Philipp Linde, Frauke Lang, Christiane Matuschek, Marsha Schlenter, Davide Scafa, Judith Neuwahl, Matthias Mäurer, Michael Oertel, Hendrik Dapper, Emmanouil Fokas, Marie Klein, Christian Baues
{"title":"评估四所德国医学院放射肿瘤学教育的质量:学生视角和与DEGRO建议的比较","authors":"Philipp Linde, Frauke Lang, Christiane Matuschek, Marsha Schlenter, Davide Scafa, Judith Neuwahl, Matthias Mäurer, Michael Oertel, Hendrik Dapper, Emmanouil Fokas, Marie Klein, Christian Baues","doi":"10.1007/s00066-025-02442-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The increasing importance of radiation oncology (RO) education worldwide drives a need for modernization of university curricula, particularly in anticipation of the new Licensing Regulation for Physicians (Ärztliche Approbationsordnung, ÄApprO) in Germany. This study evaluates RO education at four German medical schools and compares student perspectives with the recommendations of the academic radiation oncology consortium of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie, DEGRO) in order to highlight gaps and opportunities for curriculum improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among medical students from the universities in Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf (ABCD) from January to June 2022. The standardized digital questionnaire included 31 questions (Likert scale and open-ended items) assessing teaching quality, learning formats, and practical relevance. Descriptive and thematic analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 152 fully completed surveys were analyzed. Most students (76%) reported the use of clinical case examples, but only 13% had direct patient contact. Small-group teaching and hybrid learning formats were preferred. ABCD students emphasized the need for clearer learning objectives and improved differentiation of RO from related disciplines. While 50% supported increased semester hours, opinions were divided. Findings were largely consistent with DEGRO's recommendations, though discrepancies were observed in the organization of RO within medical curricula.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified key areas for improving RO education, including clearer learning objectives, more interactive and clinically relevant teaching, and increased opportunities for hands-on experience. Integrating these student-informed recommendations into future curriculum reforms may enhance training quality, promote engagement, and support interest in RO as a career.</p>","PeriodicalId":21998,"journal":{"name":"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the quality of radiation oncology education in four German medical schools: a student perspective and comparison with DEGRO recommendations.\",\"authors\":\"Philipp Linde, Frauke Lang, Christiane Matuschek, Marsha Schlenter, Davide Scafa, Judith Neuwahl, Matthias Mäurer, Michael Oertel, Hendrik Dapper, Emmanouil Fokas, Marie Klein, Christian Baues\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00066-025-02442-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The increasing importance of radiation oncology (RO) education worldwide drives a need for modernization of university curricula, particularly in anticipation of the new Licensing Regulation for Physicians (Ärztliche Approbationsordnung, ÄApprO) in Germany. This study evaluates RO education at four German medical schools and compares student perspectives with the recommendations of the academic radiation oncology consortium of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie, DEGRO) in order to highlight gaps and opportunities for curriculum improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among medical students from the universities in Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf (ABCD) from January to June 2022. The standardized digital questionnaire included 31 questions (Likert scale and open-ended items) assessing teaching quality, learning formats, and practical relevance. Descriptive and thematic analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 152 fully completed surveys were analyzed. Most students (76%) reported the use of clinical case examples, but only 13% had direct patient contact. Small-group teaching and hybrid learning formats were preferred. ABCD students emphasized the need for clearer learning objectives and improved differentiation of RO from related disciplines. While 50% supported increased semester hours, opinions were divided. Findings were largely consistent with DEGRO's recommendations, though discrepancies were observed in the organization of RO within medical curricula.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified key areas for improving RO education, including clearer learning objectives, more interactive and clinically relevant teaching, and increased opportunities for hands-on experience. Integrating these student-informed recommendations into future curriculum reforms may enhance training quality, promote engagement, and support interest in RO as a career.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-025-02442-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-025-02442-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:世界范围内放射肿瘤学(RO)教育的重要性日益增加,推动了大学课程现代化的需要,特别是在德国新的医师许可条例(Ärztliche Approbationsordnung, ÄApprO)的预期中。本研究评估了四所德国医学院的放射肿瘤学教育,并将学生的观点与德国放射肿瘤学学会(Deutsche Gesellschaft fr Radioonkologie, DEGRO)放射肿瘤学学术联盟的建议进行了比较,以突出课程改进的差距和机会。方法:对2022年1 - 6月来自亚琛、波恩、科隆和塞尔多夫(ABCD)大学的医学生进行横断面调查。标准化的数字问卷包括31个问题(李克特量表和开放式项目),评估教学质量、学习形式和实际相关性。进行了描述性和专题分析。结果:共分析了152份完整完成的调查。大多数学生(76%)报告使用临床病例示例,但只有13%与患者直接接触。首选小组教学和混合学习形式。ABCD学生强调需要更明确的学习目标,并加强RO与相关学科的区分。虽然50%的人支持增加学时,但意见分歧。调查结果与DEGRO的建议基本一致,尽管在医学课程中组织RO方面存在差异。结论:本研究确定了改进RO教育的关键领域,包括更明确的学习目标,更多互动和临床相关的教学,以及增加实践经验的机会。将这些学生的建议整合到未来的课程改革中,可以提高培训质量,促进参与,并支持将RO作为职业的兴趣。
Assessing the quality of radiation oncology education in four German medical schools: a student perspective and comparison with DEGRO recommendations.
Purpose: The increasing importance of radiation oncology (RO) education worldwide drives a need for modernization of university curricula, particularly in anticipation of the new Licensing Regulation for Physicians (Ärztliche Approbationsordnung, ÄApprO) in Germany. This study evaluates RO education at four German medical schools and compares student perspectives with the recommendations of the academic radiation oncology consortium of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie, DEGRO) in order to highlight gaps and opportunities for curriculum improvement.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among medical students from the universities in Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf (ABCD) from January to June 2022. The standardized digital questionnaire included 31 questions (Likert scale and open-ended items) assessing teaching quality, learning formats, and practical relevance. Descriptive and thematic analyses were performed.
Results: A total of 152 fully completed surveys were analyzed. Most students (76%) reported the use of clinical case examples, but only 13% had direct patient contact. Small-group teaching and hybrid learning formats were preferred. ABCD students emphasized the need for clearer learning objectives and improved differentiation of RO from related disciplines. While 50% supported increased semester hours, opinions were divided. Findings were largely consistent with DEGRO's recommendations, though discrepancies were observed in the organization of RO within medical curricula.
Conclusion: This study identified key areas for improving RO education, including clearer learning objectives, more interactive and clinically relevant teaching, and increased opportunities for hands-on experience. Integrating these student-informed recommendations into future curriculum reforms may enhance training quality, promote engagement, and support interest in RO as a career.
期刊介绍:
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, published monthly, is a scientific journal that covers all aspects of oncology with focus on radiooncology, radiation biology and radiation physics. The articles are not only of interest to radiooncologists but to all physicians interested in oncology, to radiation biologists and radiation physicists. The journal publishes original articles, review articles and case studies that are peer-reviewed. It includes scientific short communications as well as a literature review with annotated articles that inform the reader on new developments in the various disciplines concerned and hence allow for a sound overview on the latest results in radiooncology research.
Founded in 1912, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie is the oldest oncological journal in the world. Today, contributions are published in English and German. All articles have English summaries and legends. The journal is the official publication of several scientific radiooncological societies and publishes the relevant communications of these societies.