仅应用临床病理因素预测低危导管原位癌保乳术后放疗获益的局限性:基于10年同侧乳房复发率的7基因生物标记的影响。

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Frank Vicini, Chirag Shah, Karuna Mittal, Sheila Weinmann, Michael Leo, G Bruce Mann, Fredrik Warnberg, Rachel Rabinovitch, Brian Czerniecki, Icro Meattini, Atif Jalees Khan, Sachin Jhawar, Naamit Gerber, Shawna C Willey, Pat Borgen, Zahraa AlHilli, Megan Kruse, David Dabbs, Steven C Shivers, Anna Daily, Pat Whitworth, Michael Alvarado, Jason A Mouabbi, Meena Moran, Hope Rugo, Joyce A O'Shaughnessy, Troy Bremer
{"title":"仅应用临床病理因素预测低危导管原位癌保乳术后放疗获益的局限性:基于10年同侧乳房复发率的7基因生物标记的影响。","authors":"Frank Vicini, Chirag Shah, Karuna Mittal, Sheila Weinmann, Michael Leo, G Bruce Mann, Fredrik Warnberg, Rachel Rabinovitch, Brian Czerniecki, Icro Meattini, Atif Jalees Khan, Sachin Jhawar, Naamit Gerber, Shawna C Willey, Pat Borgen, Zahraa AlHilli, Megan Kruse, David Dabbs, Steven C Shivers, Anna Daily, Pat Whitworth, Michael Alvarado, Jason A Mouabbi, Meena Moran, Hope Rugo, Joyce A O'Shaughnessy, Troy Bremer","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.07.1411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinicopathologic (CP) factors are used to estimate 10-year ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR) risk and inform shared decision-making regarding post-operative radiation treatment (RT) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients. This study assesses the clinical value of the 7-gene biosignature (Lab-Location) compared to traditional CP definitions for predicting IBR rates and RT benefit. DCIS patients (n=926) treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) ±RT were categorized as CP low-risk or high-risk based on established CP factors, study criteria, and nomograms. Women were classified as molecular Low Risk or High Risk by the biosignature. Ten-year IBR rates for CP risk groups were compared to and stratified by the biosignature. There were 37% of women classified as molecular Low Risk by the biosignature, while on average 47% were classified as low-risk by various CP definitions (range: 35-60%). Overall, CP low-risk groups had a mean absolute IBR benefit with RT of 6% (HR, 0.46; p<.001). The biosignature reclassified 53% of CP low-risk patients to molecular High Risk. These reclassified patients experienced higher IBR rates when RT was omitted and benefited from RT (HR, 0.30; p<.001) with an absolute reduction of 11.6% (17.7% vs. 6.1%). CP low-risk patients with concordant biosignature Low Risk demonstrated no significant RT benefit. On average, 28% of high-risk CP patients were reclassified as biosignature Low Risk and had no significant RT benefit (5.9% vs. 4.0%). This observational study supports optimizing de-escalation/escalation treatment strategies for DCIS, the 7-gene biosignature reliably discriminated a low-risk group without significant RT benefit compared to CP factors alone and an elevated risk group that benefitted from RT, facilitating improved shared decision making. A randomized clinical trial (NRG CC-016) will provide Level 1A evidence for the impact of RT treatment on IBR rates for patients in the 7-gene biosignature Low Risk group, including those with CP high-risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limitations in the Application of Clinicopathologic Factors Alone in Predicting Radiation Benefit for Women with Low-Risk Ductal Carcinoma in Situ after Breast Conserving Surgery: The Impact of a 7-gene Biosignature based on 10-Year Ipsilateral Breast Recurrence (IBR) Rates.\",\"authors\":\"Frank Vicini, Chirag Shah, Karuna Mittal, Sheila Weinmann, Michael Leo, G Bruce Mann, Fredrik Warnberg, Rachel Rabinovitch, Brian Czerniecki, Icro Meattini, Atif Jalees Khan, Sachin Jhawar, Naamit Gerber, Shawna C Willey, Pat Borgen, Zahraa AlHilli, Megan Kruse, David Dabbs, Steven C Shivers, Anna Daily, Pat Whitworth, Michael Alvarado, Jason A Mouabbi, Meena Moran, Hope Rugo, Joyce A O'Shaughnessy, Troy Bremer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.07.1411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Clinicopathologic (CP) factors are used to estimate 10-year ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR) risk and inform shared decision-making regarding post-operative radiation treatment (RT) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients. This study assesses the clinical value of the 7-gene biosignature (Lab-Location) compared to traditional CP definitions for predicting IBR rates and RT benefit. DCIS patients (n=926) treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) ±RT were categorized as CP low-risk or high-risk based on established CP factors, study criteria, and nomograms. Women were classified as molecular Low Risk or High Risk by the biosignature. Ten-year IBR rates for CP risk groups were compared to and stratified by the biosignature. There were 37% of women classified as molecular Low Risk by the biosignature, while on average 47% were classified as low-risk by various CP definitions (range: 35-60%). Overall, CP low-risk groups had a mean absolute IBR benefit with RT of 6% (HR, 0.46; p<.001). The biosignature reclassified 53% of CP low-risk patients to molecular High Risk. These reclassified patients experienced higher IBR rates when RT was omitted and benefited from RT (HR, 0.30; p<.001) with an absolute reduction of 11.6% (17.7% vs. 6.1%). CP low-risk patients with concordant biosignature Low Risk demonstrated no significant RT benefit. On average, 28% of high-risk CP patients were reclassified as biosignature Low Risk and had no significant RT benefit (5.9% vs. 4.0%). This observational study supports optimizing de-escalation/escalation treatment strategies for DCIS, the 7-gene biosignature reliably discriminated a low-risk group without significant RT benefit compared to CP factors alone and an elevated risk group that benefitted from RT, facilitating improved shared decision making. A randomized clinical trial (NRG CC-016) will provide Level 1A evidence for the impact of RT treatment on IBR rates for patients in the 7-gene biosignature Low Risk group, including those with CP high-risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.07.1411\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.07.1411","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床病理(CP)因素用于评估10年同侧乳房复发(IBR)风险,并为导管原位癌(DCIS)患者术后放射治疗(RT)的共同决策提供信息。本研究评估了7基因生物标记(实验室定位)与传统CP定义在预测IBR率和RT获益方面的临床价值。采用保乳手术(BCS)±RT治疗的DCIS患者(n=926)根据已建立的CP因素、研究标准和x线图分为CP低危或高危两组。通过生物标记将女性分为分子低风险和分子高风险。通过生物标记对CP危险组的10年IBR率进行比较和分层。37%的女性被生物标记归为分子低风险,而平均47%的女性被各种CP定义归为低风险(范围:35-60%)。总体而言,CP低风险组的平均绝对IBR获益为6% (HR, 0.46;p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Limitations in the Application of Clinicopathologic Factors Alone in Predicting Radiation Benefit for Women with Low-Risk Ductal Carcinoma in Situ after Breast Conserving Surgery: The Impact of a 7-gene Biosignature based on 10-Year Ipsilateral Breast Recurrence (IBR) Rates.

Clinicopathologic (CP) factors are used to estimate 10-year ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR) risk and inform shared decision-making regarding post-operative radiation treatment (RT) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients. This study assesses the clinical value of the 7-gene biosignature (Lab-Location) compared to traditional CP definitions for predicting IBR rates and RT benefit. DCIS patients (n=926) treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) ±RT were categorized as CP low-risk or high-risk based on established CP factors, study criteria, and nomograms. Women were classified as molecular Low Risk or High Risk by the biosignature. Ten-year IBR rates for CP risk groups were compared to and stratified by the biosignature. There were 37% of women classified as molecular Low Risk by the biosignature, while on average 47% were classified as low-risk by various CP definitions (range: 35-60%). Overall, CP low-risk groups had a mean absolute IBR benefit with RT of 6% (HR, 0.46; p<.001). The biosignature reclassified 53% of CP low-risk patients to molecular High Risk. These reclassified patients experienced higher IBR rates when RT was omitted and benefited from RT (HR, 0.30; p<.001) with an absolute reduction of 11.6% (17.7% vs. 6.1%). CP low-risk patients with concordant biosignature Low Risk demonstrated no significant RT benefit. On average, 28% of high-risk CP patients were reclassified as biosignature Low Risk and had no significant RT benefit (5.9% vs. 4.0%). This observational study supports optimizing de-escalation/escalation treatment strategies for DCIS, the 7-gene biosignature reliably discriminated a low-risk group without significant RT benefit compared to CP factors alone and an elevated risk group that benefitted from RT, facilitating improved shared decision making. A randomized clinical trial (NRG CC-016) will provide Level 1A evidence for the impact of RT treatment on IBR rates for patients in the 7-gene biosignature Low Risk group, including those with CP high-risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信