先天性内斜视和先天性外斜视患者的屈光轮廓和角度偏差。

IF 1.6 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research Pub Date : 2025-06-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.18502/jovr.v20.15066
Masoud Khorrami-Nejad, Mohammad Reza Akbari, Ali Hassan Khaleel, Razieh Bahreini, Foroozan Narooie-Noori, Babak Masoomian
{"title":"先天性内斜视和先天性外斜视患者的屈光轮廓和角度偏差。","authors":"Masoud Khorrami-Nejad, Mohammad Reza Akbari, Ali Hassan Khaleel, Razieh Bahreini, Foroozan Narooie-Noori, Babak Masoomian","doi":"10.18502/jovr.v20.15066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare refractive error and angle of deviation in patients with congenital esotropia (CET) and congenital exotropia (CXT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study reviewed the medical documents of 246 patients with CET (<i>n</i> = 206) and CXT (<i>n</i> = 40) admitted to Farabi Eye Hospital, Iran, from 2012 to 2022. All patients were between 6 and 12 months old at the time of admission. Refractive error components and angles of deviation in these patients were recorded and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In patients with CET, the mean sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent (SE) were 2.59 ± 2.28 diopters (D), -0.42 ± 0.57 D, and 2.38 ± 2.28 D, respectively. Also, the mean horizontal deviation at near was 45.5 ± 12.3 prism diopters (Δ) (range, 20-98 Δ). The most common range was 44-55 Δ (40%), followed by 33-44 Δ (28%) and 55-65 Δ (12%). On the other hand, the mean sphere, cylinder, and SE in patients with CXT were 1.88 ± 1.84 D, -0.39 ± 0.69 D, and 1.69 ± 1.74 D, respectively. Also, the mean horizontal deviation at near was 45.0 ± 17.1 Δ (range, 20-105 Δ). For the CXT group, deviation ranges of 33-44 Δ (37%), 44-55 Δ (32%), and 22-33 Δ (15%) were most prevalent. The mean sphere and SE were significantly higher in the CET group than in the CXT group (P = 0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found a distinct refractive profile and distribution of the angle of deviation in patients with CET versus CXT. Patients with CET demonstrated significantly greater hyperopia than those with CXT.</p>","PeriodicalId":16586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","volume":"20 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12258378/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refractive Profile and Angle of Deviation in Patients with Congenital Esotropia and Congenital Exotropia.\",\"authors\":\"Masoud Khorrami-Nejad, Mohammad Reza Akbari, Ali Hassan Khaleel, Razieh Bahreini, Foroozan Narooie-Noori, Babak Masoomian\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jovr.v20.15066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare refractive error and angle of deviation in patients with congenital esotropia (CET) and congenital exotropia (CXT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study reviewed the medical documents of 246 patients with CET (<i>n</i> = 206) and CXT (<i>n</i> = 40) admitted to Farabi Eye Hospital, Iran, from 2012 to 2022. All patients were between 6 and 12 months old at the time of admission. Refractive error components and angles of deviation in these patients were recorded and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In patients with CET, the mean sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent (SE) were 2.59 ± 2.28 diopters (D), -0.42 ± 0.57 D, and 2.38 ± 2.28 D, respectively. Also, the mean horizontal deviation at near was 45.5 ± 12.3 prism diopters (Δ) (range, 20-98 Δ). The most common range was 44-55 Δ (40%), followed by 33-44 Δ (28%) and 55-65 Δ (12%). On the other hand, the mean sphere, cylinder, and SE in patients with CXT were 1.88 ± 1.84 D, -0.39 ± 0.69 D, and 1.69 ± 1.74 D, respectively. Also, the mean horizontal deviation at near was 45.0 ± 17.1 Δ (range, 20-105 Δ). For the CXT group, deviation ranges of 33-44 Δ (37%), 44-55 Δ (32%), and 22-33 Δ (15%) were most prevalent. The mean sphere and SE were significantly higher in the CET group than in the CXT group (P = 0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found a distinct refractive profile and distribution of the angle of deviation in patients with CET versus CXT. Patients with CET demonstrated significantly greater hyperopia than those with CXT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12258378/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v20.15066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v20.15066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较先天性内斜视(CET)和先天性外斜视(CXT)患者的屈光不正和角度偏差。方法:回顾性分析2012 - 2022年伊朗法拉比眼科医院收治的246例CET (n = 206)和CXT (n = 40)患者的医疗资料。所有患者入院时年龄在6至12个月之间。记录并分析这些患者的屈光不正成分和偏角。结果:CET患者的平均球、柱、球等效(SE)分别为2.59±2.28屈光度(D)、-0.42±0.57 D、2.38±2.28 D。近距离平均水平偏差为45.5±12.3棱镜屈光度(Δ)(范围20-98 Δ)。最常见的是44-55岁Δ(40%),其次是33-44岁Δ(28%)和55-65岁Δ(12%)。而CXT患者的平均球、柱、SE分别为1.88±1.84 D、-0.39±0.69 D、1.69±1.74 D。附近的平均水平偏差为45.0±17.1 Δ(范围20-105 Δ)。对于CXT组,偏差范围为33-44 Δ (37%), 44-55 Δ(32%)和22-33 Δ(15%)。CET组的平均球和SE明显高于CXT组(P = 0.010)。结论:本研究发现CET与CXT患者有明显的屈光分布和偏角分布。CET患者的远视明显高于CXT患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Refractive Profile and Angle of Deviation in Patients with Congenital Esotropia and Congenital Exotropia.

Purpose: To compare refractive error and angle of deviation in patients with congenital esotropia (CET) and congenital exotropia (CXT).

Methods: This retrospective study reviewed the medical documents of 246 patients with CET (n = 206) and CXT (n = 40) admitted to Farabi Eye Hospital, Iran, from 2012 to 2022. All patients were between 6 and 12 months old at the time of admission. Refractive error components and angles of deviation in these patients were recorded and analyzed.

Results: In patients with CET, the mean sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent (SE) were 2.59 ± 2.28 diopters (D), -0.42 ± 0.57 D, and 2.38 ± 2.28 D, respectively. Also, the mean horizontal deviation at near was 45.5 ± 12.3 prism diopters (Δ) (range, 20-98 Δ). The most common range was 44-55 Δ (40%), followed by 33-44 Δ (28%) and 55-65 Δ (12%). On the other hand, the mean sphere, cylinder, and SE in patients with CXT were 1.88 ± 1.84 D, -0.39 ± 0.69 D, and 1.69 ± 1.74 D, respectively. Also, the mean horizontal deviation at near was 45.0 ± 17.1 Δ (range, 20-105 Δ). For the CXT group, deviation ranges of 33-44 Δ (37%), 44-55 Δ (32%), and 22-33 Δ (15%) were most prevalent. The mean sphere and SE were significantly higher in the CET group than in the CXT group (P = 0.010).

Conclusion: This study found a distinct refractive profile and distribution of the angle of deviation in patients with CET versus CXT. Patients with CET demonstrated significantly greater hyperopia than those with CXT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信