未控制的2型糖尿病患者接受利格列汀或维格列汀的肾功能比较:新冠肺炎大流行背景下的观察性研究

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Indian Journal of Pharmacology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-21 DOI:10.4103/ijp.ijp_492_24
Sailayee Chaudhuri, Supreeti Biswas, Sandip Mukhopadhyay, Somnath Dasgupta
{"title":"未控制的2型糖尿病患者接受利格列汀或维格列汀的肾功能比较:新冠肺炎大流行背景下的观察性研究","authors":"Sailayee Chaudhuri, Supreeti Biswas, Sandip Mukhopadhyay, Somnath Dasgupta","doi":"10.4103/ijp.ijp_492_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are primarily excreted renally. Linagliptin is an exception with excretion primarily through enterohepatic system and is expected to have a better renal profile, though real-world data are scarce. Comparative studies on the renal safety and glycaemic control with linagliptin versus popular DPP-4 inhibitors such as vildagliptin are crucial, especially in the background of COVID-19 pandemic that hugely impacted glycemic control in India's large type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) population.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Adult T2DM patients not controlled with metformin alone, added linagliptin (5 mg once daily) or vildagliptin (50 mg twice daily) in the tertiary care outpatient department setting were included in the study. Parameters such as glycosylated hemoglobin, fasting blood glucose, postprandial blood glucose, blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), change in renal function, glycemic control, and clinical parameters were compared at baseline, 2 months, and 6 months of treatment. All adverse events were analyzed using the WHO-UMC scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups achieved similar glycemic control, however, accompanied with impairment of renal parameters after 6 months. Compared to linagliptin, almost 300% rise in creatinine and 140% fall in eGFR were noted in the vildagliptin recipients. However, the difference in serum creatinine or eGFR could not attain statistical significance in the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both linagliptin and vildagliptin can help to achieve glycemic control despite possible influence of the COVID-19 pandemic and are generally well tolerated. However, renal functions are better preserved with linagliptin. Further studies involving a larger sample size and longer follow-up are recommended before generalization of the findings of the present study.</p>","PeriodicalId":13490,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pharmacology","volume":"57 4","pages":"254-261"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12370227/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of renal function of the patients receiving linagliptin or vildagliptin in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus: An observational study in the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Sailayee Chaudhuri, Supreeti Biswas, Sandip Mukhopadhyay, Somnath Dasgupta\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijp.ijp_492_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are primarily excreted renally. Linagliptin is an exception with excretion primarily through enterohepatic system and is expected to have a better renal profile, though real-world data are scarce. Comparative studies on the renal safety and glycaemic control with linagliptin versus popular DPP-4 inhibitors such as vildagliptin are crucial, especially in the background of COVID-19 pandemic that hugely impacted glycemic control in India's large type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) population.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Adult T2DM patients not controlled with metformin alone, added linagliptin (5 mg once daily) or vildagliptin (50 mg twice daily) in the tertiary care outpatient department setting were included in the study. Parameters such as glycosylated hemoglobin, fasting blood glucose, postprandial blood glucose, blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), change in renal function, glycemic control, and clinical parameters were compared at baseline, 2 months, and 6 months of treatment. All adverse events were analyzed using the WHO-UMC scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups achieved similar glycemic control, however, accompanied with impairment of renal parameters after 6 months. Compared to linagliptin, almost 300% rise in creatinine and 140% fall in eGFR were noted in the vildagliptin recipients. However, the difference in serum creatinine or eGFR could not attain statistical significance in the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both linagliptin and vildagliptin can help to achieve glycemic control despite possible influence of the COVID-19 pandemic and are generally well tolerated. However, renal functions are better preserved with linagliptin. Further studies involving a larger sample size and longer follow-up are recommended before generalization of the findings of the present study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"57 4\",\"pages\":\"254-261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12370227/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijp.ijp_492_24\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijp.ijp_492_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:二肽基肽酶4 (DPP-4)抑制剂主要通过肾脏排出体外。利格列汀是一个例外,主要通过肠肝系统排泄,尽管缺乏实际数据,但预计其对肾脏的影响会更好。利格列汀与流行的DPP-4抑制剂(如维格列汀)的肾脏安全性和血糖控制的比较研究至关重要,特别是在COVID-19大流行的背景下,这种大流行严重影响了印度大量2型糖尿病(T2DM)人群的血糖控制。材料和方法:未单独使用二甲双胍控制的成人T2DM患者,在三级保健门诊设置添加利格列汀(5mg每日一次)或维格列汀(50mg每日两次)纳入研究。在基线、治疗2个月和治疗6个月时比较糖化血红蛋白、空腹血糖、餐后血糖、尿素氮、血清肌酐、肾小球滤过率(eGFR)、肾功能变化、血糖控制和临床参数等参数。使用WHO-UMC量表分析所有不良事件。结果:6个月后,两组患者的血糖控制情况相似,但均伴有肾脏参数的损害。与利格列汀相比,维格列汀受体肌酐升高近300%,eGFR下降140%。然而,血清肌酐或eGFR的差异在研究中未达到统计学意义。结论:利格列汀和维格列汀均能在新冠肺炎大流行的影响下实现血糖控制,且耐受性良好。然而,利格列汀能更好地保存肾功能。在推广本研究结果之前,建议进行更大样本量和更长时间随访的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of renal function of the patients receiving linagliptin or vildagliptin in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus: An observational study in the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Comparison of renal function of the patients receiving linagliptin or vildagliptin in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus: An observational study in the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Comparison of renal function of the patients receiving linagliptin or vildagliptin in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus: An observational study in the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Comparison of renal function of the patients receiving linagliptin or vildagliptin in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus: An observational study in the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are primarily excreted renally. Linagliptin is an exception with excretion primarily through enterohepatic system and is expected to have a better renal profile, though real-world data are scarce. Comparative studies on the renal safety and glycaemic control with linagliptin versus popular DPP-4 inhibitors such as vildagliptin are crucial, especially in the background of COVID-19 pandemic that hugely impacted glycemic control in India's large type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) population.

Materials and methods: Adult T2DM patients not controlled with metformin alone, added linagliptin (5 mg once daily) or vildagliptin (50 mg twice daily) in the tertiary care outpatient department setting were included in the study. Parameters such as glycosylated hemoglobin, fasting blood glucose, postprandial blood glucose, blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), change in renal function, glycemic control, and clinical parameters were compared at baseline, 2 months, and 6 months of treatment. All adverse events were analyzed using the WHO-UMC scale.

Results: Both groups achieved similar glycemic control, however, accompanied with impairment of renal parameters after 6 months. Compared to linagliptin, almost 300% rise in creatinine and 140% fall in eGFR were noted in the vildagliptin recipients. However, the difference in serum creatinine or eGFR could not attain statistical significance in the study.

Conclusion: Both linagliptin and vildagliptin can help to achieve glycemic control despite possible influence of the COVID-19 pandemic and are generally well tolerated. However, renal functions are better preserved with linagliptin. Further studies involving a larger sample size and longer follow-up are recommended before generalization of the findings of the present study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
53
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Pharmacology accepts, in English, review articles, articles for educational forum, original research articles (full length and short communications), letter to editor, case reports and interesting fillers. Articles concerning all aspects of pharmacology will be considered. Articles of general interest (e.g. methods, therapeutics, medical education, interesting websites, new drug information and commentary on a recent topic) are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信