Zafer Akman, Gilles Boire, Nathalie Carrier, Sophie Roux, Ariel Masetto, Artur J de Brum-Fernandes, Patrick Liang, Hugues Allard-Chamard
{"title":"在新近发病的类风湿性关节炎的纵向队列中,对健康伤害和问题的应对问卷的验证。","authors":"Zafer Akman, Gilles Boire, Nathalie Carrier, Sophie Roux, Ariel Masetto, Artur J de Brum-Fernandes, Patrick Liang, Hugues Allard-Chamard","doi":"10.1093/rap/rkaf057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate the Coping with Health Injuries and Problems (CHIP) questionnaire in a prospective cohort of early RA patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2006 and 2022, newly diagnosed RA patients self-administered CHIP at baseline and at follow-up visits. The original CHIP comprises four subscales (Distraction, Palliative, Instrumental, Emotional preoccupation), each containing eight items (scores 8 to 40). At inclusion and again after more than 2 years of follow-up, internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach's alpha, factor structure with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA, CFA), and sensitivity to change with mixed linear models with repeated measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 381 early RA patients, the means (SD) were 23.75 (6.52) for Distraction, 23.55 (6.11) for Palliative, 31.38 (5.41) for Instrumental and 25.11 (7.89) for Emotional preoccupation, values comparable to the literature only available in back pain patients. In 253 of the 381 patients followed up into established RA, all subscales except Distraction had decreased significantly between inclusion and follow-up. Internal consistency was similar in established and early RA (Cronbach's alphas: 0.77 to 0.89 <i>vs</i> 0.75 to 0.86, respectively). EFA in early and established RA suggested that three items linked to treatment adherence consistently segregated from other Instrumental items as a subscale, although this did not improve internal consistency and CFA significantly.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The original CHIP possesses good psychometric properties to describe individual coping styles in both early and established RA. Coping in RA might be better characterized using five rather than four subscales, with the additional subscale addressing treatment adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":21350,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","volume":"9 3","pages":"rkaf057"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12274643/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Coping with Health Injuries and Problems questionnaire in a longitudinal cohort with recent-onset RA.\",\"authors\":\"Zafer Akman, Gilles Boire, Nathalie Carrier, Sophie Roux, Ariel Masetto, Artur J de Brum-Fernandes, Patrick Liang, Hugues Allard-Chamard\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/rap/rkaf057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate the Coping with Health Injuries and Problems (CHIP) questionnaire in a prospective cohort of early RA patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2006 and 2022, newly diagnosed RA patients self-administered CHIP at baseline and at follow-up visits. The original CHIP comprises four subscales (Distraction, Palliative, Instrumental, Emotional preoccupation), each containing eight items (scores 8 to 40). At inclusion and again after more than 2 years of follow-up, internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach's alpha, factor structure with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA, CFA), and sensitivity to change with mixed linear models with repeated measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 381 early RA patients, the means (SD) were 23.75 (6.52) for Distraction, 23.55 (6.11) for Palliative, 31.38 (5.41) for Instrumental and 25.11 (7.89) for Emotional preoccupation, values comparable to the literature only available in back pain patients. In 253 of the 381 patients followed up into established RA, all subscales except Distraction had decreased significantly between inclusion and follow-up. Internal consistency was similar in established and early RA (Cronbach's alphas: 0.77 to 0.89 <i>vs</i> 0.75 to 0.86, respectively). EFA in early and established RA suggested that three items linked to treatment adherence consistently segregated from other Instrumental items as a subscale, although this did not improve internal consistency and CFA significantly.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The original CHIP possesses good psychometric properties to describe individual coping styles in both early and established RA. Coping in RA might be better characterized using five rather than four subscales, with the additional subscale addressing treatment adherence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology Advances in Practice\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"rkaf057\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12274643/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology Advances in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkaf057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkaf057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:在前瞻性RA患者队列中验证健康伤害与问题应对(CHIP)问卷。方法:2006年至2022年间,新诊断的RA患者在基线和随访时自行服用CHIP。最初的CHIP包括四个子量表(分心,姑息,工具性,情绪专注),每个包含8个项目(得分8到40)。在纳入时和随访2年以上后,采用Cronbach's alpha评估内部一致性,采用探索性和验证性因素分析(EFA, CFA)评估因素结构,并采用重复测量的混合线性模型评估变化敏感性。结果:在381例早期RA患者中,分散治疗的SD均值为23.75(6.52),姑息治疗的SD均值为23.55(6.11),工具性治疗的SD均值为31.38(5.41),情绪性治疗的SD均值为25.11(7.89),这些数据仅与背痛患者的文献相当。在381名患者中,有253名患者随访至确诊RA,除分心外,所有亚量表在纳入和随访期间均显著下降。内部一致性在已建立RA和早期RA中相似(Cronbach's alpha分别为0.77 - 0.89 vs 0.75 - 0.86)。早期和建立的RA的EFA表明,与治疗依从性相关的三个项目始终与其他工具项目分开作为子量表,尽管这并没有显著提高内部一致性和CFA。结论:原始CHIP量表具有较好的心理测量性质,可用于描述早期和晚期RA患者的个体应对方式。使用5个而不是4个分量表可能更好地表征RA的应对,其中额外的分量表涉及治疗依从性。
Validation of the Coping with Health Injuries and Problems questionnaire in a longitudinal cohort with recent-onset RA.
Objective: To validate the Coping with Health Injuries and Problems (CHIP) questionnaire in a prospective cohort of early RA patients.
Methods: Between 2006 and 2022, newly diagnosed RA patients self-administered CHIP at baseline and at follow-up visits. The original CHIP comprises four subscales (Distraction, Palliative, Instrumental, Emotional preoccupation), each containing eight items (scores 8 to 40). At inclusion and again after more than 2 years of follow-up, internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach's alpha, factor structure with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA, CFA), and sensitivity to change with mixed linear models with repeated measures.
Results: In 381 early RA patients, the means (SD) were 23.75 (6.52) for Distraction, 23.55 (6.11) for Palliative, 31.38 (5.41) for Instrumental and 25.11 (7.89) for Emotional preoccupation, values comparable to the literature only available in back pain patients. In 253 of the 381 patients followed up into established RA, all subscales except Distraction had decreased significantly between inclusion and follow-up. Internal consistency was similar in established and early RA (Cronbach's alphas: 0.77 to 0.89 vs 0.75 to 0.86, respectively). EFA in early and established RA suggested that three items linked to treatment adherence consistently segregated from other Instrumental items as a subscale, although this did not improve internal consistency and CFA significantly.
Conclusion: The original CHIP possesses good psychometric properties to describe individual coping styles in both early and established RA. Coping in RA might be better characterized using five rather than four subscales, with the additional subscale addressing treatment adherence.