{"title":"不同漂白凝胶和光源的变色稳定性:体外研究。","authors":"Abolfazl Bazari Jamkhaneh, Zohreh Moradi, Sina Sadeghabadi, Pooya Soltanzadeh, Nasim Chiniforush","doi":"10.18502/fid.v22i16.18545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> The aim of this study was to assess the color change (∆E) of teeth following the use of several bleaching protocols with power bleaching. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> This in vitro study evaluated 50 sound incisors and premolars. After cleaning, the teeth were immersed in a 2g/100mL tea solution for 6 days. The samples were randomly divided into 5 bleaching groups: Snow L [containing 40% hydrogen peroxide (HP) and 20% carbamide peroxide] with 980nm diode laser, White Smile (containing 32% HP) with LED (Monitex), Boost (containing 40% HP) with 980nm diode laser, Boost (containing 40% HP) with LED (Monitex), and Boost without activation. Color parameters were measured before and after staining, immediately and 1 week after bleaching by a spectrophotometer, and their ∆E was calculated and compared by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey's test. <b>Results:</b> All bleaching protocols improved the color parameters. The ∆E in each group was significant after bleaching compared to before bleaching in the cervical (P<0.001), middle (P<0.001) and incisal (P<0.001) thirds. The ∆E was significant at 1 week compared to before bleaching (P=0.002 for the cervical, P<0.001 for the middle, and P<0.001 for the incisal third, respectively), immediately after bleaching compared with after staining (all Ps<0.001), and also at 1 week compared with after staining (all Ps<0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> Within the study limitations, all power bleaching protocols caused color change of the teeth. The efficacy of Boost (conventional bleaching), Boost plus LED, and White Smile was better than Snow L regarding color change of teeth.</p>","PeriodicalId":12445,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Dentistry","volume":"22 ","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276775/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Color Change Stability Using Different Bleaching Gels and Light Sources: An in Vitro Study.\",\"authors\":\"Abolfazl Bazari Jamkhaneh, Zohreh Moradi, Sina Sadeghabadi, Pooya Soltanzadeh, Nasim Chiniforush\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/fid.v22i16.18545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> The aim of this study was to assess the color change (∆E) of teeth following the use of several bleaching protocols with power bleaching. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> This in vitro study evaluated 50 sound incisors and premolars. After cleaning, the teeth were immersed in a 2g/100mL tea solution for 6 days. The samples were randomly divided into 5 bleaching groups: Snow L [containing 40% hydrogen peroxide (HP) and 20% carbamide peroxide] with 980nm diode laser, White Smile (containing 32% HP) with LED (Monitex), Boost (containing 40% HP) with 980nm diode laser, Boost (containing 40% HP) with LED (Monitex), and Boost without activation. Color parameters were measured before and after staining, immediately and 1 week after bleaching by a spectrophotometer, and their ∆E was calculated and compared by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey's test. <b>Results:</b> All bleaching protocols improved the color parameters. The ∆E in each group was significant after bleaching compared to before bleaching in the cervical (P<0.001), middle (P<0.001) and incisal (P<0.001) thirds. The ∆E was significant at 1 week compared to before bleaching (P=0.002 for the cervical, P<0.001 for the middle, and P<0.001 for the incisal third, respectively), immediately after bleaching compared with after staining (all Ps<0.001), and also at 1 week compared with after staining (all Ps<0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> Within the study limitations, all power bleaching protocols caused color change of the teeth. The efficacy of Boost (conventional bleaching), Boost plus LED, and White Smile was better than Snow L regarding color change of teeth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"22 \",\"pages\":\"16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276775/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v22i16.18545\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v22i16.18545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
Color Change Stability Using Different Bleaching Gels and Light Sources: An in Vitro Study.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the color change (∆E) of teeth following the use of several bleaching protocols with power bleaching. Materials and Methods: This in vitro study evaluated 50 sound incisors and premolars. After cleaning, the teeth were immersed in a 2g/100mL tea solution for 6 days. The samples were randomly divided into 5 bleaching groups: Snow L [containing 40% hydrogen peroxide (HP) and 20% carbamide peroxide] with 980nm diode laser, White Smile (containing 32% HP) with LED (Monitex), Boost (containing 40% HP) with 980nm diode laser, Boost (containing 40% HP) with LED (Monitex), and Boost without activation. Color parameters were measured before and after staining, immediately and 1 week after bleaching by a spectrophotometer, and their ∆E was calculated and compared by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey's test. Results: All bleaching protocols improved the color parameters. The ∆E in each group was significant after bleaching compared to before bleaching in the cervical (P<0.001), middle (P<0.001) and incisal (P<0.001) thirds. The ∆E was significant at 1 week compared to before bleaching (P=0.002 for the cervical, P<0.001 for the middle, and P<0.001 for the incisal third, respectively), immediately after bleaching compared with after staining (all Ps<0.001), and also at 1 week compared with after staining (all Ps<0.001). Conclusion: Within the study limitations, all power bleaching protocols caused color change of the teeth. The efficacy of Boost (conventional bleaching), Boost plus LED, and White Smile was better than Snow L regarding color change of teeth.