Masoud Khorrami-Nejad, Mohammad Reza Akbari, Ali Hassan Khaleel, Razieh Bahreini, Foroozan Narooie-Noori, Babak Masoomian
{"title":"先天性内斜视和先天性外斜视患者的屈光轮廓和角度偏差。","authors":"Masoud Khorrami-Nejad, Mohammad Reza Akbari, Ali Hassan Khaleel, Razieh Bahreini, Foroozan Narooie-Noori, Babak Masoomian","doi":"10.18502/jovr.v20.15066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare refractive error and angle of deviation in patients with congenital esotropia (CET) and congenital exotropia (CXT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study reviewed the medical documents of 246 patients with CET (<i>n</i> = 206) and CXT (<i>n</i> = 40) admitted to Farabi Eye Hospital, Iran, from 2012 to 2022. All patients were between 6 and 12 months old at the time of admission. Refractive error components and angles of deviation in these patients were recorded and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In patients with CET, the mean sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent (SE) were 2.59 ± 2.28 diopters (D), -0.42 ± 0.57 D, and 2.38 ± 2.28 D, respectively. Also, the mean horizontal deviation at near was 45.5 ± 12.3 prism diopters (Δ) (range, 20-98 Δ). The most common range was 44-55 Δ (40%), followed by 33-44 Δ (28%) and 55-65 Δ (12%). On the other hand, the mean sphere, cylinder, and SE in patients with CXT were 1.88 ± 1.84 D, -0.39 ± 0.69 D, and 1.69 ± 1.74 D, respectively. Also, the mean horizontal deviation at near was 45.0 ± 17.1 Δ (range, 20-105 Δ). For the CXT group, deviation ranges of 33-44 Δ (37%), 44-55 Δ (32%), and 22-33 Δ (15%) were most prevalent. The mean sphere and SE were significantly higher in the CET group than in the CXT group (P = 0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found a distinct refractive profile and distribution of the angle of deviation in patients with CET versus CXT. Patients with CET demonstrated significantly greater hyperopia than those with CXT.</p>","PeriodicalId":16586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","volume":"20 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12258378/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refractive Profile and Angle of Deviation in Patients with Congenital Esotropia and Congenital Exotropia.\",\"authors\":\"Masoud Khorrami-Nejad, Mohammad Reza Akbari, Ali Hassan Khaleel, Razieh Bahreini, Foroozan Narooie-Noori, Babak Masoomian\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jovr.v20.15066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare refractive error and angle of deviation in patients with congenital esotropia (CET) and congenital exotropia (CXT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study reviewed the medical documents of 246 patients with CET (<i>n</i> = 206) and CXT (<i>n</i> = 40) admitted to Farabi Eye Hospital, Iran, from 2012 to 2022. All patients were between 6 and 12 months old at the time of admission. Refractive error components and angles of deviation in these patients were recorded and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In patients with CET, the mean sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent (SE) were 2.59 ± 2.28 diopters (D), -0.42 ± 0.57 D, and 2.38 ± 2.28 D, respectively. Also, the mean horizontal deviation at near was 45.5 ± 12.3 prism diopters (Δ) (range, 20-98 Δ). The most common range was 44-55 Δ (40%), followed by 33-44 Δ (28%) and 55-65 Δ (12%). On the other hand, the mean sphere, cylinder, and SE in patients with CXT were 1.88 ± 1.84 D, -0.39 ± 0.69 D, and 1.69 ± 1.74 D, respectively. Also, the mean horizontal deviation at near was 45.0 ± 17.1 Δ (range, 20-105 Δ). For the CXT group, deviation ranges of 33-44 Δ (37%), 44-55 Δ (32%), and 22-33 Δ (15%) were most prevalent. The mean sphere and SE were significantly higher in the CET group than in the CXT group (P = 0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found a distinct refractive profile and distribution of the angle of deviation in patients with CET versus CXT. Patients with CET demonstrated significantly greater hyperopia than those with CXT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12258378/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v20.15066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v20.15066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Refractive Profile and Angle of Deviation in Patients with Congenital Esotropia and Congenital Exotropia.
Purpose: To compare refractive error and angle of deviation in patients with congenital esotropia (CET) and congenital exotropia (CXT).
Methods: This retrospective study reviewed the medical documents of 246 patients with CET (n = 206) and CXT (n = 40) admitted to Farabi Eye Hospital, Iran, from 2012 to 2022. All patients were between 6 and 12 months old at the time of admission. Refractive error components and angles of deviation in these patients were recorded and analyzed.
Results: In patients with CET, the mean sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent (SE) were 2.59 ± 2.28 diopters (D), -0.42 ± 0.57 D, and 2.38 ± 2.28 D, respectively. Also, the mean horizontal deviation at near was 45.5 ± 12.3 prism diopters (Δ) (range, 20-98 Δ). The most common range was 44-55 Δ (40%), followed by 33-44 Δ (28%) and 55-65 Δ (12%). On the other hand, the mean sphere, cylinder, and SE in patients with CXT were 1.88 ± 1.84 D, -0.39 ± 0.69 D, and 1.69 ± 1.74 D, respectively. Also, the mean horizontal deviation at near was 45.0 ± 17.1 Δ (range, 20-105 Δ). For the CXT group, deviation ranges of 33-44 Δ (37%), 44-55 Δ (32%), and 22-33 Δ (15%) were most prevalent. The mean sphere and SE were significantly higher in the CET group than in the CXT group (P = 0.010).
Conclusion: This study found a distinct refractive profile and distribution of the angle of deviation in patients with CET versus CXT. Patients with CET demonstrated significantly greater hyperopia than those with CXT.