Frank Vicini, Chirag Shah, Karuna Mittal, Sheila Weinmann, Michael Leo, G Bruce Mann, Fredrik Warnberg, Rachel Rabinovitch, Brian Czerniecki, Icro Meattini, Atif Jalees Khan, Sachin Jhawar, Naamit Gerber, Shawna C Willey, Pat Borgen, Zahraa AlHilli, Megan Kruse, David Dabbs, Steven C Shivers, Anna Daily, Pat Whitworth, Michael Alvarado, Jason A Mouabbi, Meena Moran, Hope Rugo, Joyce A O'Shaughnessy, Troy Bremer
{"title":"仅应用临床病理因素预测低危导管原位癌保乳术后放疗获益的局限性:基于10年同侧乳房复发率的7基因生物标记的影响。","authors":"Frank Vicini, Chirag Shah, Karuna Mittal, Sheila Weinmann, Michael Leo, G Bruce Mann, Fredrik Warnberg, Rachel Rabinovitch, Brian Czerniecki, Icro Meattini, Atif Jalees Khan, Sachin Jhawar, Naamit Gerber, Shawna C Willey, Pat Borgen, Zahraa AlHilli, Megan Kruse, David Dabbs, Steven C Shivers, Anna Daily, Pat Whitworth, Michael Alvarado, Jason A Mouabbi, Meena Moran, Hope Rugo, Joyce A O'Shaughnessy, Troy Bremer","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.07.1411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinicopathologic (CP) factors are used to estimate 10-year ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR) risk and inform shared decision-making regarding post-operative radiation treatment (RT) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients. This study assesses the clinical value of the 7-gene biosignature (Lab-Location) compared to traditional CP definitions for predicting IBR rates and RT benefit. DCIS patients (n=926) treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) ±RT were categorized as CP low-risk or high-risk based on established CP factors, study criteria, and nomograms. Women were classified as molecular Low Risk or High Risk by the biosignature. Ten-year IBR rates for CP risk groups were compared to and stratified by the biosignature. There were 37% of women classified as molecular Low Risk by the biosignature, while on average 47% were classified as low-risk by various CP definitions (range: 35-60%). Overall, CP low-risk groups had a mean absolute IBR benefit with RT of 6% (HR, 0.46; p<.001). The biosignature reclassified 53% of CP low-risk patients to molecular High Risk. These reclassified patients experienced higher IBR rates when RT was omitted and benefited from RT (HR, 0.30; p<.001) with an absolute reduction of 11.6% (17.7% vs. 6.1%). CP low-risk patients with concordant biosignature Low Risk demonstrated no significant RT benefit. On average, 28% of high-risk CP patients were reclassified as biosignature Low Risk and had no significant RT benefit (5.9% vs. 4.0%). This observational study supports optimizing de-escalation/escalation treatment strategies for DCIS, the 7-gene biosignature reliably discriminated a low-risk group without significant RT benefit compared to CP factors alone and an elevated risk group that benefitted from RT, facilitating improved shared decision making. A randomized clinical trial (NRG CC-016) will provide Level 1A evidence for the impact of RT treatment on IBR rates for patients in the 7-gene biosignature Low Risk group, including those with CP high-risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limitations in the Application of Clinicopathologic Factors Alone in Predicting Radiation Benefit for Women with Low-Risk Ductal Carcinoma in Situ after Breast Conserving Surgery: The Impact of a 7-gene Biosignature based on 10-Year Ipsilateral Breast Recurrence (IBR) Rates.\",\"authors\":\"Frank Vicini, Chirag Shah, Karuna Mittal, Sheila Weinmann, Michael Leo, G Bruce Mann, Fredrik Warnberg, Rachel Rabinovitch, Brian Czerniecki, Icro Meattini, Atif Jalees Khan, Sachin Jhawar, Naamit Gerber, Shawna C Willey, Pat Borgen, Zahraa AlHilli, Megan Kruse, David Dabbs, Steven C Shivers, Anna Daily, Pat Whitworth, Michael Alvarado, Jason A Mouabbi, Meena Moran, Hope Rugo, Joyce A O'Shaughnessy, Troy Bremer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.07.1411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Clinicopathologic (CP) factors are used to estimate 10-year ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR) risk and inform shared decision-making regarding post-operative radiation treatment (RT) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients. This study assesses the clinical value of the 7-gene biosignature (Lab-Location) compared to traditional CP definitions for predicting IBR rates and RT benefit. DCIS patients (n=926) treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) ±RT were categorized as CP low-risk or high-risk based on established CP factors, study criteria, and nomograms. Women were classified as molecular Low Risk or High Risk by the biosignature. Ten-year IBR rates for CP risk groups were compared to and stratified by the biosignature. There were 37% of women classified as molecular Low Risk by the biosignature, while on average 47% were classified as low-risk by various CP definitions (range: 35-60%). Overall, CP low-risk groups had a mean absolute IBR benefit with RT of 6% (HR, 0.46; p<.001). The biosignature reclassified 53% of CP low-risk patients to molecular High Risk. These reclassified patients experienced higher IBR rates when RT was omitted and benefited from RT (HR, 0.30; p<.001) with an absolute reduction of 11.6% (17.7% vs. 6.1%). CP low-risk patients with concordant biosignature Low Risk demonstrated no significant RT benefit. On average, 28% of high-risk CP patients were reclassified as biosignature Low Risk and had no significant RT benefit (5.9% vs. 4.0%). This observational study supports optimizing de-escalation/escalation treatment strategies for DCIS, the 7-gene biosignature reliably discriminated a low-risk group without significant RT benefit compared to CP factors alone and an elevated risk group that benefitted from RT, facilitating improved shared decision making. A randomized clinical trial (NRG CC-016) will provide Level 1A evidence for the impact of RT treatment on IBR rates for patients in the 7-gene biosignature Low Risk group, including those with CP high-risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.07.1411\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.07.1411","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Limitations in the Application of Clinicopathologic Factors Alone in Predicting Radiation Benefit for Women with Low-Risk Ductal Carcinoma in Situ after Breast Conserving Surgery: The Impact of a 7-gene Biosignature based on 10-Year Ipsilateral Breast Recurrence (IBR) Rates.
Clinicopathologic (CP) factors are used to estimate 10-year ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR) risk and inform shared decision-making regarding post-operative radiation treatment (RT) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients. This study assesses the clinical value of the 7-gene biosignature (Lab-Location) compared to traditional CP definitions for predicting IBR rates and RT benefit. DCIS patients (n=926) treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) ±RT were categorized as CP low-risk or high-risk based on established CP factors, study criteria, and nomograms. Women were classified as molecular Low Risk or High Risk by the biosignature. Ten-year IBR rates for CP risk groups were compared to and stratified by the biosignature. There were 37% of women classified as molecular Low Risk by the biosignature, while on average 47% were classified as low-risk by various CP definitions (range: 35-60%). Overall, CP low-risk groups had a mean absolute IBR benefit with RT of 6% (HR, 0.46; p<.001). The biosignature reclassified 53% of CP low-risk patients to molecular High Risk. These reclassified patients experienced higher IBR rates when RT was omitted and benefited from RT (HR, 0.30; p<.001) with an absolute reduction of 11.6% (17.7% vs. 6.1%). CP low-risk patients with concordant biosignature Low Risk demonstrated no significant RT benefit. On average, 28% of high-risk CP patients were reclassified as biosignature Low Risk and had no significant RT benefit (5.9% vs. 4.0%). This observational study supports optimizing de-escalation/escalation treatment strategies for DCIS, the 7-gene biosignature reliably discriminated a low-risk group without significant RT benefit compared to CP factors alone and an elevated risk group that benefitted from RT, facilitating improved shared decision making. A randomized clinical trial (NRG CC-016) will provide Level 1A evidence for the impact of RT treatment on IBR rates for patients in the 7-gene biosignature Low Risk group, including those with CP high-risk.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field.
This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.