急性失代偿性心力衰竭的血管紧张素-萘普利素抑制:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

IF 1 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Hosam I Taha, Abdalhakim Shubietah, Bashar M Al Zoubi, Mohamed S Elgendy, Hazem Reyad Mansour, Anas Abdulkader, Abdelrahman M Ghazal, Noura Shamis, Mohamed Abuelazm, Mustafa Turkmani, Robert J Mentz
{"title":"急性失代偿性心力衰竭的血管紧张素-萘普利素抑制:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。","authors":"Hosam I Taha, Abdalhakim Shubietah, Bashar M Al Zoubi, Mohamed S Elgendy, Hazem Reyad Mansour, Anas Abdulkader, Abdelrahman M Ghazal, Noura Shamis, Mohamed Abuelazm, Mustafa Turkmani, Robert J Mentz","doi":"10.1080/14796678.2025.2535218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Angiotensin receptor - neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) are well-established for chronic heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. However, their efficacy and safety after stabilization of acute decompensation (ADHF) remain unclear. This meta-analysis evaluates ARNI versus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) post-ADHF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from PubMed, Scopus, WOS, Embase, and CENTRAL up to November 2024. Risk ratios (RR) and standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three RCTs (1,741 patients) were included. ARNI use after ADHF stabilization significantly reduced HF rehospitalization/all-cause mortality (RR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.57-0.88; <i>p</i> < 0.01), HF rehospitalization (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.57-0.93; <i>p</i> = 0.01), worsening renal function (RR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.64-1.00; <i>p</i> = 0.048), and NT-proBNP at 4 weeks (SMD: -0.24; 95% CI: -0.34 to -0.14; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and 8 weeks (SMD: -0.21; 95% CI: -0.31 to -0.10; <i>p</i> = 0.0001). However, ARNI increased symptomatic hypotension risk (RR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.04-1.71; <i>p</i> = 0.024).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>initiation of ARNI after ADHF stabilization is more effective than ACEIs/ARBs for cardiovascular and renal outcomes, albeit with higher symptomatic hypotension risk.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration: </strong>PROSPERO: CRD42024618027.</p>","PeriodicalId":12589,"journal":{"name":"Future cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition in acute decompensated heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Hosam I Taha, Abdalhakim Shubietah, Bashar M Al Zoubi, Mohamed S Elgendy, Hazem Reyad Mansour, Anas Abdulkader, Abdelrahman M Ghazal, Noura Shamis, Mohamed Abuelazm, Mustafa Turkmani, Robert J Mentz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14796678.2025.2535218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Angiotensin receptor - neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) are well-established for chronic heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. However, their efficacy and safety after stabilization of acute decompensation (ADHF) remain unclear. This meta-analysis evaluates ARNI versus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) post-ADHF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from PubMed, Scopus, WOS, Embase, and CENTRAL up to November 2024. Risk ratios (RR) and standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three RCTs (1,741 patients) were included. ARNI use after ADHF stabilization significantly reduced HF rehospitalization/all-cause mortality (RR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.57-0.88; <i>p</i> < 0.01), HF rehospitalization (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.57-0.93; <i>p</i> = 0.01), worsening renal function (RR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.64-1.00; <i>p</i> = 0.048), and NT-proBNP at 4 weeks (SMD: -0.24; 95% CI: -0.34 to -0.14; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and 8 weeks (SMD: -0.21; 95% CI: -0.31 to -0.10; <i>p</i> = 0.0001). However, ARNI increased symptomatic hypotension risk (RR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.04-1.71; <i>p</i> = 0.024).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>initiation of ARNI after ADHF stabilization is more effective than ACEIs/ARBs for cardiovascular and renal outcomes, albeit with higher symptomatic hypotension risk.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration: </strong>PROSPERO: CRD42024618027.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796678.2025.2535218\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796678.2025.2535218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:血管紧张素受体- neprilysin抑制剂(ARNI)已被证实用于慢性心力衰竭(HF)伴射血分数降低。然而,它们在急性失代偿(ADHF)稳定后的疗效和安全性尚不清楚。本荟萃分析评估了adhf后ARNI与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEIs)或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs)的对比。方法:对截至2024年11月PubMed、Scopus、WOS、Embase和CENTRAL的随机对照试验(rct)进行meta分析。采用95%置信区间(CI)的风险比(RR)和标准化平均差异(SMD)。结果:纳入3项随机对照试验(rct),共1741例患者。ADHF稳定后使用ARNI可显著降低HF再住院/全因死亡率(RR: 0.71;95% ci: 0.57-0.88;p p = 0.01)、肾功能恶化(RR: 0.80;95% ci: 0.64-1.00;p = 0.048),第4周NT-proBNP (SMD: -0.24;95% CI: -0.34 ~ -0.14;p = 0.0001)。然而,ARNI增加了症状性低血压的风险(RR: 1.33;95% ci: 1.04-1.71;p = 0.024)。结论:ADHF稳定后开始ARNI比acei / arb对心血管和肾脏结局更有效,尽管有更高的症状性低血压风险。协议注册:PROSPERO: CRD42024618027。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition in acute decompensated heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background: Angiotensin receptor - neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) are well-established for chronic heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. However, their efficacy and safety after stabilization of acute decompensation (ADHF) remain unclear. This meta-analysis evaluates ARNI versus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) post-ADHF.

Methods: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from PubMed, Scopus, WOS, Embase, and CENTRAL up to November 2024. Risk ratios (RR) and standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used.

Results: Three RCTs (1,741 patients) were included. ARNI use after ADHF stabilization significantly reduced HF rehospitalization/all-cause mortality (RR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.57-0.88; p < 0.01), HF rehospitalization (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.57-0.93; p = 0.01), worsening renal function (RR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.64-1.00; p = 0.048), and NT-proBNP at 4 weeks (SMD: -0.24; 95% CI: -0.34 to -0.14; p < 0.0001) and 8 weeks (SMD: -0.21; 95% CI: -0.31 to -0.10; p = 0.0001). However, ARNI increased symptomatic hypotension risk (RR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.04-1.71; p = 0.024).

Conclusion: initiation of ARNI after ADHF stabilization is more effective than ACEIs/ARBs for cardiovascular and renal outcomes, albeit with higher symptomatic hypotension risk.

Protocol registration: PROSPERO: CRD42024618027.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Future cardiology
Future cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Research advances have contributed to improved outcomes across all specialties, but the rate of advancement in cardiology has been exceptional. Concurrently, the population of patients with cardiac conditions continues to grow and greater public awareness has increased patients" expectations of new drugs and devices. Future Cardiology (ISSN 1479-6678) reflects this new era of cardiology and highlights the new molecular approach to advancing cardiovascular therapy. Coverage will also reflect the major technological advances in bioengineering in cardiology in terms of advanced and robust devices, miniaturization, imaging, system modeling and information management issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信