磁共振成像对直肠癌患者盆腔外侧淋巴结转移的诊断价值:荟萃分析和系统回顾。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Diagnostic and interventional radiology Pub Date : 2025-09-08 Epub Date: 2025-07-21 DOI:10.4274/dir.2025.253291
Xiaolong Liu, Keping Liao, Peng Wang, Yongqiang Gao, Yongxin Du
{"title":"磁共振成像对直肠癌患者盆腔外侧淋巴结转移的诊断价值:荟萃分析和系统回顾。","authors":"Xiaolong Liu, Keping Liao, Peng Wang, Yongqiang Gao, Yongxin Du","doi":"10.4274/dir.2025.253291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Accurate identification of lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastasis is imperative for guiding LPLN dissection to reduce local recurrence in patients with rectal carcinoma. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for LPLN metastasis in patients with rectal carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify studies related to the diagnostic performance of MRI for LPLN metastasis in patients with rectal carcinoma through June 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis included 12 studies comprising 1,015 patients. The pooled sensitivity [95% confidence interval (CI)] and specificity (95% CI) of MRI for diagnosing LPLN metastasis were 0.66 (0.53, 0.80) and 0.82 (0.76, 0.88), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio (LR) (95% CI) and negative LR (95% CI) were 2.82 (2.14, 3.51) and 0.41 (0.27, 0.55), respectively. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve indicated an area under the curve of 0.824. The quality of the included studies was acceptable according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. However, publication bias was present, as indicated by Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test (<i>P</i> = 0.020). Considering that heterogeneity contributed to publication bias, a meta-regression analysis was conducted and revealed that heterogeneity could be influenced by sample size, with sample size negatively associated with sensitivity (coefficient: -0.002, <i>P</i> = 0.009) and positively associated with negative LR (coefficient: 0.002, <i>P</i> = 0.029).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative MRI demonstrates an acceptable ability to identify LPLN metastasis in patients with rectal carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Clinically, our findings support that preoperative MRI has acceptable diagnostic ability for LPLN metastasis in patients with rectal carcinoma. The preoperative application of MRI may aid in optimizing treatment strategies and improving prognosis in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":11341,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","volume":" ","pages":"423-429"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417917/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal carcinoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaolong Liu, Keping Liao, Peng Wang, Yongqiang Gao, Yongxin Du\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/dir.2025.253291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Accurate identification of lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastasis is imperative for guiding LPLN dissection to reduce local recurrence in patients with rectal carcinoma. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for LPLN metastasis in patients with rectal carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify studies related to the diagnostic performance of MRI for LPLN metastasis in patients with rectal carcinoma through June 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis included 12 studies comprising 1,015 patients. The pooled sensitivity [95% confidence interval (CI)] and specificity (95% CI) of MRI for diagnosing LPLN metastasis were 0.66 (0.53, 0.80) and 0.82 (0.76, 0.88), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio (LR) (95% CI) and negative LR (95% CI) were 2.82 (2.14, 3.51) and 0.41 (0.27, 0.55), respectively. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve indicated an area under the curve of 0.824. The quality of the included studies was acceptable according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. However, publication bias was present, as indicated by Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test (<i>P</i> = 0.020). Considering that heterogeneity contributed to publication bias, a meta-regression analysis was conducted and revealed that heterogeneity could be influenced by sample size, with sample size negatively associated with sensitivity (coefficient: -0.002, <i>P</i> = 0.009) and positively associated with negative LR (coefficient: 0.002, <i>P</i> = 0.029).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative MRI demonstrates an acceptable ability to identify LPLN metastasis in patients with rectal carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Clinically, our findings support that preoperative MRI has acceptable diagnostic ability for LPLN metastasis in patients with rectal carcinoma. The preoperative application of MRI may aid in optimizing treatment strategies and improving prognosis in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic and interventional radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"423-429\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417917/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic and interventional radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2025.253291\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2025.253291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:准确识别盆腔外侧淋巴结(LPLN)转移,对指导盆腔外侧淋巴结清扫,减少直肠癌患者局部复发具有重要意义。本荟萃分析旨在探讨磁共振成像(MRI)对直肠癌患者LPLN转移的诊断性能。方法:检索Embase、PubMed、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆,以确定截至2024年6月MRI诊断直肠癌患者LPLN转移的相关研究。结果:本荟萃分析包括12项研究,1015例患者。MRI诊断LPLN转移的总敏感性[95%置信区间(CI)]和特异性(95% CI)分别为0.66(0.53,0.80)和0.82(0.76,0.88)。合并阳性似然比(LR) (95% CI)和阴性似然比(95% CI)分别为2.82(2.14,3.51)和0.41(0.27,0.55)。综合受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.824。根据诊断准确性研究质量评估-2工具,纳入研究的质量是可接受的。然而,Deeks漏斗图不对称检验显示,存在发表偏倚(P = 0.020)。考虑到异质性会导致发表偏倚,我们进行了meta回归分析,发现异质性会受到样本量的影响,样本量与敏感性呈负相关(系数:-0.002,P = 0.009),与负LR呈正相关(系数:0.002,P = 0.029)。结论:术前MRI对直肠癌患者的LPLN转移具有可接受的识别能力。临床意义:我们的研究结果支持术前MRI对直肠癌患者LPLN转移的诊断能力。术前应用MRI可能有助于优化治疗策略和改善该人群的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal carcinoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal carcinoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal carcinoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal carcinoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Purpose: Accurate identification of lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastasis is imperative for guiding LPLN dissection to reduce local recurrence in patients with rectal carcinoma. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for LPLN metastasis in patients with rectal carcinoma.

Methods: Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify studies related to the diagnostic performance of MRI for LPLN metastasis in patients with rectal carcinoma through June 2024.

Results: This meta-analysis included 12 studies comprising 1,015 patients. The pooled sensitivity [95% confidence interval (CI)] and specificity (95% CI) of MRI for diagnosing LPLN metastasis were 0.66 (0.53, 0.80) and 0.82 (0.76, 0.88), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio (LR) (95% CI) and negative LR (95% CI) were 2.82 (2.14, 3.51) and 0.41 (0.27, 0.55), respectively. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve indicated an area under the curve of 0.824. The quality of the included studies was acceptable according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. However, publication bias was present, as indicated by Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test (P = 0.020). Considering that heterogeneity contributed to publication bias, a meta-regression analysis was conducted and revealed that heterogeneity could be influenced by sample size, with sample size negatively associated with sensitivity (coefficient: -0.002, P = 0.009) and positively associated with negative LR (coefficient: 0.002, P = 0.029).

Conclusion: Preoperative MRI demonstrates an acceptable ability to identify LPLN metastasis in patients with rectal carcinoma.

Clinical significance: Clinically, our findings support that preoperative MRI has acceptable diagnostic ability for LPLN metastasis in patients with rectal carcinoma. The preoperative application of MRI may aid in optimizing treatment strategies and improving prognosis in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostic and interventional radiology
Diagnostic and interventional radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
4.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Diagn Interv Radiol) is the open access, online-only official publication of Turkish Society of Radiology. It is published bimonthly and the journal’s publication language is English. The journal is a medium for original articles, reviews, pictorial essays, technical notes related to all fields of diagnostic and interventional radiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信