural/radial (SRAR), sural/medial femoral cutaneous (SMFAR), and dorsal sural/sural (DSSAR) SNAP amplitude ratios were calculated in 22 controls and 46 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Combined sensory scores (superficial peroneal, sural, dorsal sural, and medial plantar SNAPs), and amplitude ratio scores (SRAR, DSSAR, and SMFAR) were assessed. The parameters were compared statistically between the patient and control groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All SNAP amplitudes were significantly lower in patients as compared with those of the controls. Reduced medial plantar SNAP amplitude was the most frequent abnormality in the patient group. DSSAR and SMFAR, but not SRAR were found to have significant value in differentiating patients from controls with low sensitivity and moderate specificity. The combined sensory score improved the diagnostic accuracy for diabetic polyneuropathy, while the other combined scores add no additional value in this respect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Distal nerve conduction studies (NCSs) are most useful in diagnosing mild diabetic polyneuropathy. Although DSSAR and SMFAR can be moderately sensitive alternatives, particularly when used in combined scores, these ratios do not add any diagnostic value in patients with axonal polyneuropathies of similar severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":23361,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"55 3","pages":"666-675"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12270288/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do the amplitude ratios of sensory nerve action potentials in the lower extremities have any diagnostic utility in distal diabetic polyneuropathy?\",\"authors\":\"Işıl Yazici Gençdal, Nermin Görkem Şirin, İrem Ilgezdi, Ümmü Mutlu, Elif Kocasoy-Orhan, Mehmet Barış Baslo, Nevin Dinççağ, Ali Emre Öge\",\"doi\":\"10.55730/1300-0144.6014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>To investigate the diagnostic sensitivity of sural sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) to medial femoral cutaneous nerve and dorsal sural to sural SNAP amplitude ratios in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sural/radial (SRAR), sural/medial femoral cutaneous (SMFAR), and dorsal sural/sural (DSSAR) SNAP amplitude ratios were calculated in 22 controls and 46 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Combined sensory scores (superficial peroneal, sural, dorsal sural, and medial plantar SNAPs), and amplitude ratio scores (SRAR, DSSAR, and SMFAR) were assessed. The parameters were compared statistically between the patient and control groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All SNAP amplitudes were significantly lower in patients as compared with those of the controls. Reduced medial plantar SNAP amplitude was the most frequent abnormality in the patient group. DSSAR and SMFAR, but not SRAR were found to have significant value in differentiating patients from controls with low sensitivity and moderate specificity. The combined sensory score improved the diagnostic accuracy for diabetic polyneuropathy, while the other combined scores add no additional value in this respect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Distal nerve conduction studies (NCSs) are most useful in diagnosing mild diabetic polyneuropathy. Although DSSAR and SMFAR can be moderately sensitive alternatives, particularly when used in combined scores, these ratios do not add any diagnostic value in patients with axonal polyneuropathies of similar severity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"55 3\",\"pages\":\"666-675\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12270288/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.6014\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.6014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:探讨腓肠感觉神经动作电位(SNAP)对股内侧皮神经的敏感性及腓肠背侧与腓肠SNAP振幅比对糖尿病多发神经病的诊断价值。材料和方法:计算22例对照组和46例2型糖尿病患者腓肠/桡动脉(SRAR)、腓肠/股内侧皮动脉(SMFAR)和腓肠背侧/腓肠(DSSAR) SNAP振幅比。综合感觉评分(腓浅、腓肠、腓肠背和足底内侧snap)和幅度比评分(SRAR、DSSAR和SMFAR)进行评估。对患者与对照组的各项指标进行统计学比较。结果:与对照组相比,患者所有SNAP振幅均显著降低。内侧足底SNAP振幅降低是患者组中最常见的异常。发现DSSAR和SMFAR,而非SRAR在区分患者与对照组方面具有显著价值,敏感性低,特异性中等。综合感觉评分提高了糖尿病多发神经病变的诊断准确性,而其他综合评分在这方面没有增加额外的价值。结论:远端神经传导检查(NCSs)对轻度糖尿病多发神经病的诊断最有价值。虽然DSSAR和SMFAR可以作为中等敏感的替代方案,特别是在联合评分时,这些比率对类似严重程度的轴突多发性神经病变患者没有任何诊断价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do the amplitude ratios of sensory nerve action potentials in the lower extremities have any diagnostic utility in distal diabetic polyneuropathy?

Background/aim: To investigate the diagnostic sensitivity of sural sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) to medial femoral cutaneous nerve and dorsal sural to sural SNAP amplitude ratios in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy.

Materials and methods: Sural/radial (SRAR), sural/medial femoral cutaneous (SMFAR), and dorsal sural/sural (DSSAR) SNAP amplitude ratios were calculated in 22 controls and 46 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Combined sensory scores (superficial peroneal, sural, dorsal sural, and medial plantar SNAPs), and amplitude ratio scores (SRAR, DSSAR, and SMFAR) were assessed. The parameters were compared statistically between the patient and control groups.

Results: All SNAP amplitudes were significantly lower in patients as compared with those of the controls. Reduced medial plantar SNAP amplitude was the most frequent abnormality in the patient group. DSSAR and SMFAR, but not SRAR were found to have significant value in differentiating patients from controls with low sensitivity and moderate specificity. The combined sensory score improved the diagnostic accuracy for diabetic polyneuropathy, while the other combined scores add no additional value in this respect.

Conclusion: Distal nerve conduction studies (NCSs) are most useful in diagnosing mild diabetic polyneuropathy. Although DSSAR and SMFAR can be moderately sensitive alternatives, particularly when used in combined scores, these ratios do not add any diagnostic value in patients with axonal polyneuropathies of similar severity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Turkish Journal of Medical sciences is a peer-reviewed comprehensive resource that provides critical up-to-date information on the broad spectrum of general medical sciences. The Journal intended to publish original medical scientific papers regarding the priority based on the prominence, significance, and timeliness of the findings. However since the audience of the Journal is not limited to any subspeciality in a wide variety of medical disciplines, the papers focusing on the technical  details of a given medical  subspeciality may not be evaluated for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信