关节镜下Latarjet:从开放到全关节镜下的过渡。

IF 2.1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedic Reviews Pub Date : 2025-07-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.52965/001c.133984
Mary K Skalitzky, Christopher T Eberlin, Terry L Hayes, Brendan M Patterson, James V Nepola, Joseph W Galvin, Pascal Boileau
{"title":"关节镜下Latarjet:从开放到全关节镜下的过渡。","authors":"Mary K Skalitzky, Christopher T Eberlin, Terry L Hayes, Brendan M Patterson, James V Nepola, Joseph W Galvin, Pascal Boileau","doi":"10.52965/001c.133984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Latarjet technique is the gold standard for treatment of anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss or hyperlaxity. Since its initial description by Latarjet in 1954, the procedure has undergone significant evolution. While existing literature describes each of the various advances and alterations in technique, there is no existing literature that describes the complete history of the Latarjet procedure.</p><p><strong>Questions/purposes: </strong>The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive review of the evolution of the Latarjet procedure, while highlighting the underlying biomechanical principles of the technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was performed as a systematic review of literature aimed at characterizing the history and rationale of the open Latarjet procedure as well as its initial outcomes and its subsequent evolution of technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Long-term studies of the open Latarjet procedure have consistently demonstrated low rates of recurrent instability, high patient satisfaction, and high rates of return to sport. Though a reliable procedure, complication rates have been reported between 7-35%. The arthroscopic Latarjet was first described in 2007 and combined the benefits of minimally invasive arthroscopic surgery with the reliability of the open procedure, though with an initial learning curve. Finally, Boileau et al described the utilization of low-profile cortical buttons for fixation in place of the traditional screws. Subsequent analysis has demonstrated no significant biomechanical differences in the two techniques with proposed benefits of improved graft union and positioning as well as decreased rates of neurologic injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Latarjet procedure has remained a reliable technique to address anterior shoulder instability. The initial technique has undergone several iterations in an effort to improve outcomes, minimize complications, and capitalize on the benefits of minimally invasive techniques. As technology and techniques improve, we anticipate that the all-arthroscopic Latarjet will become more commonly performed to address anterior shoulder instability.</p>","PeriodicalId":19669,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Reviews","volume":"17 ","pages":"133984"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276983/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arthroscopic Latarjet: Transition from Open to All Arthroscopic.\",\"authors\":\"Mary K Skalitzky, Christopher T Eberlin, Terry L Hayes, Brendan M Patterson, James V Nepola, Joseph W Galvin, Pascal Boileau\",\"doi\":\"10.52965/001c.133984\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Latarjet technique is the gold standard for treatment of anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss or hyperlaxity. Since its initial description by Latarjet in 1954, the procedure has undergone significant evolution. While existing literature describes each of the various advances and alterations in technique, there is no existing literature that describes the complete history of the Latarjet procedure.</p><p><strong>Questions/purposes: </strong>The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive review of the evolution of the Latarjet procedure, while highlighting the underlying biomechanical principles of the technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was performed as a systematic review of literature aimed at characterizing the history and rationale of the open Latarjet procedure as well as its initial outcomes and its subsequent evolution of technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Long-term studies of the open Latarjet procedure have consistently demonstrated low rates of recurrent instability, high patient satisfaction, and high rates of return to sport. Though a reliable procedure, complication rates have been reported between 7-35%. The arthroscopic Latarjet was first described in 2007 and combined the benefits of minimally invasive arthroscopic surgery with the reliability of the open procedure, though with an initial learning curve. Finally, Boileau et al described the utilization of low-profile cortical buttons for fixation in place of the traditional screws. Subsequent analysis has demonstrated no significant biomechanical differences in the two techniques with proposed benefits of improved graft union and positioning as well as decreased rates of neurologic injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Latarjet procedure has remained a reliable technique to address anterior shoulder instability. The initial technique has undergone several iterations in an effort to improve outcomes, minimize complications, and capitalize on the benefits of minimally invasive techniques. As technology and techniques improve, we anticipate that the all-arthroscopic Latarjet will become more commonly performed to address anterior shoulder instability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopedic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"133984\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276983/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopedic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.133984\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.133984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Latarjet技术是治疗前肩不稳伴肩胛骨丢失或过度松弛的金标准。自1954年Latarjet首次描述该程序以来,该程序经历了重大发展。虽然现有文献描述了技术上的各种进步和改变,但没有文献描述了Latarjet手术的完整历史。问题/目的:本研究的目的是全面回顾Latarjet手术的发展,同时强调该技术的潜在生物力学原理。方法:本研究对文献进行了系统回顾,旨在描述开放式Latarjet手术的历史和基本原理,以及其初始结果和随后的技术演变。结果:开放式Latarjet手术的长期研究一致表明,复发不稳定率低,患者满意度高,恢复运动率高。虽然是一种可靠的手术,但据报道并发症发生率在7-35%之间。关节镜Latarjet于2007年首次被描述,它结合了微创关节镜手术的优点和开放手术的可靠性,尽管有一个初始的学习曲线。最后,Boileau等人描述了使用低轮廓皮质按钮代替传统螺钉进行固定。随后的分析表明,两种技术在改善移植物愈合和定位以及降低神经损伤率方面没有显著的生物力学差异。结论:Latarjet手术仍然是治疗肩前路不稳定的可靠技术。最初的技术已经经历了几次迭代,以努力改善结果,减少并发症,并利用微创技术的好处。随着技术的进步,我们预计全关节镜下的Latarjet将越来越多地用于治疗肩前路不稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Arthroscopic Latarjet: Transition from Open to All Arthroscopic.

Background: The Latarjet technique is the gold standard for treatment of anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss or hyperlaxity. Since its initial description by Latarjet in 1954, the procedure has undergone significant evolution. While existing literature describes each of the various advances and alterations in technique, there is no existing literature that describes the complete history of the Latarjet procedure.

Questions/purposes: The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive review of the evolution of the Latarjet procedure, while highlighting the underlying biomechanical principles of the technique.

Methods: This study was performed as a systematic review of literature aimed at characterizing the history and rationale of the open Latarjet procedure as well as its initial outcomes and its subsequent evolution of technique.

Results: Long-term studies of the open Latarjet procedure have consistently demonstrated low rates of recurrent instability, high patient satisfaction, and high rates of return to sport. Though a reliable procedure, complication rates have been reported between 7-35%. The arthroscopic Latarjet was first described in 2007 and combined the benefits of minimally invasive arthroscopic surgery with the reliability of the open procedure, though with an initial learning curve. Finally, Boileau et al described the utilization of low-profile cortical buttons for fixation in place of the traditional screws. Subsequent analysis has demonstrated no significant biomechanical differences in the two techniques with proposed benefits of improved graft union and positioning as well as decreased rates of neurologic injury.

Conclusion: The Latarjet procedure has remained a reliable technique to address anterior shoulder instability. The initial technique has undergone several iterations in an effort to improve outcomes, minimize complications, and capitalize on the benefits of minimally invasive techniques. As technology and techniques improve, we anticipate that the all-arthroscopic Latarjet will become more commonly performed to address anterior shoulder instability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopedic Reviews
Orthopedic Reviews ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
122
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Reviews is an Open Access, online-only, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles concerned with any aspect of orthopedics, as well as diagnosis and treatment, trauma, surgical procedures, arthroscopy, sports medicine, rehabilitation, pediatric and geriatric orthopedics. All bone-related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology papers are also welcome. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, reviews and case reports of general interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信