钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂和二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂对糖尿病黄斑水肿的影响及玻璃体内注射的必要性。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
International journal of ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-07-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.18240/ijo.2025.07.16
Yoo-Ri Chung, Chungwoon Kim, Eunzee Lee, Kihwang Lee
{"title":"钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂和二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂对糖尿病黄斑水肿的影响及玻璃体内注射的必要性。","authors":"Yoo-Ri Chung, Chungwoon Kim, Eunzee Lee, Kihwang Lee","doi":"10.18240/ijo.2025.07.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on diabetic macular edema (DME) and the need for intravitreal injections (IVT) in patients with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were retrospectively collected from the medical records of patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) taking either DPP4i or SGLT2i as secondary oral hypoglycemic agents in addition to metformin between January 2019 and July 2022. We compared the prevalence of DME and the need for IVT among patients treated with DPP4i or SGLT2i. Propensity score matching was performed using the following variables: age, duration of diabetes, blood glucose control (HbA1c) level, and severity of DR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 268 patients with DR were included in this study. More DPP4i users needed IVT than SGLT2i users (35.3% <i>vs</i> 18.0%, <i>P</i>=0.011), while the prevalence of DME was not different. The use of SGLT2i was associated with a lower need for IVT than DPP4i [odds ratio (OR) 0.404, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.198-0.823], and similar trends were observed after propensity score matching (OR 0.419, 95%CI 0.181-0.970). However, this tendency was not significant in multiple logistic regressions. For DME, the use of DPP4i was not a significant risk factor compared to SGLT2i.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of SGLT2i may be associated with a lower need for IVT for overall DR complications, while other factors may contribute to this effect. The effect of SGLT2i on the prevention of DME is not evident.</p>","PeriodicalId":14312,"journal":{"name":"International journal of ophthalmology","volume":"18 7","pages":"1326-1332"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12207314/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on diabetic macular edema and the need for intravitreal injection.\",\"authors\":\"Yoo-Ri Chung, Chungwoon Kim, Eunzee Lee, Kihwang Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.18240/ijo.2025.07.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on diabetic macular edema (DME) and the need for intravitreal injections (IVT) in patients with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were retrospectively collected from the medical records of patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) taking either DPP4i or SGLT2i as secondary oral hypoglycemic agents in addition to metformin between January 2019 and July 2022. We compared the prevalence of DME and the need for IVT among patients treated with DPP4i or SGLT2i. Propensity score matching was performed using the following variables: age, duration of diabetes, blood glucose control (HbA1c) level, and severity of DR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 268 patients with DR were included in this study. More DPP4i users needed IVT than SGLT2i users (35.3% <i>vs</i> 18.0%, <i>P</i>=0.011), while the prevalence of DME was not different. The use of SGLT2i was associated with a lower need for IVT than DPP4i [odds ratio (OR) 0.404, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.198-0.823], and similar trends were observed after propensity score matching (OR 0.419, 95%CI 0.181-0.970). However, this tendency was not significant in multiple logistic regressions. For DME, the use of DPP4i was not a significant risk factor compared to SGLT2i.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of SGLT2i may be associated with a lower need for IVT for overall DR complications, while other factors may contribute to this effect. The effect of SGLT2i on the prevention of DME is not evident.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"18 7\",\"pages\":\"1326-1332\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12207314/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2025.07.16\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2025.07.16","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP4i)和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂(SGLT2i)对2型糖尿病患者糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的影响及玻璃体内注射(IVT)的必要性。方法:回顾性收集2019年1月至2022年7月期间,除二甲双胍外,还服用DPP4i或SGLT2i作为二次口服降糖药的糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)患者的病历数据。我们比较了DPP4i或SGLT2i治疗的患者中DME的患病率和IVT的需求。使用以下变量进行倾向评分匹配:年龄、糖尿病病程、血糖控制(HbA1c)水平和DR的严重程度。结果:本研究共纳入268例DR患者。DPP4i使用者比SGLT2i使用者更需要IVT (35.3% vs 18.0%, P=0.011),而DME患病率无差异。与DPP4i相比,SGLT2i的使用与IVT需求较低相关[比值比(OR) 0.404, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.198-0.823],倾向评分匹配后也观察到类似的趋势(OR 0.419, 95%CI 0.181-0.970)。然而,这种趋势在多元逻辑回归中并不显著。对于二甲醚,与SGLT2i相比,DPP4i的使用并不是一个显著的危险因素。结论:SGLT2i的使用可能与总体DR并发症的IVT需求降低有关,而其他因素可能有助于这种效果。SGLT2i对DME的预防作用不明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on diabetic macular edema and the need for intravitreal injection.

Aim: To investigate the effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on diabetic macular edema (DME) and the need for intravitreal injections (IVT) in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from the medical records of patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) taking either DPP4i or SGLT2i as secondary oral hypoglycemic agents in addition to metformin between January 2019 and July 2022. We compared the prevalence of DME and the need for IVT among patients treated with DPP4i or SGLT2i. Propensity score matching was performed using the following variables: age, duration of diabetes, blood glucose control (HbA1c) level, and severity of DR.

Results: A total of 268 patients with DR were included in this study. More DPP4i users needed IVT than SGLT2i users (35.3% vs 18.0%, P=0.011), while the prevalence of DME was not different. The use of SGLT2i was associated with a lower need for IVT than DPP4i [odds ratio (OR) 0.404, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.198-0.823], and similar trends were observed after propensity score matching (OR 0.419, 95%CI 0.181-0.970). However, this tendency was not significant in multiple logistic regressions. For DME, the use of DPP4i was not a significant risk factor compared to SGLT2i.

Conclusion: The use of SGLT2i may be associated with a lower need for IVT for overall DR complications, while other factors may contribute to this effect. The effect of SGLT2i on the prevention of DME is not evident.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
3141
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: · International Journal of Ophthalmology-IJO (English edition) is a global ophthalmological scientific publication and a peer-reviewed open access periodical (ISSN 2222-3959 print, ISSN 2227-4898 online). This journal is sponsored by Chinese Medical Association Xi’an Branch and obtains guidance and support from WHO and ICO (International Council of Ophthalmology). It has been indexed in SCIE, PubMed, PubMed-Central, Chemical Abstracts, Scopus, EMBASE , and DOAJ. IJO JCR IF in 2017 is 1.166. IJO was established in 2008, with editorial office in Xi’an, China. It is a monthly publication. General Scientific Advisors include Prof. Hugh Taylor (President of ICO); Prof.Bruce Spivey (Immediate Past President of ICO); Prof.Mark Tso (Ex-Vice President of ICO) and Prof.Daiming Fan (Academician and Vice President, Chinese Academy of Engineering. International Scientific Advisors include Prof. Serge Resnikoff (WHO Senior Speciatist for Prevention of blindness), Prof. Chi-Chao Chan (National Eye Institute, USA) and Prof. Richard L Abbott (Ex-President of AAO/PAAO) et al. Honorary Editors-in-Chief: Prof. Li-Xin Xie(Academician of Chinese Academy of Engineering/Honorary President of Chinese Ophthalmological Society); Prof. Dennis Lam (President of APAO) and Prof. Xiao-Xin Li (Ex-President of Chinese Ophthalmological Society). Chief Editor: Prof. Xiu-Wen Hu (President of IJO Press). Editors-in-Chief: Prof. Yan-Nian Hui (Ex-Director, Eye Institute of Chinese PLA) and Prof. George Chiou (Founding chief editor of Journal of Ocular Pharmacology & Therapeutics). Associate Editors-in-Chief include: Prof. Ning-Li Wang (President Elect of APAO); Prof. Ke Yao (President of Chinese Ophthalmological Society) ; Prof.William Smiddy (Bascom Palmer Eye instituteUSA) ; Prof.Joel Schuman (President of Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology,USA); Prof.Yizhi Liu (Vice President of Chinese Ophtlalmology Society); Prof.Yu-Sheng Wang (Director of Eye Institute of Chinese PLA); Prof.Ling-Yun Cheng (Director of Ocular Pharmacology, Shiley Eye Center, USA). IJO accepts contributions in English from all over the world. It includes mainly original articles and review articles, both basic and clinical papers. Instruction is Welcome Contribution is Welcome Citation is Welcome Cooperation organization International Council of Ophthalmology(ICO), PubMed, PMC, American Academy of Ophthalmology, Asia-Pacific, Thomson Reuters, The Charlesworth Group, Crossref,Scopus,Publons, DOAJ etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信